• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能预测急诊科就诊的计费代码级别

Artificial Intelligence to Predict Billing Code Levels of Emergency Department Encounters.

作者信息

Morey Jacob, Winters Richard, Jones Derick

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2025 Jan;85(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.07.011. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.07.011
PMID:39320279
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To use artificial intelligence (AI) to predict billing code levels for emergency department (ED) encounters.

METHODS

We accessed ED encounters from our health system from January to September 2023. We developed an ensemble model using natural language processing and machine learning techniques to predict billing codes from clinical notes combined with clinical characteristics and orders. Explainable AI techniques were used to help determine the important model features. The main endpoint was to predict evaluation and management professional billing codes (levels 2 to 5 [Current Procedural Terminology codes 99282 to 99285] and critical care). Secondary endpoints included predicting professional billing codes at different decision boundary thresholds and generalizability of the model at other EDs.

RESULTS

There were 321,893 adult ED encounters coded at levels 2 (<1%), 3 (5%), 4 (38%), 5 (51%), and critical care (5%). Model performance for professional billing code levels of 4 and 5 yielded area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.94 and 0.95, accuracy values of 0.80 and 0.92, and F1-scores of 0.79 and 0.91, respectively. At a 95% decision boundary threshold, level 5 predicted charts had a precision/positive predictive value of 0.99 and recall/sensitivity of 0.57. The most important features using Shapley Additive Explanations values were critical care note, number of orders, discharge disposition, cardiology, and psychiatry.

CONCLUSION

Currently available AI models accurately predict billing code levels for ED encounters based on clinical notes, clinical characteristics, and orders. This has the potential to automate coding of ED encounters and save administrative costs and time.

摘要

研究目的

利用人工智能(AI)预测急诊科(ED)就诊的计费代码级别。

方法

我们获取了2023年1月至9月我们医疗系统中的急诊科就诊记录。我们开发了一个集成模型,使用自然语言处理和机器学习技术,根据临床记录以及临床特征和医嘱来预测计费代码。使用可解释人工智能技术来帮助确定重要的模型特征。主要终点是预测评估和管理专业计费代码(2至5级[现行程序术语代码99282至99285]以及重症监护)。次要终点包括在不同决策边界阈值下预测专业计费代码以及该模型在其他急诊科的通用性。

结果

有321,893例成人急诊科就诊记录被编码为2级(<1%)、3级(5%)、4级(38%)、5级(51%)和重症监护(5%)。4级和5级专业计费代码级别的模型性能分别产生接收者操作特征曲线下面积值为0.94和0.95,准确率值为0.80和0.92,F1分数为0.79和0.91。在95%的决策边界阈值下,5级预测图表的精确率/阳性预测值为0.99,召回率/敏感度为0.57。使用沙普利值最重要的特征是重症监护记录、医嘱数量、出院处置、心脏病学和精神病学。

结论

目前可用的人工智能模型能够根据临床记录、临床特征和医嘱准确预测急诊科就诊的计费代码级别。这有可能实现急诊科就诊编码的自动化,并节省管理成本和时间。

相似文献

1
Artificial Intelligence to Predict Billing Code Levels of Emergency Department Encounters.人工智能预测急诊科就诊的计费代码级别
Ann Emerg Med. 2025 Jan;85(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.07.011. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
2
Emergency severity index triage system correlation with emergency department evaluation and management billing codes and total professional charges.紧急严重指数分诊系统与急诊科评估和管理计费代码和总专业费用的相关性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;18(11):1161-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01203.x.
3
Can Natural Language Processing and Artificial Intelligence Automate The Generation of Billing Codes From Operative Note Dictations?自然语言处理和人工智能能否根据手术记录口述自动生成计费代码?
Global Spine J. 2023 Sep;13(7):1946-1955. doi: 10.1177/21925682211062831. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
4
How artificial intelligence could transform emergency care.人工智能如何改变急救护理。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul;81:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.04.024. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
5
An Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Trauma Mortality Among Emergency Department Patients in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study.一种用于预测韩国急诊科创伤患者死亡率的人工智能模型:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 29;25:e49283. doi: 10.2196/49283.
6
Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis.
Am J Med Qual. 2025;40(2):38-43. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000223. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
7
Natural language processing of admission notes to predict severe maternal morbidity during the delivery encounter.入院记录的自然语言处理预测分娩时严重产妇发病率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;227(3):511.e1-511.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.008. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
8
Chatbot Demonstrates Moderate Interrater Reliability in Billing for Hand Surgery Clinic Encounters.聊天机器人在手外科门诊计费方面显示出中等程度的评分者间信度。
Hand (N Y). 2024 Nov 16:15589447241295328. doi: 10.1177/15589447241295328.
9
Using machine learning and natural language processing in triage for prediction of clinical disposition in the emergency department.在急诊科分诊中使用机器学习和自然语言处理来预测临床处置情况。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01152-1.
10
Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.急诊患者诊疗记录与编码:电子病历准确性评估
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;24(6):664-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.02.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and Future Perspectives for Artificial Intelligence in Hepatology: Breaking Barriers for Better Care.肝病学中人工智能的挑战与未来展望:突破障碍,实现更好的治疗。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):102579. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102579. Epub 2025 Apr 14.