Health Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, 1 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308205, Singapore.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22145. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73272-4.
The association of health-related productivity loss (HRPL) with social isolation and depressive symptoms is not well studied. We aimed to examine the association of social isolation and depressive symptoms with productivity loss. Data on employed adults aged 21 years and above were derived from the Population Health Index (PHI) study conducted by the National Healthcare Group (NHG) on community-dwelling adults, residing in the Central and Northern residential areas of Singapore. The severity of depressive symptoms and social isolation were assessed using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Lubben Social Network Scale-6 (LSNS-6) respectively. Productivity loss was assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). We used Generalised Linear Models, with family gamma, log link for the analysis. Models were adjusted for socio-demographic variables (including age, gender, ethnicity, employment status, housing type) and self-reported chronic conditions (including the presence of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia). There were 2,605 working (2,143 full-time) adults in this study. The median reported percentage of unadjusted productivity loss was 0.0%, 10.0% and 20.0% for participants with social isolation, depressive symptoms, and both, respectively. In the regression analysis, mean productivity loss scores were 2.81 times (95% Confidence Interval: 2.12, 3.72) higher in participants with depressive symptoms than those without. On the other hand, social isolation was not found to be associated with productivity loss scores (1.17, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.96, 1.42). The interaction term of depressive symptoms with social isolation was statistically significant, with an effect size of 1.89 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.04, 3.44). It appeared that productivity loss was amplified when social isolation and depressive symptoms were concomitant. Our results suggested significant associations of social isolation and depressive symptoms with productivity loss. These findings highlighted the potential impact of social isolation and depressive symptoms on work performance and drew attention to the importance of having a holistic work support system that promotes social connectedness, mental wellbeing and work productivity.
健康相关生产力损失(HRPL)与社会隔离和抑郁症状的关联尚未得到充分研究。我们旨在研究社会隔离和抑郁症状与生产力损失之间的关联。这项研究的数据来自国家医疗保健集团(NHG)针对居住在新加坡中部和北部地区的社区成年人进行的人口健康指数(PHI)研究,参与者为 21 岁及以上的在职成年人。抑郁症状和社会隔离的严重程度分别使用 9 项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)和卢本社会网络量表-6(LSNS-6)进行评估。生产力损失使用工作生产力和活动障碍问卷(WPAI)进行评估。我们使用广义线性模型,家族伽马分布,对数链接进行分析。模型调整了社会人口统计学变量(包括年龄、性别、种族、就业状况、住房类型)和自我报告的慢性疾病(包括糖尿病、高血压和血脂异常)。这项研究共有 2605 名在职(2143 名全职)成年人。未经调整的生产力损失报告百分比中位数分别为 0.0%、10.0%和 20.0%,参与者分别存在社会隔离、抑郁症状和两者兼有。在回归分析中,与没有抑郁症状的参与者相比,有抑郁症状的参与者的平均生产力损失评分高出 2.81 倍(95%置信区间:2.12,3.72)。另一方面,社会隔离与生产力损失评分无关(1.17,95%置信区间:0.96,1.42)。抑郁症状与社会隔离的交互项具有统计学意义,效应量为 1.89(95%置信区间:1.04,3.44)。似乎当社会隔离和抑郁症状同时存在时,生产力损失会加剧。我们的研究结果表明,社会隔离和抑郁症状与生产力损失之间存在显著关联。这些发现强调了社会隔离和抑郁症状对工作表现的潜在影响,并提醒人们注意建立一个全面的工作支持系统的重要性,该系统促进社交联系、心理健康和工作生产力。