• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《爱的能力量表》在斯洛文尼亚的效度验证:与临床测量及正念的关联

Slovenian validation of the Capacity to Love Inventory: associations with clinical measures and mindfulness.

作者信息

Glavač Timotej, Poštuvan Vita, Schmeckenbecher Jim, Kapusta Nestor D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Andrej Marušič Institute, Slovene Centre for Suicide Research, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 9;15:1440013. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1440013. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1440013
PMID:39315040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11417625/
Abstract

AIM

The main purpose of the present study was to validate the Slovenian version of the 41- item Capacity to Love Inventory (CTL-I). Based on psychoanalytic theory, limitations to capacity to love are expected to be associated with personality dysfunction and disintegration as well as fundamental mental capacities such as self-reflection and self-awareness.

METHOD

To examine these assumptions, a sample of 552 Slovenian non-clinical individuals were recruited through academic networks. The construct validity of the CTL-I was assessed using a confirmatory factor analysis and convergent validity of the CTL-I and its subscales was established against IPO-16, PID-5 BF, MAAS.

RESULTS

Our findings show that the Slovenian version of the CTL-I replicated the six-factor structure, exhibiting good model fit as well as satisfactory internal consistency of all subscales. In line with expectations, capacity to love was found to be inversely associated with dysfunctional personality traits and structural personality disturbances. Accordingly, higher dispositional mindfulness was coherently associated with all domains of CTL-I.

CONCLUSION

The results add to the growing evidence for the cross-cultural validity and sound psychometric properties of CTL-I, presented here in the Slovenian version. Our findings also point to the significance of dispositional mindfulness both in relation to capacity to love as well as mental health.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是验证斯洛文尼亚语版的41项爱的能力量表(CTL-I)。基于精神分析理论,预计爱的能力限制与人格功能障碍和瓦解以及诸如自我反思和自我意识等基本心理能力相关。

方法

为检验这些假设,通过学术网络招募了552名斯洛文尼亚非临床个体作为样本。使用验证性因素分析评估CTL-I的结构效度,并对照IPO-16、PID-5 BF、MAAS确立CTL-I及其子量表的收敛效度。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,斯洛文尼亚语版的CTL-I重现了六因素结构,显示出良好的模型拟合以及所有子量表令人满意的内部一致性。正如预期的那样,发现爱的能力与功能失调的人格特质和结构性人格障碍呈负相关。因此,较高的特质正念与CTL-I的所有领域都密切相关。

结论

研究结果进一步证明了CTL-I(此处为斯洛文尼亚语版)的跨文化效度和良好的心理测量特性。我们的研究结果还指出了特质正念在爱的能力和心理健康方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
Slovenian validation of the Capacity to Love Inventory: associations with clinical measures and mindfulness.《爱的能力量表》在斯洛文尼亚的效度验证:与临床测量及正念的关联
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 9;15:1440013. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1440013. eCollection 2024.
2
Italian Validation of the Capacity to Love Inventory: Preliminary Results.《爱的能力量表》的意大利语验证:初步结果。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 15;9:1434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01434. eCollection 2018.
3
Measuring the Capacity to Love: Development of the CTL-Inventory.测量爱的能力:CTL 量表的编制
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 24;9:1115. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01115. eCollection 2018.
4
Reliability and factorial validity of long and brief versions of the inventory of personality organization in a Latvian sample.拉脱维亚样本中人格组织量表长版与简版的信度和因素效度
Res Psychother. 2022 Jun 30;25(2):606. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2022.606.
5
Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model.中文学生和患者的 DSM-5 简短形式人格量表(PID-5-BF):评估五因素模型和具有文化意义的六因素模型。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03080-x.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Short Version of the Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO-18) in a Nonclinical Sample.人格组织量表(IPO-18)西班牙语短版在非临床样本中的心理测量特性。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Sep-Oct;103(5):659-666. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1878524. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
Being Female and in a Romantic Relationship Enhances the Association between Satisfaction with Love Life and Capacity to Love.女性身份和恋爱关系增强了对爱情生活的满意度与爱的能力之间的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 24;20(23):7108. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20237108.
8
[Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].[克鲁格五因素人格问卷简版(PID-5 BF)法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Translation and cultural adaptation of the DSM-5 Personality Inventory - Brief Form (PID-5-BF).DSM-5 人格障碍简明量表(PID-5-BF)的翻译与文化调适。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2020 Oct-Dec;42(4):291-301. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0073.
10
Psychometric properties of the five-item version of the Mindful Awareness Attention Scale (MAAS) in Norwegian adolescents.挪威青少年中五项版正念觉知注意量表(MAAS)的心理测量特性。
Scand J Public Health. 2017 Jun;45(4):373-380. doi: 10.1177/1403494817699321. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Being Female and in a Romantic Relationship Enhances the Association between Satisfaction with Love Life and Capacity to Love.女性身份和恋爱关系增强了对爱情生活的满意度与爱的能力之间的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 24;20(23):7108. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20237108.

本文引用的文献

1
The relationship between adult attachment and mental health: A meta-analysis.成人依恋与心理健康之间的关系:一项元分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Nov;123(5):1089-1137. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000437.
2
Mindfulness-based programmes for mental health promotion in adults in nonclinical settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.基于正念的成人非临床环境下心理健康促进计划:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Jan 11;18(1):e1003481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003481. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
The Impact of Personality Disorders on Longitudinal Change in Relationship Satisfaction in Long-Term Married Couples.
人格障碍对长期已婚夫妇关系满意度纵向变化的影响。
J Pers Disord. 2020 Aug;34(4):439-458. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_392. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
4
Italian Validation of the Capacity to Love Inventory: Preliminary Results.《爱的能力量表》的意大利语验证:初步结果。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 15;9:1434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01434. eCollection 2018.
5
Measuring the Capacity to Love: Development of the CTL-Inventory.测量爱的能力:CTL 量表的编制
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 24;9:1115. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01115. eCollection 2018.
6
Dispositional Mindfulness and Psychological Health: a Systematic Review.内隐正念与心理健康:一项系统综述。
Mindfulness (N Y). 2018;9(1):23-43. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0762-6. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
7
Adult attachment, stress, and romantic relationships.成人依恋、压力与浪漫关系。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Feb;13:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
8
Construct Validity of the DSM-5 Section III Maladaptive Trait Domains in Older Adults.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版第三部分中老年人适应不良特质领域的结构效度
J Pers Disord. 2017 Oct;31(5):671-688. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_274. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
9
Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the Measurement of Maladaptive Personality and Psychopathology.DSM-5 简明人格量表(PID-5-BF)在测量适应不良人格和精神病理学中的效用。
Assessment. 2018 Jul;25(5):596-607. doi: 10.1177/1073191116676889. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
10
Personality pathology and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples.恋爱和已婚伴侣中的人格病理学与关系满意度。
Personal Disord. 2018 Jan;9(1):81-92. doi: 10.1037/per0000219. Epub 2016 Oct 24.