Festino Emanuel, Papale Olga, Di Rocco Francesca, De Maio Marianna, Cortis Cristina, Fusco Andrea
Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Viale dell'Università, 03043 Cassino, Italy.
Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Sports (Basel). 2024 Sep 20;12(9):260. doi: 10.3390/sports12090260.
This study aimed to evaluate whether the type and degree of physical activity commitment (i.e., team sport athletes, highly active individuals, sedentary behavior) influence body image and exercise behavior. A total of 96 participants (46 women and 50 men; age: 22.7 ± 2.7 years; height: 170 ± 8.6 cm; weight: 67.6 ± 10.8 kg) were divided in six groups: female volleyball and male football players (student athletes classified as Tier 2), highly physically active women and men, with high sitting time completed the Body Image Dimensional Assessment and the 21-item Exercise Dependence Scale to evaluate body dissatisfaction and level of dependency on exercise. The Body Image Dimensional Assessment is a silhouette-based scale, where three direct indices are derived from the participants' responses: body dissatisfaction, sexual body dissatisfaction, and comparative body dissatisfaction. The Exercise Dependence Scale is a six-point Likert scale that evaluates seven dimensions of exercise dependence (tolerance, withdrawal, intention effects, lack of control, time, reductions in other activities, and continuance) and provides an overall score. A multivariate analysis of variance was used to examine the effects of different levels of physical activity, team sport participation (volleyball and football), and sedentary behavior (i.e., high sitting time) on participants' body image indices and dimensions of exercise dependence according to sex. Volleyball players showed significantly higher body dissatisfaction than football players ( = 0.99) and the physically active men group ( = 2.31), who had lower values than sedentary women group ( = 1.68). Football players had lower comparative body dissatisfaction values than volleyball players ( = 1.70) and sedentary women ( = 1.69), who had higher values than sedentary men ( = 1.04). Sedentary women had a significantly lower exercise dependence scale score than volleyball players ( = 1.71), football players ( = 1.12), and physically active men ( = 1.21). The findings highlight the impact of regular physical activity on body dissatisfaction and the variance in body image perceptions between the sexes. Moreover, the high exercise dependence values found in volleyball and football players and physically active men suggest an effect of intense training and maladaptive exercise behaviors, underlining the need for comprehensive strategies to address exercise dependence.
本研究旨在评估身体活动投入的类型和程度(即团队运动运动员、高活跃个体、久坐行为)是否会影响身体形象和运动行为。共有96名参与者(46名女性和50名男性;年龄:22.7±2.7岁;身高:170±8.6厘米;体重:67.6±10.8千克)被分为六组:女排和男足运动员(被归类为二级的学生运动员)、高身体活动水平的女性和男性、久坐时间长的女性和男性,他们完成了身体形象维度评估和21项运动依赖量表,以评估身体不满和运动依赖程度。身体形象维度评估是一种基于轮廓的量表,从参与者的回答中得出三个直接指标:身体不满、性身体不满和比较性身体不满。运动依赖量表是一个六点李克特量表,评估运动依赖的七个维度(耐受性、戒断反应、意图效应、缺乏控制、时间、其他活动减少和持续性)并提供一个总分。采用多变量方差分析来检验不同水平的身体活动、团队运动参与(排球和足球)以及久坐行为(即久坐时间长)对参与者身体形象指标和按性别划分的运动依赖维度的影响。排球运动员的身体不满程度显著高于足球运动员(=0.99)和高身体活动水平的男性组(=2.31),后两者的值低于久坐女性组(=1.68)。足球运动员的比较性身体不满值低于排球运动员(=1.70)和久坐女性(=1.69),后两者的值高于久坐男性(=1.04)。久坐女性的运动依赖量表得分显著低于排球运动员(=1.71)、足球运动员(=1.12)和高身体活动水平的男性(=1.21)。研究结果突出了规律身体活动对身体不满的影响以及性别之间身体形象认知的差异。此外,在排球和足球运动员以及高身体活动水平的男性中发现的高运动依赖值表明了高强度训练和适应不良运动行为所产生的影响,强调了需要采取综合策略来解决运动依赖问题。