• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Exploring Egalitarianism: A Conceptual and Methodological Review of Egalitarianism and Impacts on Positive Intergroup Relations.探索平等主义:平等主义的概念与方法综述及其对积极群体间关系的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 19;14(9):842. doi: 10.3390/bs14090842.
2
Egalitarianism and Sexual Prejudice: the Role of Ingroup Distinctiveness Motives.平等主义与性偏见:内群体独特性动机的作用。
Span J Psychol. 2015 Oct 13;18:E80. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.80.
3
Detecting Prejudice From Egalitarianism: Why Black Americans Don't Trust White Egalitarians' Claims.从平等主义者身上察觉偏见:为何美国黑人不相信白人平等主义者的主张。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Jun;33(6):889-905. doi: 10.1177/09567976211054090. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
4
Children's Intergroup Relations and Attitudes.儿童的群体间关系与态度。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2016;51:131-69. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
5
Neural basis of preference for human social hierarchy versus egalitarianism.人类对社会等级制度与平等主义偏好的神经基础。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jun;1167:174-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04508.x.
6
Intergroup contact, social dominance, and environmental concern: A test of the cognitive-liberalization hypothesis.群体间接触、社会支配和环境关注:对认知解放假说的检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jun;118(6):1146-1164. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000196. Epub 2019 May 23.
7
Routes to positive interracial interactions: approaching egalitarianism or avoiding prejudice.走向积极的 interracial 互动的途径:追求平等主义还是避免偏见。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;36(9):1135-47. doi: 10.1177/0146167210378018. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
8
How can intergroup interaction be bad if intergroup contact is good? Exploring and reconciling an apparent paradox in the science of intergroup relations.如果群体间接触是有益的,那么群体间互动怎么会是有害的呢?探索并调和群体间关系科学中一个明显的悖论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 May;10(3):307-27. doi: 10.1177/1745691614568482.
9
Specific emotions as mediators of the effect of intergroup contact on prejudice: findings across multiple participant and target groups.特定情绪作为群体间接触对偏见影响的中介因素:来自多个参与者和目标群体的研究结果
Cogn Emot. 2017 Aug;31(5):923-936. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1182893. Epub 2016 May 20.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Diversity? Great for Most Just Less So for Me: How Cognitive Abstraction Affects Diversity Attitudes and Choices.多样性?对大多数人来说很棒,对我来说则不然:认知抽象如何影响对多样性的态度和选择。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 27;15(5):585. doi: 10.3390/bs15050585.

本文引用的文献

1
Intergroup time bias and aversive racism in the medical context.医学背景下的群体间时间偏见和厌恶型种族主义。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Jul;127(1):104-131. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000446. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
2
The aversive bystander effect whereby egalitarian bystanders overestimate the confrontation of prejudice.厌恶旁观者效应,即平等主义旁观者高估了偏见的对抗。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 29;13(1):10538. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37601-3.
3
Detecting Prejudice From Egalitarianism: Why Black Americans Don't Trust White Egalitarians' Claims.从平等主义者身上察觉偏见:为何美国黑人不相信白人平等主义者的主张。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Jun;33(6):889-905. doi: 10.1177/09567976211054090. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
4
The EThIC Model of Virtue-Based Allyship Development: A New Approach to Equity and Inclusion in Organizations.基于美德的盟友关系发展的EThIC模型:组织中实现公平与包容的新方法。
J Bus Ethics. 2023;182(3):783-803. doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-05002-z. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
5
Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups.超越盟友关系:优势群体成员为弱势群体采取行动的动机。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;24(4):291-315. doi: 10.1177/1088868320918698. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Internal motivation to respond without prejudice fosters respectful responses in interracial interactions.内在动机促进了在跨种族互动中无偏见的回应,从而产生了尊重的回应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Nov;119(5):1037-1056. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000219. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
7
Socialization and well-being in multiracial individuals: A moderated mediation model of racial ambiguity and identity.多民族个体的社会化和幸福感:种族模糊性和身份认同的中介调节模型。
J Couns Psychol. 2018 Jul;65(4):413-422. doi: 10.1037/cou0000277.
8
(Anti-)egalitarianism differentially predicts empathy for members of advantaged versus disadvantaged groups.(反)平等主义者对处于优势和劣势群体的成员的同理心存在差异预测。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 May;114(5):665-692. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000112.
9
"You're one of us": Black Americans' use of hypodescent and its association with egalitarianism.“你是我们中的一员”:美国黑人使用杂种婚和其与平等主义的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Nov;113(5):753-768. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000107. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
10
Beyond one-size-fits-all: Tailoring diversity approaches to the representation of social groups.超越一刀切:为社会群体的代表性量身定制多元化方法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Oct;111(4):547-66. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000071. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

探索平等主义:平等主义的概念与方法综述及其对积极群体间关系的影响

Exploring Egalitarianism: A Conceptual and Methodological Review of Egalitarianism and Impacts on Positive Intergroup Relations.

作者信息

Waldrop Rachael J, Warren Meg A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA.

Department of Management, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 19;14(9):842. doi: 10.3390/bs14090842.

DOI:10.3390/bs14090842
PMID:39336057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11429248/
Abstract

Considerable research on intergroup relations emphasizes attitudes, motivations, and emotions that lead to the reduction of prejudice. While factors that actively promote positive intergroup interactions have been emerging, a central theoretical framework has not been formally proposed. To address this gap, we engaged a positive psychology lens to explore how researchers have defined key indicators and consider the positive counterparts of traditional prejudice-reduction models to begin building a new framework of egalitarianism. After scanning 16,840 records that emerged in PsycInfo using keywords "egalitarian", "non-prejudice", and "intergroup", we assessed 158 articles for eligibility. Among the relevant articles (N = 54), we analyzed authors' definitions, methods of measurement, types of processes, and outcomes associated with egalitarian values as they related to intergroup behavior. Overall, there was notable variability in how researchers conceptualized and studied egalitarianism. We discuss the five broad categories of egalitarianism (prejudice reduction, universal orientation, concern for others, positive expression, and low social dominance orientation) and how they relate to positive or negative and approach or avoidant outcomes. Through these findings, we urge scholars to utilize a centralized model for studying egalitarianism in intergroup contexts moving forward.

摘要

大量关于群体间关系的研究强调了导致偏见减少的态度、动机和情感。虽然积极促进积极群体间互动的因素不断涌现,但尚未正式提出一个核心理论框架。为了填补这一空白,我们运用积极心理学的视角来探讨研究人员如何定义关键指标,并考虑传统偏见减少模型的积极对应物,以开始构建一个新的平等主义框架。在使用关键词“平等主义”、“无偏见”和“群体间”在PsycInfo中搜索出的16,840条记录中,我们评估了158篇文章的适用性。在相关文章(N = 54)中,我们分析了作者对与群体间行为相关的平等主义价值观的定义、测量方法、过程类型和结果。总体而言,研究人员在如何概念化和研究平等主义方面存在显著差异。我们讨论了平等主义的五大类别(偏见减少、普遍取向、关心他人、积极表达和低社会支配取向)以及它们与积极或消极以及趋近或回避结果的关系。通过这些发现,我们敦促学者们在未来研究群体间背景下的平等主义时采用一个集中的模型。