• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

元记忆中的自我参照效应以及信念在这一过程中的作用。

The Self-Reference Effect in Metamemory and the Role of Beliefs in This Process.

作者信息

Hou Ruoyu, Xu Hui, Gao Yuanxia, Tang Weihai, Liu Xiping

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 25;14(9):741. doi: 10.3390/bs14090741.

DOI:10.3390/bs14090741
PMID:39335957
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11429202/
Abstract

Previous research has shown a clear self-reference effect in our memory. However, the question arises as to whether this effect could extend to higher cognitive domains such as metamemory. Thus, this study examined the effects of different encoding types on judgments of learning (JOLs) and explored the role of beliefs in this process. A one-way (encoding type: semantic, self-referential) within-participants design was employed in Experiment 1, which found no self-reference effect in JOLs. In Experiment 2, we manipulated participants' beliefs to explore their effect on JOLs under different encoding strategies. The results showed that learners' metamemory beliefs about encoding types influence JOLs. Learners who believed that self-referential and semantic encoding had the same memory effect tended to give equal JOLs to both words. However, learners who believed that self-referential encoding had a better memory effect than semantic encoding gave higher JOLs to self-referentially encoded words. The conclusions are as follows: There is no self-reference effect in JOLs, but learners' metamemory beliefs about encoding types influence JOLs.

摘要

先前的研究已表明,我们的记忆中存在明显的自我参照效应。然而,问题在于这种效应是否能扩展到诸如元记忆等更高层次的认知领域。因此,本研究考察了不同编码类型对学习判断(JOLs)的影响,并探讨了信念在此过程中的作用。实验1采用了被试内单因素设计(编码类型:语义、自我参照),结果发现JOLs中不存在自我参照效应。在实验2中,我们操纵了被试的信念,以探究其在不同编码策略下对JOLs的影响。结果表明,学习者关于编码类型的元记忆信念会影响JOLs。那些认为自我参照编码和语义编码具有相同记忆效果的学习者,往往会对这两种类型的单词给出相同的JOLs。然而,那些认为自我参照编码比语义编码具有更好记忆效果的学习者,则会对自我参照编码的单词给出更高的JOLs。研究结论如下:JOLs中不存在自我参照效应,但学习者关于编码类型的元记忆信念会影响JOLs。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e07/11429202/6c12ad7370bb/behavsci-14-00741-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e07/11429202/aa6604c8bdee/behavsci-14-00741-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e07/11429202/17f2970e0857/behavsci-14-00741-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e07/11429202/6c12ad7370bb/behavsci-14-00741-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e07/11429202/aa6604c8bdee/behavsci-14-00741-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e07/11429202/17f2970e0857/behavsci-14-00741-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e07/11429202/6c12ad7370bb/behavsci-14-00741-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Self-Reference Effect in Metamemory and the Role of Beliefs in This Process.元记忆中的自我参照效应以及信念在这一过程中的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 25;14(9):741. doi: 10.3390/bs14090741.
2
How Much Do Metamemory Beliefs Contribute to the Font-Size Effect in Judgments of Learning?元记忆信念在学习判断中的字号效应中起到了多大作用?
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 10;10(11):e0142351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142351. eCollection 2015.
3
How cognitive conflict affects judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of processing fluency and metamemory beliefs.认知冲突如何影响学习判断:评估加工流畅性和元记忆信念的贡献。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jul;49(5):912-922. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01143-8. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
Perceptual Fluency Affects Judgments of Learning Non-analytically and Analytically Through Beliefs About How Perceptual Fluency Affects Memory.知觉流畅性通过关于知觉流畅性如何影响记忆的信念,非分析性地和分析性地影响学习判断。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 2;11:552824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552824. eCollection 2020.
5
Do Beliefs About Font Size Affect Retrospective Metamemory Judgments in Addition to Prospective Judgments?除了前瞻性判断外,关于字体大小的信念是否还会影响回顾性元记忆判断?
Exp Psychol. 2022 May;69(3):172-184. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000549. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
6
Word frequency effects on judgments of learning: More than just beliefs.词频对学习判断的影响:不仅仅是信念。
J Gen Psychol. 2021 Apr-Jun;148(2):124-148. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2019.1706073. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
7
The effect of animacy on metamemory.生命性对元记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Jul;44(5):696-705. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0598-7.
8
The influence of visual mental imagery size on metamemory accuracy in judgment of learning.视觉心理意象大小对学习判断中元记忆准确性的影响。
Memory. 2017 Feb;25(2):244-253. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1153658. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
9
Letter Spacing Does not Affect Memory and Metamemory.字母间距不影响记忆和元记忆。
Psychol Rep. 2025 Jun;128(3):2055-2070. doi: 10.1177/00332941231178466. Epub 2023 May 30.
10
The Effect of Word Frequency on Judgments of Learning: Contributions of Beliefs and Processing Fluency.词频对学习判断的影响:信念与加工流畅性的作用
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 6;6:1995. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01995. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
The Self-reference Effect Can Modulate Language Syntactic Processing Even Without Explicit Awareness: An Electroencephalography Study.自指效应对语言句法加工的调制作用无需意识参与:一项脑电研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Mar 1;36(3):460-474. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02104.
2
Item-specific and relational encoding are effective at reducing the illusion of competence.项目特异性和关系编码在降低能力错觉方面是有效的。
Psychol Res. 2024 Apr;88(3):1023-1044. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01891-z. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
3
My child and I: self- and child-reference effects among parents with self-worth contingent on children's performance.
父母的自我价值取决于孩子的表现:有自我价值条件作用的父母的自我及子女参照效应。
Memory. 2023 Oct;31(9):1244-1257. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2254029. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
4
Put you in the problem: Effects of self-pronouns on mathematical problem-solving.设你处于问题情境中:自我代词对数学问题解决的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Feb;77(2):308-325. doi: 10.1177/17470218231174229. Epub 2023 May 23.
5
Self-reference modulates the perception of visual apparent motion.自我参照调节视觉似动知觉。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jan;85(1):188-195. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02620-1. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
6
People hold mood-congruent beliefs about memory but do not use these beliefs when monitoring their learning.人们对记忆持有与情绪一致的信念,但在监控自己的学习时却不会使用这些信念。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Apr;48(4):499-519. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001096. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
7
On the pervasive effect of word frequency in metamemory.论词频在元记忆中的普遍影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Aug;75(8):1411-1427. doi: 10.1177/17470218211053329. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
8
Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning.后见之明偏差在元记忆中的表现:结果知识影响学习判断的再认。
Memory. 2021 May;29(5):559-572. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1919144. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
9
On stopping yourself: Self-relevance facilitates response inhibition.停止自我:自我相关性促进反应抑制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1416-1423. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02248-7. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
Does word frequency influence judgments of learning (JOLs)? A meta-analytic review.词汇频率是否会影响学习判断(JOL)?一项元分析综述。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2020 Dec;74(4):346-353. doi: 10.1037/cep0000206. Epub 2020 Mar 19.