Iwate Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Iwate Medical University, 1-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Shiwa, Iwate, 028-3694, Japan.
Department of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 15;21(1):925. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10896-5.
Social isolation and mental health issues have become a severe problem in disaster areas in the Great East Japan Earthquake. This study examined whether the combination of the house damage and social isolation or the combination of the death of family members and social isolation is associated with depressive symptoms among survivors using the baseline study data of the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Community-Based Cohort Study (TMM CommCohort Study).
We used cross-sectional data from a baseline survey of 48,958 participants (18,423 males, 30,535 females; aged 60.1 ± 11.2 years) to examine the association between social isolation measured by the Lubben social network scale 6 (LSNS-6) and depressive symptoms measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depressive Scale (CES-D). The presence of social isolation and depressive symptoms was defined by an LSNS-6 score of < 12 and a CES-D score of ≥16, respectively. We performed a logistic regression analysis to determine the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) [AOR (95% CI)] for depressive symptoms according to sex in the social isolation in comparison to without social isolation, and the associations of the combination of the house damage or the death of family members and social isolation and depressive symptoms.
Social isolation was significantly associated with depressive symptoms (males: OR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.72-2.04, females: OR = 2.13; 95% CI = 2.00-2.26). Both males and females respondents with severe house damage and social isolation had a greater risk of depressive symptoms in comparison to those with an undamaged house and without social isolation (males: OR = 3.40; 95% CI = 2.73-4.24, females: OR = 2.92; 95% CI = 2.46-3.46). The risk of depressive symptoms was also higher in both males and females respondents with the death of family members and social isolation in comparison to those without the death of family members and without social isolation (males: OR = 2.18; 95% CI = 1.90-2.50, females: OR = 2.60; 95% CI = 2.35-2.88).
The findings suggested that a combination of social isolation and severe house damage and the death of family members caused by a large-scale natural disaster was associated with a higher risk of depressive symptoms although the interaction was not statistically significant.
社交隔离和心理健康问题已成为日本东部大地震灾区的严重问题。本研究使用东北医科大学巨型医学数据库社区队列研究(TMM CommCohort 研究)的基线研究数据,检验了房屋受损和社交隔离的组合或家庭成员死亡和社交隔离的组合与幸存者抑郁症状之间的关系。
我们使用了来自 48958 名参与者(男性 18423 名,女性 30535 名;年龄 60.1±11.2 岁)的基线调查的横断面数据,使用 Lubben 社会网络量表 6(LSNS-6)衡量社交隔离,并使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)衡量抑郁症状。通过 LSNS-6 评分<12 和 CES-D 评分≥16 分别定义社交隔离和抑郁症状的存在。我们进行了 logistic 回归分析,以确定与没有社交隔离相比,在社会隔离中,男性和女性的抑郁症状的多变量调整比值比(95%置信区间)[调整比值比(95%置信区间)](AOR(95%CI))。我们还检验了房屋受损或家庭成员死亡与社交隔离相结合与抑郁症状之间的关联。
社交隔离与抑郁症状显著相关(男性:OR=1.87;95%CI=1.72-2.04,女性:OR=2.13;95%CI=2.00-2.26)。与房屋未受损且无社交隔离的人相比,房屋严重受损且有社交隔离的男性和女性受访者患抑郁症状的风险更高(男性:OR=3.40;95%CI=2.73-4.24,女性:OR=2.92;95%CI=2.46-3.46)。与没有家庭成员死亡且没有社交隔离的人相比,男性和女性受访者有家庭成员死亡且有社交隔离的抑郁症状风险也更高(男性:OR=2.18;95%CI=1.90-2.50,女性:OR=2.60;95%CI=2.35-2.88)。
研究结果表明,尽管没有统计学意义上的相互作用,但大规模自然灾害导致的社交隔离与严重房屋受损和家庭成员死亡的结合与更高的抑郁症状风险相关。