Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):990-999. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac022.
We sought to understand and synthesize review-level evidence on the challenges associated with accessibility of virtual care among underserved population groups and to identify strategies that can improve access to, uptake of, and engagement with virtual care for these populations.
A scoping review of reviews was conducted (protocol available at doi: 10.2196/22847). A total of 14 028 records were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Epistemonikos databases. Data were abstracted, and challenges and strategies were identified and summarized for each underserved population group and across population groups.
A total of 37 reviews were included. Commonly occurring challenges and strategies were grouped into 6 key thematic areas based on similarities across communities: (1) the person's orientation toward health-related needs, (2) the person's orientation toward health-related technology, (3) the person's digital literacy, (4) technology design, (5) health system structure and organization, and (6) social and structural determinants of access to technology-enabled care. We suggest 4 important directions for policy development: (1) investment in digital health literacy education and training, (2) inclusive digital health technology design, (3) incentivizing inclusive digital health care, and (4) investment in affordable and accessible infrastructure.
Challenges associated with accessibility of virtual care among underserved population groups can occur at the individual, technological, health system, and social/structural determinant levels. Although the policy approaches suggested by our review are likely to be difficult to achieve in a given policy context, they are essential to a more equitable future for virtual care.
我们旨在理解和综合审查级证据,了解服务不足人群群体在获得虚拟医疗方面所面临的挑战,并确定可以改善这些人群获得、接受和参与虚拟医疗的策略。
我们进行了一次综述性文献回顾(可在 doi:10.2196/22847 处查看方案)。从 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Epistemonikos 数据库中检索到了 14028 条记录。提取了数据,并针对每个服务不足的人群群体和跨人群群体,确定和总结了挑战和策略。
共纳入 37 项综述。根据社区之间的相似性,将常见的挑战和策略分为 6 个关键主题领域:(1)个人对健康相关需求的取向,(2)个人对健康相关技术的取向,(3)个人的数字素养,(4)技术设计,(5)卫生系统结构和组织,以及(6)获得技术支持的医疗服务的社会和结构决定因素。我们为政策制定提出了 4 个重要方向:(1)投资数字健康素养教育和培训,(2)包容性数字医疗技术设计,(3)激励包容性数字医疗保健,以及(4)投资负担得起和可获得的基础设施。
服务不足人群群体在获得虚拟医疗方面所面临的挑战可能发生在个人、技术、卫生系统和社会/结构决定因素层面。尽管我们的综述所提出的政策方法在给定的政策背景下可能难以实现,但它们对于虚拟医疗的更公平未来至关重要。