Shaw James, Abejirinde Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade, Agarwal Payal, Shahid Simone, Martin Danielle
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Sep 25;3(9):e0000573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000573. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Research on digital health equity has developed in important ways especially since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a series of clear recommendations now established for policy and practice. However, research and policy addressing the health system dimensions of digital health equity is needed to examine the appropriate roles of digital technologies in enabling access to care. We use a highly cited framework by Levesque et al on patient-centered access to care and the World Health Organization's framework on digitally enabled health systems to generate insights into the ways that digital solutions can support access to needed health care for structurally marginalized communities. Specifically, we mapped the frameworks to identify where applications of digital health do and do not support access to care, documenting which dimensions of access are under-addressed by digital health. Our analysis suggests that digital health has disproportionately focused on downstream enablers of access to care, which are low-yield when equity is the goal. We identify important opportunities for policy makers, funders and other stakeholders to attend more to digital solutions that support upstream enablement of peoples' abilities to understand, perceive, and seek out care. These areas are an important focal point for digital interventions and have the potential to be more equity-enhancing than downstream interventions at the time that care is accessed. Overall, we highlight the importance of taking a health system perspective when considering the roles of digital technologies in enhancing or inhibiting equitable access to needed health care.
尤其是自新冠疫情爆发以来,数字健康公平性研究取得了重要进展,现已为政策制定和实践确立了一系列明确建议。然而,需要开展针对数字健康公平性卫生系统层面的研究和政策,以审视数字技术在促进医疗服务可及性方面的适当作用。我们采用了勒维克等人提出的关于以患者为中心的医疗服务可及性的高引用框架以及世界卫生组织关于数字赋能卫生系统的框架,以深入了解数字解决方案如何支持结构上处于边缘地位的社区获得所需医疗服务。具体而言,我们梳理这些框架,以确定数字健康的应用在哪些方面有助于或无助于医疗服务可及性,并记录数字健康在哪些可及性维度上关注不足。我们的分析表明,数字健康过度关注医疗服务可及性的下游促成因素,而当以公平为目标时,这些因素成效甚微。我们确定了政策制定者、资助者和其他利益相关者的重要机会,即更多地关注支持人们理解、感知和寻求医疗服务能力的上游赋能的数字解决方案。这些领域是数字干预的重要重点,并且在获得医疗服务时,有可能比下游干预措施更能促进公平。总体而言,我们强调在考虑数字技术在增强或抑制所需医疗服务公平可及性方面的作用时,从卫生系统角度出发的重要性。