Hartikainen Tau Sarra, Mertins Sina, Behrens Max, Neumann Franz-Josef, Valina Christian Marc, Löffelhardt Nikolaus, Rahimi Nedjat Faridun Daniel, Breitbart Philipp, Franke Kilian, Westermann Dirk, Ferenc Miroslaw
Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, 79189 Bad Krozingen, Germany.
Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 13;13(18):5449. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185449.
: For patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of an unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) stenosis, the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of 6- versus 12-month DAPT duration in patients with PCI of an uLMCA and stable angina. : In this retrospective analysis, we included consecutive patients of our centre who underwent PCI of uLMCA stenosis for stable angina and who received DAPT with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel for either 6 or 12 months. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at one year. Secondary endpoints included individual components of the primary endpoint, definite/probable stent thrombosis, and bleeding. Clinical outcomes were assessed by unadjusted analysis and by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). : Out of 984 included patients, 339 (34.5%) received DAPT for 6 months and 645 (65.5%) for 12 months. The primary endpoint occurred in 51 patients (15.2%) in the 6-month group and in 104 (16.3%) in the 12-month group ( = 0.674). Incidences of stent thrombosis (0.9% versus 0.3%, = 0.224) and BARC 3,4,5 bleeding (6% versus 5.8%, = 0.808) were also comparable in both groups. We found no significant differences in the primary endpoint and its components or BARC 3,4,5 bleeding between 6 and 12 months. : Our findings do not support the extension of DAPT beyond 6 months after PCI for uLMCA in patients with stable angina.
对于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的无保护左主干冠状动脉(uLMCA)狭窄患者,双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的最佳持续时间仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较uLMCA合并稳定型心绞痛患者接受6个月与12个月DAPT治疗的临床结局。:在这项回顾性分析中,我们纳入了本中心连续接受uLMCA狭窄PCI治疗且因稳定型心绞痛接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷DAPT治疗6个月或12个月的患者。主要终点是1年时全因死亡、心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建的复合终点。次要终点包括主要终点的各个组成部分、明确/可能的支架血栓形成和出血。通过未调整分析和治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)评估临床结局。:在纳入的984例患者中,339例(34.5%)接受了6个月的DAPT治疗,645例(65.5%)接受了12个月的DAPT治疗。6个月组51例患者(15.2%)发生主要终点事件,12个月组104例患者(16.3%)发生主要终点事件(P = 0.674)。两组的支架血栓形成发生率(0.9%对0.3%,P = 0.224)和BARC 3、4、5级出血发生率(6%对5.8%,P = 0.808)也相当。我们发现6个月和12个月之间在主要终点及其组成部分或BARC 3、4、5级出血方面没有显著差异。:我们的研究结果不支持在稳定型心绞痛患者中,uLMCA PCI术后DAPT持续时间超过6个月。