The effect of thermal aging on microhardness and SEM/EDS for characterisation bioactive filling materials.

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the surface microhardness, surface chemical composition of bioactive restorative materials pre- and post- thermal aging.

METHOD

A total of 200 disc-shaped samples were prepared by using the materials: Cention N, ACTIVA BioActive Restorative, Equia Forte HT Fil, Glass Fill glass carbomer cement (GCP), and Fuji II LC. Vickers microhardness test were used to measure surface hardness. Scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) was used to determine the characterization of the microstructures and elemental analysis of the materials. These measurements were repeated after thermal aging. One-Way ANOVA test, Bonferroni test and the Games-Howell test was used for data analysis. The significance level was accepted as 0.05.

RESULTS

Cention N had the highest vickers microhardness value before thermal cycle. The highest fluoride ion ratio among the materials before thermal aging was detected in the Equia Forte HT Fil and Fuji II LC groups. While a decrease in fluorideF ion was detected in all groups except the Cention N group after thermal aging. It is observed that ACTIVA BioActive Restorative has a more microporous and rougher surface in the scanning electron microscopy image after the thermal cycle than in the image before the thermal cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

The chemical properties of the materials and the properties of the filler particles may be related to the differences in the mechanical properties, surface characterizations and ion releases of the materials Thermal aging affected the microhardness, surface characteristics and elemental mass ratios of the studied materials. Alkasite bioactive materials are more similar to composite restorative materials and show better mechanical properties than other materials, but do not have the same effect on fluoride release.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Most of the bioactive materials showed a decrease in the fluoride ion ratio after thermal aging, while no difference was found in the ion exchange of alkasite materials. Material selection should be made more carefully in caries-active individuals whose fluoride release is clinically important.