Baía Bezerra Fernando, Rodrigues Sobreira Luis Eduardo, Tsuchiya Sano Vitor Kendi, de Oliveira Macena Lôbo Artur, Cavalcanti Orestes Cardoso Jorge Henrique, Alves Kelly Francinny, Aquino de Moraes Francisco Cezar, Consolim-Colombo Fernanda Marciano
Anhembi Morumbi University, Avenida Deputado Benedito Matarazzo, 6070 - Jardim Aquarius, São José Dos Campos, Brazil.
Federal University of Pará, 68371-040, Altamira, Brazil.
Herz. 2025 Apr;50(2):135-141. doi: 10.1007/s00059-024-05275-w. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
Patients who have undergone catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) may experience recurrence of this condition. The efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan (S/V) in preventing AF recurrence compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) is not established. This meta-analysis aimed to establish the best therapeutic choice for preventing AF recurrence after catheter ablation.
A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the use of S/V with ACEI/ARB in patients who underwent catheter ablation. Results are presented as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed with the I statistic, and outcomes are expressed as relative risk (RR). R software version 4.2.3 was used for the analysis.
Three RCTs and one cohort study, comprising 642 patients with 319 patients in the S/V group and 323 in the control group, were included. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months, with mean ages ranging from 58.9 to 65.8 years. A significant reduction in persistent AF occurrence was demonstrated favoring the S/V group (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: [0.41, 0.70]; p = 0.000004; I: 80%) over the ACEI/ARB group. There was no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction with S/V use (MD: 1.23; 95% CI: [-0.12, 2.60]; p = 0.076; I: 0%) compared with ACEI/ARB. The analysis also showed a significant reduction in left atrial volume index (MD: -5.33; 95% CI: [-8.76, -1.90]; p = 0.002; I: 57%) in the S/V group compared with the ACEI/ARB group.
This meta-analysis demonstrated the efficacy of S/V in reducing the incidence of AF in patients undergoing catheter ablation compared with the use of ACEI/ARB. However, more RCTs are needed for a comprehensive evaluation of its efficacy in reducing AF recurrence after catheter ablation in clinical practice.
接受房颤导管消融术的患者可能会出现房颤复发。与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦(S/V)预防房颤复发的疗效尚未确定。本荟萃分析旨在确定导管消融术后预防房颤复发的最佳治疗选择。
对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行系统检索,以查找比较接受导管消融术的患者使用S/V与ACEI/ARB的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究。结果以平均差(MD)和95%置信区间(CI)表示。使用I统计量评估异质性,结果以相对风险(RR)表示。使用R软件4.2.3版进行分析。
纳入了3项RCT和1项队列研究,共642例患者,其中S/V组319例,对照组323例。随访时间为6至36个月,平均年龄为58.9至65.8岁。结果显示,与ACEI/ARB组相比,S/V组持续性房颤的发生率显著降低(RR:0.54;95%CI:[0.41, 0.70];p = 0.000004;I:80%)。与使用ACEI/ARB相比,使用S/V时左心室射血分数无显著差异(MD:1.23;95%CI:[-0.12, 2.60];p = 0.076;I:0%)。分析还显示,与ACEI/ARB组相比,S/V组的左心房容积指数显著降低(MD:-5.33;95%CI:[-8.76, -1.90];p = 0.002;I:57%)。
本荟萃分析表明,与使用ACEI/ARB相比,S/V在降低接受导管消融术患者的房颤发生率方面具有疗效。然而,在临床实践中,需要更多的RCT来全面评估其在降低导管消融术后房颤复发方面的疗效。