Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing 100081, China.
Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing 100081, China.
Genes (Basel). 2024 Sep 18;15(9):1217. doi: 10.3390/genes15091217.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Glass, bone, and dentin are commonly applied substrates for osteoclast cultures; however, the impact of these substrates on osteoclastogenesis remains underexplored. This study aimed to address a significant gap in understanding how different substrates influence the process of osteoclastogenesis.
RAW 264.7 cells were cultured and induced with RANKL on glass, bone, and dentin slides. Histological and molecular techniques were used to identify patterns and differences in osteoclast behavior on each substrate.
Osteoclasts cultured on glass slides possessed the greatest number of nuclei and the highest expression levels of ACP5 (TRAP) and CTSK, with osteoclasts on bone and dentin slides displaying progressively lower levels. Src expression was also most pronounced in osteoclasts on glass slides, with decreased levels observed on bone and dentin. This variation in Src expression likely contributed to differences in cytoskeletal remodeling and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), resulting in substrate-dependent divergences in osteoclastogenesis.
Glass slides were the most favorable substrate for inducing osteoclastogenesis, while bone and dentin slides were less effective. The substrate-induced expression of Src played a fundamental role in shaping the phenotypic divergence of osteoclasts. These insights fill important knowledge gaps and have significant implications for the development and selection of in vitro models for bone-related diseases and drug screening platforms.
背景/目的:玻璃、骨和牙本质是常用于破骨细胞培养的底物;然而,这些底物对破骨细胞生成的影响仍未得到充分探索。本研究旨在解决一个重要的理解空白,即不同底物如何影响破骨细胞生成过程。
在玻璃、骨和牙本质载玻片上培养 RAW 264.7 细胞,并通过 RANKL 诱导。采用组织学和分子技术来识别在每种底物上破骨细胞行为的模式和差异。
在玻璃载玻片上培养的破骨细胞具有最多的细胞核和最高水平的 ACP5(TRAP)和 CTSK,而在骨和牙本质载玻片上培养的破骨细胞则显示出逐渐降低的水平。Src 的表达在玻璃载玻片上的破骨细胞中也最为明显,而在骨和牙本质载玻片上的表达水平降低。这种 Src 表达的变化可能导致细胞骨架重塑和氧化磷酸化(OXPHOS)的差异,从而导致破骨细胞生成的底物依赖性差异。
玻璃载片是诱导破骨细胞生成的最有利底物,而骨和牙本质载片则效果较差。Src 的底物诱导表达在塑造破骨细胞表型差异方面发挥了重要作用。这些见解填补了重要的知识空白,并对骨相关疾病的体外模型的开发和选择以及药物筛选平台具有重要意义。