McMahon J E, Marshall T F, Vaughan J P, Abaru D E
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1979 Oct;73(5):457-64. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1979.11687285.
Three techniques were compared for counting microfilariae of Wuchereria bancrofti in blood specimens--a standard slide method, the counting chamber technique (CCT) and a membrane filtration technique (MFCT). The CCT was much more sensitive than the slide method, the difference in sensitivity between these two methods probably being due mainly to the loss of microfilariae during the dehaemoglobinizing process prior to staining in the standard slide method. There was good correlation between the techniques when 0.1 ml of finger-prick blood was examined by the CCT and 1 ml of venous blood by the MFCT. The number of additional positives revealed by the MFCT was ten of 275 (3.6%) subjects examined. The use of venepuncture for MFCT is impractical for field surveys in East Africa whereas a microfilarial count on 0.1 ml of finger-prick blood meets most of the criteria required of a field technique. The method is simple, quantitative and acceptable to the population. The results are reproducible, can be readily checked, the technique provides a useful and practical method for obtaining prevalence information following control schemes. The finding of a relatively low prevalence of microfilariae seen by both MFCT and CCT in children aged five to nine years from a highly endemic filariasis area agrees with the results of previous East African surveys carried out by blood smear and CCT.
对血液样本中班氏吴策线虫微丝蚴计数的三种技术进行了比较——标准玻片法、计数室技术(CCT)和膜过滤技术(MFCT)。CCT比玻片法灵敏得多,这两种方法在灵敏度上的差异可能主要是由于标准玻片法在染色前的血红蛋白去除过程中微丝蚴有所损失。当用CCT检测0.1毫升指尖血且用MFCT检测1毫升静脉血时,这两种技术之间具有良好的相关性。在接受检测的275名受试者中,MFCT检测出额外阳性的有10人(3.6%)。在东非进行现场调查时,对MFCT采用静脉穿刺并不实际,而对0.1毫升指尖血进行微丝蚴计数符合现场技术所需的大多数标准。该方法简单、可定量且人群可接受。结果具有可重复性,易于检查,该技术为在控制计划后获取流行率信息提供了一种有用且实用的方法。在丝虫病高度流行地区,5至9岁儿童中通过MFCT和CCT检测到的微丝蚴流行率相对较低,这一发现与先前东非通过血涂片和CCT进行的调查结果一致。