• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚拟咨询服务的伦理评估:应用实用伦理检查表对新西兰的直接面向消费者服务进行评估。

Ethical assessment of virtual consultation services: application of a practical ethical checklist to direct-to-consumer services in Aotearoa New Zealand.

机构信息

Otago Medical School, University of Otago, New Zealand.

Bioethics Centre, University of Otago, 71 Frederick Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Prim Health Care. 2024 Sep;16(3):295-300. doi: 10.1071/HC24030.

DOI:10.1071/HC24030
PMID:39321084
Abstract

Introduction Evaluating digital health services from an ethical perspective remains one of the more difficult challenges in telemedicine and health technology assessment. We have previously developed a practical ethical checklist comprising 25 questions covering six ethical themes: privacy, security, and confidentiality; equity; autonomy and informed consent; quality and standards of care; patient empowerment; and continuity of care. The checklist makes ethical analysis more easily accessible to a broader audience, including health care providers, technology developers, and patients. Aim This project applies the previously developed practical ethical checklist to direct-to-consumer virtual primary care consultation services in Aotearoa New Zealand to conduct an ethical assessment. Method We first mapped the available services. The ethical framework was then applied to assess these services based on publicly available information. Results Our findings show that the examined virtual consultation services adequately address ethical considerations, particularly regarding patient data privacy and informed consent. We identified areas for improvement in equity, patient empowerment, and continuity of care. Discussion The application of this framework raises fundamental questions on how continuity of care, equity, and comprehensive care can be protected when virtual care becomes more ubiquitous. The checklist can help virtual consultation services identify areas of improvement and ensure they meet ethical criteria, thus contributing to quality of care. The framework may be adapted to other digital health services and tools, providing ethical guidance to technology developers, clinicians, and patients and their whānau (family).

摘要

引言

从伦理角度评估数字健康服务仍然是远程医疗和卫生技术评估中较为困难的挑战之一。我们之前开发了一个实用的伦理检查表,其中包含 25 个问题,涵盖了六个伦理主题:隐私、安全和保密性;公平;自主权和知情同意;护理质量和标准;患者赋权;以及护理的连续性。该检查表使更广泛的受众(包括医疗保健提供者、技术开发人员和患者)更容易进行伦理分析。

目的

本项目将之前开发的实用伦理检查表应用于新西兰的直接面向消费者的虚拟初级保健咨询服务,以进行伦理评估。

方法

我们首先对可用服务进行了映射。然后,根据公开信息应用伦理框架来评估这些服务。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,所检查的虚拟咨询服务充分考虑了伦理问题,特别是患者数据隐私和知情同意。我们确定了在公平、患者赋权和护理连续性方面需要改进的领域。

讨论

该框架的应用提出了一些基本问题,即在虚拟护理变得更加普及的情况下,如何保护护理的连续性、公平性和全面性。检查表可以帮助虚拟咨询服务确定需要改进的领域,并确保它们符合伦理标准,从而有助于提高护理质量。该框架可以适应其他数字健康服务和工具,为技术开发人员、临床医生以及患者及其家属提供伦理指导。

相似文献

1
Ethical assessment of virtual consultation services: application of a practical ethical checklist to direct-to-consumer services in Aotearoa New Zealand.虚拟咨询服务的伦理评估:应用实用伦理检查表对新西兰的直接面向消费者服务进行评估。
J Prim Health Care. 2024 Sep;16(3):295-300. doi: 10.1071/HC24030.
2
Ethical assessment of virtual consultation services: scoping review and development of a practical ethical checklist.虚拟咨询服务的伦理评估:范围综述和实用伦理检查表的制定。
J Prim Health Care. 2024 Sep;16(3):288-294. doi: 10.1071/HC24027.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
Ethical considerations for artificial intelligence in dermatology: a scoping review.人工智能在皮肤科应用的伦理考量:范围综述。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 May 17;190(6):789-797. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae040.
6
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
7
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
8
Telehealth Use and Legal Considerations in Drug Health Services During Pandemics: Systematic Scoping Review.远程医疗在大流行期间药物健康服务中的使用及法律问题考量:系统范围界定综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 12;26:e46394. doi: 10.2196/46394.
9
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
10
A balancing act: exploring ethical and legal concerns associated with release of personal information in alert systems for missing persons with dementia.一场平衡行动:探讨与痴呆症失踪人员警报系统中个人信息发布相关的伦理和法律问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 May 5;26(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01214-4.