Suppr超能文献

探索平等主义:平等主义的概念与方法综述及其对积极群体间关系的影响

Exploring Egalitarianism: A Conceptual and Methodological Review of Egalitarianism and Impacts on Positive Intergroup Relations.

作者信息

Waldrop Rachael J, Warren Meg A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA.

Department of Management, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 19;14(9):842. doi: 10.3390/bs14090842.

Abstract

Considerable research on intergroup relations emphasizes attitudes, motivations, and emotions that lead to the reduction of prejudice. While factors that actively promote positive intergroup interactions have been emerging, a central theoretical framework has not been formally proposed. To address this gap, we engaged a positive psychology lens to explore how researchers have defined key indicators and consider the positive counterparts of traditional prejudice-reduction models to begin building a new framework of egalitarianism. After scanning 16,840 records that emerged in PsycInfo using keywords "egalitarian", "non-prejudice", and "intergroup", we assessed 158 articles for eligibility. Among the relevant articles (N = 54), we analyzed authors' definitions, methods of measurement, types of processes, and outcomes associated with egalitarian values as they related to intergroup behavior. Overall, there was notable variability in how researchers conceptualized and studied egalitarianism. We discuss the five broad categories of egalitarianism (prejudice reduction, universal orientation, concern for others, positive expression, and low social dominance orientation) and how they relate to positive or negative and approach or avoidant outcomes. Through these findings, we urge scholars to utilize a centralized model for studying egalitarianism in intergroup contexts moving forward.

摘要

大量关于群体间关系的研究强调了导致偏见减少的态度、动机和情感。虽然积极促进积极群体间互动的因素不断涌现,但尚未正式提出一个核心理论框架。为了填补这一空白,我们运用积极心理学的视角来探讨研究人员如何定义关键指标,并考虑传统偏见减少模型的积极对应物,以开始构建一个新的平等主义框架。在使用关键词“平等主义”、“无偏见”和“群体间”在PsycInfo中搜索出的16,840条记录中,我们评估了158篇文章的适用性。在相关文章(N = 54)中,我们分析了作者对与群体间行为相关的平等主义价值观的定义、测量方法、过程类型和结果。总体而言,研究人员在如何概念化和研究平等主义方面存在显著差异。我们讨论了平等主义的五大类别(偏见减少、普遍取向、关心他人、积极表达和低社会支配取向)以及它们与积极或消极以及趋近或回避结果的关系。通过这些发现,我们敦促学者们在未来研究群体间背景下的平等主义时采用一个集中的模型。

相似文献

4
Children's Intergroup Relations and Attitudes.儿童的群体间关系与态度。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2016;51:131-69. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Intergroup time bias and aversive racism in the medical context.医学背景下的群体间时间偏见和厌恶型种族主义。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Jul;127(1):104-131. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000446. Epub 2023 Dec 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验