Punzo Giovanni, Beccia Giovanna, Cambise Chiara, Iacobucci Tiziana, Sessa Flaminio, Sgreccia Mauro, Sacco Teresa, Leone Angela, Congedo Maria Teresa, Meacci Elisa, Margaritora Stefano, Sollazzi Liliana, Aceto Paola
Department of Emergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 20;13(18):5589. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185589.
: Intraoperative fluid management based on pulse pressure variation has shown potential to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and improve clinical outcomes in various surgical settings. However, its efficacy and safety have not been assessed in patients undergoing thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation. : Patients scheduled for pulmonary lobectomy using uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery approach were randomly assigned to two groups. In the PPV group, fluid administration was guided by the pulse pressure variation parameter, while in the near-zero group, it was guided by conventional hemodynamic parameters. The primary outcome was the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO)/ fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) ratio 15 min after extubation. The secondary outcomes included extubation time, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the first three postoperative days, and the length of hospital stay. : The PaO/FiO ratio did not differ between the two groups (364.48 ± 38.06 vs. 359.21 ± 36.95; = 0.51), although patients in the PPV group ( = 44) received a larger amount of both crystalloids (1145 ± 470.21 vs. 890 ± 459.31, = 0.01) and colloids (162.5 ± 278.31 vs 18.18 ± 94.68, = 0.002) compared to the near-zero group ( = 44). No differences were found in extubation time, type and number of PPCs, and length of hospital stay. : PPV-guided fluid management in thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation does not improve pulmonary gas exchange as measured by the PaO/FiO ratio and does not seem to offer clinical benefits. Additionally, it results in increased fluid administration compared to fluid management based on conventional hemodynamic parameters.
基于脉压变异的术中液体管理已显示出在各种手术环境中减少术后肺部并发症(PPCs)并改善临床结局的潜力。然而,其在单肺通气的胸外科手术患者中的疗效和安全性尚未得到评估。
计划采用单孔电视辅助胸外科手术方法进行肺叶切除术的患者被随机分为两组。在脉压变异(PPV)组中,液体输注由脉压变异参数指导,而在接近零组中,由传统血流动力学参数指导。主要结局是拔管后15分钟的氧分压(PaO)/吸入氧分数(FiO)比值。次要结局包括拔管时间、术后前三天的术后肺部并发症发生率以及住院时间。
两组之间的PaO/FiO比值没有差异(364.48±38.06 vs. 359.21±36.95;P = 0.51),尽管与接近零组(n = 44)相比,PPV组(n = 44)的晶体液(1145±470.21 vs. 890±459.31,P = 0.01)和胶体液(162.5±278.31 vs 18.18±94.68,P = 0.002)输注量更大。在拔管时间、PPCs的类型和数量以及住院时间方面未发现差异。
在需要单肺通气的胸外科手术中,基于PPV的液体管理并不能改善以PaO/FiO比值衡量的肺气体交换,似乎也没有临床益处。此外,与基于传统血流动力学参数的液体管理相比,它会导致液体输注量增加。