• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A retrospective claims data analysis of health care utilization and cost among patients receiving multi-injection intraarticular hyaluronic acid.多部位关节内注射透明质酸治疗患者的医疗利用和成本的回顾性索赔数据分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Oct;30(10):1117-1127. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1117.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Early to Moderate Stage Knee Osteoarthritis with Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid Compared to Conservative Interventions.与保守治疗相比,用关节内透明质酸治疗早期至中期膝关节骨关节炎的成本效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jan;37(1):344-352. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01142-x. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
3
Association between intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections in delaying total knee arthroplasty and safety evaluation in primary knee osteoarthritis: analysis based on Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) claim database in Republic of Korea.在韩国健康保险审查与评估服务数据库(HIRA)中,基于原发性膝关节骨关节炎,对关节内透明质酸注射与全膝关节置换术延迟的相关性及其安全性进行评估分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 4;25(1):706. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07698-2.
4
Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Treatment of Advanced Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Utilization and Cost in a National Population Sample.透明质酸注射治疗晚期膝关节骨关节炎:全国人口样本中的使用情况和成本
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):1429-35. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01358.
5
Knee OA cost comparison for hyaluronic acid and knee arthroplasty.膝关节骨关节炎透明质酸与膝关节置换术成本比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 6;15(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01848-7.
6
Cost-Utility Analysis of High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis in Everyday Clinical Care in Patients at a Working Age: An Economic Evaluation of a Randomized Clinical Trial.在工作年龄段患者的日常临床护理中,用于膝关节骨关节炎的高分子量透明质酸的成本-效用分析:一项随机临床试验的经济学评价。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Jan;70(1):89-97. doi: 10.1002/acr.23242.
7
Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Among Newly Diagnosed and Oral Anticoagulant-Naive Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated with Dabigatran or Warfarin in the United States.美国新诊断且未使用口服抗凝剂的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者接受达比加群或华法林治疗的医疗资源利用和成本
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jan;24(1):73-82. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.1.73.
8
Prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy of single 6-ml injection of hylan G-F 20 and hyaluronic acid for primary knee arthritis: a preliminary study.比较单次6毫升注射透明质烷G-F 20和透明质酸治疗原发性膝关节炎疗效的前瞻性随机试验:一项初步研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Oct;95 Suppl 10:S92-7.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of intra-articular injections of a high molecular weight bioengineered hyaluronic acid for the treatment of osteoarthritis knee pain.关节腔内注射高分子量生物工程透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎疼痛的成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2014 May;17(5):326-37. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.902843. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
10
Is Intra-Articular Injection of Synvisc Associated with a Delay to Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis?关节内注射施沛特是否会延迟膝骨关节炎患者的膝关节置换术?
Cartilage. 2019 Oct;10(4):423-431. doi: 10.1177/1947603518775792. Epub 2018 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Different molecular weights of hyaluronan research in knee osteoarthritis: A state-of-the-art review.不同分子量透明质酸在膝关节骨关节炎中的研究:最新综述
Matrix Biol. 2023 Mar;117:46-71. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
2
Impact of osteoarthritis disease severity on treatment patterns and healthcare resource use: analysis of real-world data.骨关节炎疾病严重程度对治疗模式和医疗资源利用的影响:真实世界数据的分析。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2023 Jul;52(4):353-363. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2022.2058168. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies.基于人群研究的全球、地区膝关节骨关节炎的患病率、发病率及危险因素
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 26;29-30:100587. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100587. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
A Systematic Review of Current Clinical Practice Guidelines on Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid, Corticosteroid, and Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis: An International Perspective.膝关节骨关节炎关节腔内注射透明质酸、皮质类固醇和富血小板血浆的当前临床实践指南的系统评价:国际视角
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Aug 31;9(8):23259671211030272. doi: 10.1177/23259671211030272. eCollection 2021 Aug.
5
Hyperlipidemia and Statin Use on the Progression of Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.高脂血症与他汀类药物的使用对骨关节炎进展的影响:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2021 Jun 28;13(6):e15999. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15999. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Real-World Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Among US Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Compared with Controls.与对照组相比,美国膝骨关节炎患者的真实世界医疗保健资源利用情况及成本
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 May 21;13:421-435. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S302289. eCollection 2021.
7
Comprehensive Review of Knee Osteoarthritis Pharmacological Treatment and the Latest Professional Societies' Guidelines.膝关节骨关节炎药物治疗及专业学会最新指南的综合综述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Mar 2;14(3):205. doi: 10.3390/ph14030205.
8
Multimodal Treatment Patterns for Osteoarthritis and Their Relationship to Patient-Reported Pain Severity: A Cross-Sectional Survey in the United States.骨关节炎的多模式治疗模式及其与患者报告的疼痛严重程度的关系:美国的一项横断面调查
J Pain Res. 2020 Dec 23;13:3415-3425. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S285124. eCollection 2020.
9
Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment Costs in the Medicare Patient Population.医疗保险参保人群中膝关节骨关节炎的治疗费用
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2020 Sep;13(4):144-153.
10
Pain severity and healthcare resource utilization in patients with osteoarthritis in the United States.美国骨关节炎患者的疼痛严重程度和医疗资源利用情况。
Postgrad Med. 2021 Jan;133(1):10-19. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1841988. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

多部位关节内注射透明质酸治疗患者的医疗利用和成本的回顾性索赔数据分析。

A retrospective claims data analysis of health care utilization and cost among patients receiving multi-injection intraarticular hyaluronic acid.

