Suppr超能文献

非心脏手术期间通过动态前负荷指标评估容量反应性的潮气量挑战:一项前瞻性研究

Tidal Volume Challenge to Assess Volume Responsiveness with Dynamic Preload Indices During Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Study.

作者信息

Griva Panagiota, Kapetanakis Emmanouil I, Milionis Orestis, Panagouli Konstantina, Fountoulaki Maria, Sidiropoulou Tatiana

机构信息

Second Department of Anesthesiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12461 Athens, Greece.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12461 Athens, Greece.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 27;14(1):101. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010101.

Abstract

: The aim of this study is to assess whether changes in Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) and Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) following a VtC can predict the response to fluid administration in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia with protective mechanical ventilation. : A total of 40 patients undergoing general surgery or vascular surgery without clamping the aorta were enrolled. Protective mechanical ventilation was applied, and the radial artery was catheterized in all patients. The protocol began one hour after the induction of general anesthesia and the stabilization of hemodynamic parameters. The parameters PPV and SVV were recorded during ventilation with a Vt of 6 mL/kg Ideal Body Weight (IBW) (T1). Then, the Vt was increased to 8 mL/kg IBW for 3 min without changing other respiratory parameters. After the VtC, the parameters PPV and SVV (T2) were recorded. After the stabilization of hemodynamic parameters, volume expansion (VE) was administered with colloid fluid of 6 mL/kg IBW. Parameters before (T3) and 5 min after fluid challenge (T4) were recorded. The change in the Stroke Volume Index (SVI) before and after VE was used to indicate fluid responsiveness. Patients were classified as fluid responders (SVI ≥ 10%) or non-responders (SVI < 10%). : The parameter ΔPPV(6-8) demonstrated good predictive ability to predict fluid responsiveness, evidenced by an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.86 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.74 to 0.95, < 0.0001]. The threshold of ΔPPV(6-8) exceeding 2% identified responders with a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI 0.45 to 1.0, < 0.0001) and a specificity of 73% (95% CI 0.48 to 1.0, < 0.0001). The parameter ΔSVV(6-8) also revealed good predictive ability, reflected by an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.94, < 0.0001). The criterion ΔSVV(6-8) greater than 2% pinpointed responders with a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI 0.71 to 1.0, < 0.001) and a specificity of 77% (95% CI 0.44 to 1.0, < 0.001). : This study demonstrates that VtC possesses good predictive ability for fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing general surgery.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估在接受全身麻醉并采用保护性机械通气的手术患者中,肺活量变化(VtC)后脉压变异(PPV)和每搏量变异(SVV)的变化是否能够预测对液体输注的反应。

共纳入40例接受普通外科手术或血管手术且未夹闭主动脉的患者。采用保护性机械通气,所有患者均行桡动脉置管。方案在全身麻醉诱导及血流动力学参数稳定1小时后开始。在潮气量(Vt)为6 mL/kg理想体重(IBW)通气期间记录PPV和SVV参数(T1)。然后,在不改变其他呼吸参数的情况下,将Vt增加至8 mL/kg IBW持续3分钟。VtC后,记录PPV和SVV参数(T2)。血流动力学参数稳定后,以6 mL/kg IBW的胶体液进行容量扩充(VE)。记录液体冲击前(T3)和冲击后5分钟(T4)的参数。用VE前后每搏量指数(SVI)的变化来表示液体反应性。患者被分为液体反应者(SVI≥10%)或无反应者(SVI<10%)。

参数ΔPPV(6 - 8)在预测液体反应性方面显示出良好的预测能力,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.86[95%置信区间(CI)0.74至0.95,P<0.0001]证明了这一点。ΔPPV(6 - 8)超过2%的阈值识别反应者的灵敏度为83%(95%CI 0.45至1.0,P<0.0001),特异性为73%(95%CI 0.48至1.0,P<0.0001)。参数ΔSVV(6 - 8)也显示出良好的预测能力,AUC为0.82(95%CI 0.67至0.94,P<0.0001)反映了这一点。ΔSVV(6 - 8)大于2%的标准识别反应者的灵敏度为83%(95%CI 0.71至1.0,P<0.001),特异性为77%(95%CI 0.44至1.0,P<0.001)。

本研究表明,VtC对接受普通外科手术患者的液体反应性具有良好的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/667b/11721188/ce6120b3d945/jcm-14-00101-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验