Suppr超能文献

波多黎各儿童在认知评估系统中使用的策略及其与计划能力的关系。

Strategies Used by Puerto Rican Children in the Cognitive Assessment System and Their Relationship with Planning Performance.

作者信息

Cordero-Arroyo Giselle, Ramos-Carrasquillo José A, Cruz-Figueroa Imalay M, Báez-Ávila Loggina, Gonzalez-Gonzalez Manuel, Moreno-Torres Mary A, Bermonti-Pérez Mario E

机构信息

School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico.

Independent Researcher, San Juan 00926, Puerto Rico.

出版信息

J Intell. 2024 Sep 21;12(9):90. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12090090.

Abstract

Studies involving the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) planning scale typically use only the subtest and scale scores without assessing the strategies employed by the participants. This study addressed this gap and examined the planning strategies used by children in the CAS2: Spanish version and their relationship with planning performance. We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study with 26 Puerto Rican children aged 8 to 11. Results showed that no strategies were consistently used by participants according to examinees' reports ( = 0-46%), but examiners observed consistent use of some strategies such as "coded left to right, top to bottom", = 92%; "scanned the page for the next number or letter", = 100%. Welch's -tests did not show relationships between participants' performance and the strategies observed by examiners, | mean differences | = 0.05-0.81, s ≥ 0.05, nor with the strategies reported by participants, | mean differences | = 0.05-1.69, s ≥ 0.05. These findings suggest that although the examiners may observe the use of strategies, the examinees are unaware of the strategies they use, and the strategies used are not associated with their performance. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

涉及认知评估系统(CAS)计划量表的研究通常只使用子测验和量表分数,而不评估参与者所采用的策略。本研究弥补了这一空白,考察了儿童在《认知评估系统第二版:西班牙语版》中使用的计划策略及其与计划表现的关系。我们对26名8至11岁的波多黎各儿童进行了一项探索性横断面研究。结果显示,根据受测者的报告,没有策略被一致使用(使用率 = 0 - 46%),但主试观察到一些策略被一致使用,如“从左到右、从上到下编码”,使用率 = 92%;“在页面上扫描下一个数字或字母”,使用率 = 100%。韦尔奇t检验未显示参与者的表现与主试观察到的策略之间存在关联,|平均差异| = 0.05 - 0.81,p≥0.05,也未显示与受测者报告的策略之间存在关联,|平均差异| = 0.05 - 1.69,p≥0.05。这些发现表明,尽管主试可能观察到策略的使用,但受测者并未意识到自己所使用的策略,且所使用的策略与他们的表现无关。未来需要进一步研究以证实这些发现。

相似文献

2
Deconstructing Cognitive Heterogeneity in Puerto Rican Spanish-Speaking Children With ADHD.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Aug;26(7):714-724. doi: 10.1017/S135561772000020X. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
5
Differences in fatigue severity in a sample of adult cancer patients.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Sep;27(17-18):3345-3354. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13840. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
7
Epidemiological comparisons of Puerto Rican and U.S. mainland children: parent, teacher, and self-reports.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1990 Jan;29(1):84-93. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199001000-00014.

本文引用的文献

1
PASS Theory of Intelligence and Its Measurement Using the Cognitive Assessment System, 2nd Edition.
J Intell. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):77. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12080077.
3
The effect of cognitive ability on academic achievement: The mediating role of self-discipline and the moderating role of planning.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 6;13:1014655. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1014655. eCollection 2022.
4
Development of Metacognition in Adolescence: The Congruency-Based Metacognition Scale.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 6;11:565231. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565231. eCollection 2020.
5
The Structure of Speed of Processing Across Cultures.
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2018 Sep 30;14(3):112-125. doi: 10.5709/acp-0243-7. eCollection 2018.
6
Effectiveness of a cognitive strategy intervention in improving arithmetic computation based on the PASS theory.
J Learn Disabil. 2000 Nov-Dec;33(6):591-7. doi: 10.1177/002221940003300607.
7
Planning versus speed: an experimental examination of what Planned Codes of the Cognitive Assessment System measures.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004 Mar;19(2):313-7. doi: 10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00027-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验