机构信息

Virginia Mason Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Seattle, WA.

Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc, Parsippany, NJ.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Oct;30(10):1117-1127. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1117.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1117
PMID:39321119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11424917/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the rising costs for knee arthroplasty, therapies that allow patients to avoid or delay surgery following knee osteoarthritis (KOA) may help in reducing overall health care costs. Multiple intraarticular hyaluronic acid (HA) products are available on the market, varying by formulation, molecular weight, and number of injections, but clinical and economic benefits may differ by product. To evaluate the all-cause and KOA-related health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among newly diagnosed patients with KOA treated with multi-injection HA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using a large commercial claims database (Merative MarketScan database) to identify patients with KOA treated with high molecular weight (HMW) (n = 11,200), medium molecular weight (MMW) (n = 10,225), or low molecular weight (LMW) HAs (n = 8,473) between 2016 and 2019. KOA-related and all-cause HCRU and costs were compared within 12 months after the index HA treatment date. The association between outcomes and HA treatments was evaluated using a doubly robust method to adjust for confounding factors. HCRU and costs among the propensity score-weighted HA groups were compared using generalized linear models.

RESULTS

HMW HA patients were found to have lower adjusted KOA-related medical costs by $265.37 ( < 0.001) and pharmacy costs by $19.90 ( < 0.001) compared with LMW HA patients, as well as lower all-cause total medical costs by $130.42 ( = 0.013) and pharmacy costs by $63.33 ( < 0.001). HMW HA patients also had a lower adjusted KOA-related medical cost by $205.74 ( < 0.001) and pharmacy cost by $14.39 ( < 0.001) compared with MMW HA patients, as well as lower all-cause medical by $1,195.66 ( < 0.001) and pharmacy by $196.99 ( < 0.001). Three-injection treatment patients (HMW HA, 84%; MMW HA, 82%) had high completion rate, compared with the 5-injection treatment cohort (LMW HA, 48%).

CONCLUSIONS

HMW HA patients had statistically significantly lower adjusted all-cause and KOA-related medical and pharmacy costs at 1 year follow-up compared with MMW HA and LMW HA patients. It is unclear if this is related to differences in molecular weight or specific mechanism of actions.

摘要

背景

随着膝关节置换术成本的上升,能够让膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者避免或推迟手术的疗法可能有助于降低整体医疗保健成本。市场上有多种关节内透明质酸(HA)产品,其配方、分子量和注射次数各不相同,但产品的临床和经济效益可能不同。本研究旨在评估接受多剂量 HA 治疗的新诊断 KOA 患者的全因和 KOA 相关医疗资源利用(HCRU)和成本。

方法

本研究使用大型商业索赔数据库(Merative MarketScan 数据库)进行回顾性队列研究,以确定 2016 年至 2019 年期间接受高分子量(HMW)(n=11200)、中分子量(MMW)(n=10225)或低分子量(LMW)HA 治疗的 KOA 患者(n=8473)。在接受 HA 治疗后 12 个月内比较 KOA 相关和全因 HCRU 和成本。使用双重稳健方法评估结局与 HA 治疗之间的关联,以调整混杂因素。使用广义线性模型比较倾向评分加权 HA 组之间的 HCRU 和成本。

结果

与 LMW HA 患者相比,HMW HA 患者的调整后 KOA 相关医疗费用降低了 265.37 美元(<0.001),药房费用降低了 19.90 美元(<0.001),全因总医疗费用降低了 130.42 美元(=0.013),药房费用降低了 63.33 美元(<0.001)。与 MMW HA 患者相比,HMW HA 患者的调整后 KOA 相关医疗费用降低了 205.74 美元(<0.001),药房费用降低了 14.39 美元(<0.001),全因医疗费用降低了 1195.66 美元(<0.001),药房费用降低了 196.99 美元(<0.001)。与 5 次注射治疗队列(LMW HA,48%)相比,接受 3 次注射治疗的患者(HMW HA,84%;MMW HA,82%)的完成率较高。

结论

与 MMW HA 和 LMW HA 患者相比,HMW HA 患者在 1 年随访时的全因和 KOA 相关医疗和药房费用调整后显著降低。这是否与分子量差异或特定作用机制有关尚不清楚。