• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我们的项目,你的问题?” 世界卫生组织在南非的信使核糖核酸技术转让计划案例研究

'Our project, your problem?' A case study of the WHO's mRNA technology transfer programme in South Africa.

作者信息

Herder Matthew, Benavides Ximena

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

Health Justice Institute, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Sep 23;4(9):e0003173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003173. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003173
PMID:39312552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11419367/
Abstract

In June 2021 the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP) launched an mRNA technology transfer programme. With a South African consortium serving as the hub, the programme aimed to increase vaccine manufacturing capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in view of the "vaccine apartheid" that was observed during COVID-19. Following Clarke's "situational analysis," the present study assessed whether the mRNA programme differs from the approach and practices that comprise current biopharmaceutical production. Numerous documentary sources, including legal agreements underpinning the programme, funding agreements, and patent filings, were reviewed. Semi-structured interviews with 35 individuals, ranging from the programme's architects and university scientists to representatives from LMIC vaccine manufacturers taking part in the programme were also conducted. While the mRNA programme may improve the sharing of knowledge, other design features, in particular, weak conditionalities around product affordability, participants' freedom to contract with third parties, and acceptance of market-based competition, are in line with the status quo. Further, WHO and MPP's tight control over the programme evokes the dynamics that are often in play in global health, to the detriment of empowering LMIC-based manufacturers to generate mRNA products in response to local health needs.

摘要

2021年6月,世界卫生组织(WHO)和药品专利池(MPP)发起了一项mRNA技术转让计划。该计划以一个南非财团为中心,鉴于在新冠疫情期间观察到的“疫苗种族隔离”现象,旨在提高低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的疫苗生产能力。继克拉克的“情况分析”之后,本研究评估了mRNA计划是否不同于构成当前生物制药生产的方法和实践。研究审查了众多文献资料,包括该计划的相关法律协议、资助协议和专利申请。还对35个人进行了半结构化访谈,这些人涵盖了该计划的设计者、大学科学家以及参与该计划的低收入和中等收入国家疫苗制造商的代表。虽然mRNA计划可能会促进知识共享,但其他设计特点,特别是在产品可负担性方面的条件薄弱、参与者与第三方签约的自由以及对基于市场竞争的接受,与现状相符。此外,世卫组织和药品专利池对该计划的严格控制引发了全球卫生领域经常出现的动态变化,不利于增强低收入和中等收入国家制造商根据当地卫生需求生产mRNA产品的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f0/11419367/ecf21aee9785/pgph.0003173.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f0/11419367/395056b4a554/pgph.0003173.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f0/11419367/ecf21aee9785/pgph.0003173.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f0/11419367/395056b4a554/pgph.0003173.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f0/11419367/ecf21aee9785/pgph.0003173.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
'Our project, your problem?' A case study of the WHO's mRNA technology transfer programme in South Africa.“我们的项目,你的问题?” 世界卫生组织在南非的信使核糖核酸技术转让计划案例研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Sep 23;4(9):e0003173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003173. eCollection 2024.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Preclinical evaluation in hamster model of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine candidate AfriVac 2121 (Wuhan) produced under the WHO/MPP mRNA Technology Transfer Programme.在世界卫生组织/多边抗疫合作机制信使核糖核酸技术转让计划下生产的新冠信使核糖核酸候选疫苗阿弗里瓦克2121(武汉株)在仓鼠模型中的临床前评估。
Vaccine. 2024 Dec 2;42(26):126378. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126378. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
4
An mRNA technology transfer programme and economic sustainability in health care.mRNA 技术转移计划与医疗保健的经济可持续性。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 May 1;102(5):344-351. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.291388. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
5
Key considerations for the development of novel mRNA candidate vaccines in LMICs: A WHO/MPP mRNA Technology Transfer Programme meeting report.在中低收入国家开发新型 mRNA 候选疫苗的关键考虑因素:世界卫生组织/药物专利池 mRNA 技术转让计划会议报告。
Vaccine. 2023 Nov 30;41(49):7307-7312. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.10.027. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
6
The Future of Epidemic and Pandemic Vaccines to Serve Global Public Health Needs.满足全球公共卫生需求的流行性和大流行性疫苗的未来。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Mar 17;11(3):690. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11030690.
7
Pharmacovigilance in India, Uganda and South Africa with reference to WHO's minimum requirements.印度、乌干达和南非的药物警戒工作,参考世卫组织的最低要求。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Mar 9;4(5):295-305. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.55.
8
Tuberculosis结核病
9
Enabling local provision of assistive products in rural South India: an organisational survey of needs, barriers, and facilitators.在印度南部农村地区提供辅助器具服务的能力建设:对需求、障碍和促进因素的组织调查。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Nov;19(8):2904-2914. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2321601. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
10
Community-based rehabilitation programme as a model for task-shifting.社区康复方案:任务转移模式
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(21-22):1997-2005. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.553710. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
How Can We Prevent a Resurgence of Vaccine Nationalism?我们如何防止疫苗民族主义再次抬头?
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:9038. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.9038. Epub 2025 May 18.
2
Technology transfer, intellectual property, and the fight for the soul of WHO.技术转让、知识产权与争夺世卫组织的灵魂之战。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;4(12):e0003940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003940. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing an agenda for the decolonization of global health.制定全球卫生非殖民化议程。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Feb 1;102(2):130-136. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.289949. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
2
A critical analysis of COVAX alliance and corresponding global health governance and policy issues: a scoping review.对 COVAX 联盟及相应的全球卫生治理和政策问题的批判性分析:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012168.
3
Global health security and the health-security nexus: principles, politics and praxis.
全球卫生安全与卫生安全关联:原则、政治与实践。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Sep;8(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013067.
4
Misguided charity: the bane of global health.被误导的慈善:全球健康的祸根。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Sep;8(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013322.
5
Negotiating public-health intellectual property licensing agreements to increase access to health technologies: an insider's story.谈判公共卫生知识产权许可协议以增加卫生技术的获取:内幕故事。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Sep;8(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012964.
6
The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the Partnerships of Equitable Vaccine Access.流行病防范创新联盟(CEPI)和公平疫苗获取伙伴关系。
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(2):234-246. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.85. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
7
Biopharmaceutical Financialization and Public Funding of Medical Countermeasures (MCMs) in Canada During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,加拿大的生物制药金融化与医疗对策(MCM)的公共资金投入
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6936. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6936. Epub 2023 May 27.
8
Public health leaders must confront the power imbalances that harm global health.公共卫生领导者必须应对那些损害全球健康的权力失衡问题。
Nat Med. 2023 Sep;29(9):2158-2159. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02446-w.
9
Global inequities in access to COVID-19 health products and technologies: A political economy analysis.全球在获取 COVID-19 卫生产品和技术方面的不平等:政治经济学分析。
Health Place. 2023 Sep;83:103051. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103051. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
10
Opportunities and challenges of leveraging COVID-19 vaccine innovation and technologies for developing sustainable vaccine manufacturing capabilities in Africa.利用 COVID-19 疫苗创新和技术在非洲发展可持续疫苗制造能力的机遇和挑战。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Aug;23(8):e288-e300. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00878-7. Epub 2023 Jun 5.