Suppr超能文献

非保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗的持续时间:6个月与12个月对比

Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: 6 versus 12 Months.

作者信息

Hartikainen Tau Sarra, Mertins Sina, Behrens Max, Neumann Franz-Josef, Valina Christian Marc, Löffelhardt Nikolaus, Rahimi Nedjat Faridun Daniel, Breitbart Philipp, Franke Kilian, Westermann Dirk, Ferenc Miroslaw

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, 79189 Bad Krozingen, Germany.

Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 13;13(18):5449. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185449.

Abstract

: For patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of an unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) stenosis, the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of 6- versus 12-month DAPT duration in patients with PCI of an uLMCA and stable angina. : In this retrospective analysis, we included consecutive patients of our centre who underwent PCI of uLMCA stenosis for stable angina and who received DAPT with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel for either 6 or 12 months. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at one year. Secondary endpoints included individual components of the primary endpoint, definite/probable stent thrombosis, and bleeding. Clinical outcomes were assessed by unadjusted analysis and by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). : Out of 984 included patients, 339 (34.5%) received DAPT for 6 months and 645 (65.5%) for 12 months. The primary endpoint occurred in 51 patients (15.2%) in the 6-month group and in 104 (16.3%) in the 12-month group ( = 0.674). Incidences of stent thrombosis (0.9% versus 0.3%, = 0.224) and BARC 3,4,5 bleeding (6% versus 5.8%, = 0.808) were also comparable in both groups. We found no significant differences in the primary endpoint and its components or BARC 3,4,5 bleeding between 6 and 12 months. : Our findings do not support the extension of DAPT beyond 6 months after PCI for uLMCA in patients with stable angina.

摘要

对于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的无保护左主干冠状动脉(uLMCA)狭窄患者,双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的最佳持续时间仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较uLMCA合并稳定型心绞痛患者接受6个月与12个月DAPT治疗的临床结局。:在这项回顾性分析中,我们纳入了本中心连续接受uLMCA狭窄PCI治疗且因稳定型心绞痛接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷DAPT治疗6个月或12个月的患者。主要终点是1年时全因死亡、心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建的复合终点。次要终点包括主要终点的各个组成部分、明确/可能的支架血栓形成和出血。通过未调整分析和治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)评估临床结局。:在纳入的984例患者中,339例(34.5%)接受了6个月的DAPT治疗,645例(65.5%)接受了12个月的DAPT治疗。6个月组51例患者(15.2%)发生主要终点事件,12个月组104例患者(16.3%)发生主要终点事件(P = 0.674)。两组的支架血栓形成发生率(0.9%对0.3%,P = 0.224)和BARC 3、4、5级出血发生率(6%对5.8%,P = 0.808)也相当。我们发现6个月和12个月之间在主要终点及其组成部分或BARC 3、4、5级出血方面没有显著差异。:我们的研究结果不支持在稳定型心绞痛患者中,uLMCA PCI术后DAPT持续时间超过6个月。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbf0/11431983/3148423987de/jcm-13-05449-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验