Suppr超能文献

关节内注射施沛特是否会延迟膝骨关节炎患者的膝关节置换术?

Is Intra-Articular Injection of Synvisc Associated with a Delay to Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis?

机构信息

Exponent, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Exponent, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA.

出版信息

Cartilage. 2019 Oct;10(4):423-431. doi: 10.1177/1947603518775792. Epub 2018 May 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is debate about the effectiveness of intra-articular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA) injections. We asked the following questions: (1) What is the epidemiology of IA HA use in knee arthroplasty (KA) patients? (2) Is Synvisc associated with a delay to KA? (3) Is there a difference in the delay to KA with the number of HA courses?

DESIGN

The Optum Clinformatics data set (2006-June 2016) was used to identify patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients who did not receive IA HA were identified, along with those who received Synvisc or non-Synvisc HA. The median duration from knee OA to KA was compared using quantile regression modeling with propensity score weighting. The trend in time to KA with each HA course was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 4,027,848 knee OA patients, 141,305 patients underwent KA. Overall median time from knee OA diagnosis to KA was 1.2 years (average: 1.9 ± 1.9 years; interquartile range of 0.4-2.8 years). HA patients had significantly longer adjusted median time to KA by at least 7 months ( < 0.001). After adjusting for the time to HA and number of injections, Synvisc patients had 1.7 months longer time to KA than non-Synvisc HA patients ( < 0.001). There was a trend toward longer time to KA with more HA courses.

CONCLUSIONS

Most KA patients did not use HA (73.7%) and when received, it was associated with a longer median time to KA by at least 7 months, though the cause and effect could not be examined. The delay to KA increased with more HA courses.

摘要

目的

关节内(IA)透明质酸(HA)注射的有效性存在争议。我们提出了以下问题:(1)膝关节置换术(KA)患者中 IA HA 使用的流行病学情况如何?(2)Synvisc 是否会延迟 KA?(3)HA 疗程数量是否会影响 KA 的延迟时间?

设计

使用 Optum Clinformatics 数据集(2006 年-2016 年 6 月)确定膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者。确定未接受 IA HA 治疗的患者,以及接受 Synvisc 或非 Synvisc HA 治疗的患者。使用倾向评分加权的分位数回归模型比较从膝关节 OA 到 KA 的中位持续时间。评估每个 HA 疗程与 KA 时间趋势的关系。

结果

在 4027848 例膝关节 OA 患者中,有 141305 例接受了 KA。膝关节 OA 诊断后至 KA 的总体中位时间为 1.2 年(平均:1.9 ± 1.9 年;四分位距 0.4-2.8 年)。HA 患者调整后的 KA 中位时间至少延长了 7 个月(<0.001)。在调整 HA 时间和注射次数后,Synvisc 患者的 KA 时间比非 Synvisc HA 患者长 1.7 个月(<0.001)。HA 疗程越多,KA 时间延长的趋势越明显。

结论

大多数 KA 患者未使用 HA(73.7%),而接受 HA 治疗的患者 KA 中位时间至少延长了 7 个月,但无法检查因果关系。随着 HA 疗程的增加,KA 的延迟时间也会增加。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Statistics in Brief: An Introduction to the Use of Propensity Scores.简要统计学:倾向得分应用简介
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2722-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4239-4. Epub 2015 Mar 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验