• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉输液污染与输液管更换频率之间的关系。

The relationship between intravenous fluid contamination and the frequency of tubing replacement.

作者信息

Josephson A, Gombert M E, Sierra M F, Karanfil L V, Tansino G F

出版信息

Infect Control. 1985 Sep;6(9):367-70. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700063335.

DOI:10.1017/s0195941700063335
PMID:3932250
Abstract

Medical patients receiving IV therapy were randomly assigned to one of two IV tubing change groups. One group had a 48-hour tubing change and the other had no tubing change for the remainder of the cannula placement. A daily IV fluid specimen was processed microbiologically. To complete the study, a minimum of 3 continuous days of therapy and three fluid specimens was required. There were two contaminated specimens, one in each tubing change group. The contamination rate in the 48-hour change group was 0.87% and 0.96% in the no change group. The rate difference of 0.09% has a 95% confidence interval (-0.035 to +0.036) which includes zero. Survival analysis also revealed no significant difference in the cumulative probability of survival, however the mean duration of continuous tubing use of 4.3 days in the no change group and 1.8 days in the 48 hour change group were significantly different (p less than 0.05). The cumulative probability of surviving contamination free was 0.988 in the 48-hour group and 0.987 in the no-change group. We conclude that it is safe to change IV tubing at intervals up to but not exceeding 4 days.

摘要

接受静脉输液治疗的医学患者被随机分配到两个静脉输液管更换组中的一组。一组每48小时更换一次输液管,另一组在留置套管的剩余时间内不更换输液管。每天采集的静脉输液样本进行微生物学处理。为完成该研究,至少需要连续3天的治疗和三个液体样本。有两个受污染的样本,每个输液管更换组各一个。48小时更换组的污染率为0.87%,未更换组为0.96%。0.09%的率差的95%置信区间为(-0.035至+0.036),其中包括零。生存分析还显示生存累积概率无显著差异,然而,未更换组连续使用输液管的平均持续时间为4.3天,48小时更换组为1.8天,两者存在显著差异(p小于0.05)。48小时组无污染物存活的累积概率为0.988,未更换组为0.987。我们得出结论,间隔不超过4天更换静脉输液管是安全的。

相似文献

1
The relationship between intravenous fluid contamination and the frequency of tubing replacement.静脉输液污染与输液管更换频率之间的关系。
Infect Control. 1985 Sep;6(9):367-70. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700063335.
2
Intravenous tubing with burettes can be safely changed at 48-hour intervals.带有滴管的静脉输液管可每48小时安全更换一次。
JAMA. 1984 Apr 27;251(16):2112-5.
3
Preventing infection in intravenous therapy.预防静脉治疗中的感染。
Anesth Analg. 1977 Jan-Feb;56(1):141-53. doi: 10.1213/00000539-197701000-00036.
4
A randomized trial of 72- versus 24-hour intravenous tubing set changes in newborns receiving lipid therapy.接受脂质治疗的新生儿静脉输液管72小时更换与24小时更换的随机试验。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Jul;20(7):487-93. doi: 10.1086/501657.
5
Optimal frequency of changing intravenous administration sets: is it safe to prolong use beyond 72 hours?
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001 Mar;22(3):136-9. doi: 10.1086/501879.
6
Relationship between incidence of phlebitis and frequency of changing IV tubing and percutaneous site.静脉炎发生率与静脉输液管路及经皮穿刺部位更换频率之间的关系
Nurs Res. 1983 Jul-Aug;32(4):247-52.
7
Selecting an i.v. tubing system.
Infect Control. 1985 Sep;6(9):384-5. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700063372.
8
Intravenous tubing containing burettes can be safely changed at 72 hour intervals.带有滴管的静脉输液管可以每72小时安全更换一次。
Infect Control. 1987 Mar;8(3):113-6. doi: 10.1017/s019594170006728x.
9
Effects of high infusion pressure and large-bore tubing on intravenous flow rates.高输注压力和大口径输液管对静脉输液流速的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 1985 May;3(3):187-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(85)90085-3.
10
Tubing misconnections--a persistent and potentially deadly occurrence.管路误连——一种持续存在且可能致命的情况。
Jt Comm Perspect. 2006 May;26(5):14-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Extending the interval for changing flushing solutions for central venous and arterial line systems in the intensive care unit: An evidence-based quality improvement project.延长重症监护病房中心静脉和动脉管路系统冲洗液更换间隔时间:一项基于证据的质量改进项目。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e70034. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70034.
2
Stability of prostaglandin E solutions stored in polypropylene syringes for continuous intravenous administration to newborns.储存在聚丙烯注射器中用于新生儿持续静脉输注的前列腺素E溶液的稳定性。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Oct;25(e2):e109-e114. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001205. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
3
Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients-a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial).
血管内装置给药套件:住院患者标准使用与延长使用后的更换——一项随机对照试验的研究方案(RSVP试验)
BMJ Open. 2015 Feb 3;5(2):e007257. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007257.
4
Does decreasing the frequency of changing intravenous administration sets (>24 h) increase the incidence of sepsis in neonates receiving total parenteral nutrition?降低静脉给药装置的更换频率(>24小时)是否会增加接受全胃肠外营养的新生儿败血症的发生率?
Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Nov;17(9):501-4.
5
Optimal timing for intravascular administration set replacement.血管内给药装置更换的最佳时机。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 15;2013(9):CD003588. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003588.pub3.
6
Summary of recommendations: Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections.推荐摘要:血管内导管相关感染预防指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(9):1087-99. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir138.
7
Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.血管内导管相关感染预防指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(9):e162-93. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir257. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
8
Influence of tracheostomy on the incidence of central venous catheter-related bacteremia.气管切开术对中心静脉导管相关菌血症发生率的影响。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Sep;28(9):1141-5. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0742-4. Epub 2009 Apr 16.