• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用人口多样性:寻找行业工具。

Harnessing population diversity: in search of tools of the trade.

机构信息

MNI-Montreal Neurological Institute, Department of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada.

MILA-Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute, Montreal H2S 3H1, Canada.

出版信息

Gigascience. 2024 Jan 2;13. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giae068.

DOI:10.1093/gigascience/giae068
PMID:39331809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11427908/
Abstract

Big neuroscience datasets are not big small datasets when it comes to quantitative data analysis. Neuroscience has now witnessed the advent of many population cohort studies that deep-profile participants, yielding hundreds of measures, capturing dimensions of each individual's position in the broader society. Indeed, there is a rebalancing from small, strictly selected, and thus homogenized cohorts toward always larger, more representative, and thus diverse cohorts. This shift in cohort composition is prompting the revision of incumbent modeling practices. Major sources of population stratification increasingly overshadow the subtle effects that neuroscientists are typically studying. In our opinion, as we sample individuals from always wider diversity backgrounds, we will require a new stack of quantitative tools to realize diversity-aware modeling. We here take inventory of candidate analytical frameworks. Better incorporating driving factors behind population structure will allow refining our understanding of how brain-behavior relationships depend on human subgroups.

摘要

当涉及到定量数据分析时,大型神经科学数据集并不是小数据集。神经科学现在已经见证了许多群体队列研究的出现,这些研究深入分析参与者,产生数百种测量结果,捕捉每个个体在更广泛社会中的位置的各个维度。实际上,正在从规模小、严格选择的、因此同质化的队列向始终更大、更具代表性的、因此更多样化的队列进行重新平衡。这种队列组成的转变促使对现有建模实践进行修订。人口分层的主要来源越来越多地掩盖了神经科学家通常研究的微妙影响。在我们看来,随着我们从越来越广泛的多样性背景中抽样个体,我们将需要一套新的定量工具来实现对多样性的建模。在这里,我们列出了候选分析框架。更好地纳入人口结构背后的驱动因素将使我们能够更深入地了解脑-行为关系如何取决于人类亚组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a83/11427908/517290e32b42/giae068fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a83/11427908/324d0342bda4/giae068fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a83/11427908/0e6935a0e3cf/giae068fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a83/11427908/693a6e381ff2/giae068fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a83/11427908/69265f993e21/giae068fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a83/11427908/517290e32b42/giae068fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a83/11427908/324d0342bda4/giae068fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a83/11427908/0e6935a0e3cf/giae068fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a83/11427908/693a6e381ff2/giae068fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a83/11427908/69265f993e21/giae068fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a83/11427908/517290e32b42/giae068fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Harnessing population diversity: in search of tools of the trade.利用人口多样性:寻找行业工具。
Gigascience. 2024 Jan 2;13. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giae068.
2
Finding the needle in a high-dimensional haystack: Canonical correlation analysis for neuroscientists.在高维干草堆中寻找针:神经科学家的典型相关分析。
Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 1;216:116745. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116745. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
3
Big data from small data: data-sharing in the 'long tail' of neuroscience.从小数据到大数据:神经科学“长尾”中的数据共享。
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Nov;17(11):1442-7. doi: 10.1038/nn.3838.
4
Quantitative skills in undergraduate neuroscience education in the age of big data.大数据时代的本科神经科学教育中的定量技能。
Neurosci Lett. 2021 Aug 10;759:136074. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136074. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
5
Exploration, Inference, and Prediction in Neuroscience and Biomedicine.神经科学与生物医学中的探索、推理和预测。
Trends Neurosci. 2019 Apr;42(4):251-262. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
6
The roles of supervised machine learning in systems neuroscience.监督机器学习在系统神经科学中的作用。
Prog Neurobiol. 2019 Apr;175:126-137. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
7
Cognitive neuroscience 2.0: building a cumulative science of human brain function.认知神经科学 2.0:构建人类大脑功能的累积科学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov;14(11):489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
8
On the other hand: including left-handers in cognitive neuroscience and neurogenetics.另一方面:将左撇子纳入认知神经科学和神经遗传学的研究中。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Mar;15(3):193-201. doi: 10.1038/nrn3679. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
9
Using machine learning to explain the heterogeneity of schizophrenia. Realizing the promise and avoiding the hype.利用机器学习解释精神分裂症的异质性。实现承诺,避免炒作。
Schizophr Res. 2019 Dec;214:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.08.032. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
Web service makes big data available to neuroscientists.网络服务使神经科学家能够获取大数据。
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):143. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07195-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent brain subtypes of chronotype reveal unique behavioral and health profiles: an across-cohort validation.生物钟类型的潜在脑亚型揭示独特行为和健康特征:跨队列验证
Res Sq. 2025 Jul 29:rs.3.rs-7032529. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7032529/v1.
2
Carriers of pathogenic variants show a milder, anatomically distinct brain signature of Parkinson's disease.携带致病变体的个体表现出一种较为轻微、在解剖学上有明显差异的帕金森病脑部特征。
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 10:2025.03.09.25323610. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.09.25323610.

本文引用的文献

1
Disentangling Socioeconomic Status and Race in Infant Brain, Birth Weight, and Gestational Age at Birth: A Neural Network Analysis.解析婴儿大脑、出生体重和出生时孕周中的社会经济地位与种族:神经网络分析
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023 May 22;4(1):135-144. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.05.001. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Mapping human brain charts cross-sectionally and longitudinally.横向和纵向绘制人类大脑图谱。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 16;120(20):e2216798120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216798120. Epub 2023 May 8.
3
Single-cell analysis reveals inflammatory interactions driving macular degeneration.
单细胞分析揭示了炎症相互作用驱动黄斑变性。
Nat Commun. 2023 May 5;14(1):2589. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37025-7.
4
Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses.英国生物库中的参与偏差扭曲了遗传关联和下游分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jul;7(7):1216-1227. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01579-9. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
5
The end game: respecting major sources of population diversity.最终目标:尊重人口多样性的主要来源。
Nat Methods. 2023 Aug;20(8):1122-1128. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01812-3.
6
Racial Disparities in Adversity During Childhood and the False Appearance of Race-Related Differences in Brain Structure.儿童期逆境中的种族差异与大脑结构中种族相关差异的虚假表象。
Am J Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 1;180(2):127-138. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.21090961.
7
A saturated map of common genetic variants associated with human height.与人类身高相关的常见遗传变异的饱和图谱。
Nature. 2022 Oct;610(7933):704-712. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05275-y. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
8
Comparing clinical trial population representativeness to real-world populations: an external validity analysis encompassing 43 895 trials and 5 685 738 individuals across 989 unique drugs and 286 conditions in England.比较临床试验人群代表性与真实世界人群:一项涵盖英国989种独特药物和286种病症的43895项试验及5685738名个体的外部有效性分析。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Oct;3(10):e674-e689. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00186-6. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
9
Endorsing Complexity Through Diversity: Computational Psychiatry Meets Big Data Analytics.通过多样性认可复杂性:计算精神病学与大数据分析相遇
Biol Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 15;93(8):655-657. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.07.023. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
10
Sex differences in the human brain: a roadmap for more careful analysis and interpretation of a biological reality.人类大脑中的性别差异:更仔细地分析和解释生物现实的路线图。
Biol Sex Differ. 2022 Jul 26;13(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13293-022-00448-w.