College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep 23;25(18):10211. doi: 10.3390/ijms251810211.
Although decades of intensive drug discovery efforts to treat neurodegenerative disorders (NDs) have failed, around half a million patients in more than 2000 studies continue being tested, costing over USD 100 billion, despite the conclusion that even those drugs which have been approved have no better effect than a placebo. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has established multiple programs to innovate the treatment of rare diseases, particularly NDs, providing millions of USD in funding primarily by encouraging novel clinical trials to account for issues related to study sizes and adopting multi-arm studies to account for patient dropouts. Instead, the FDA should focus on the primary reason for failure: the poor bioavailability of drugs reaching the brain (generally 0.1% at most) due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). There are several solutions to enhance entry into the brain, and the FDA must require proof of significant entry into the brain as the prerequisite to approving Investigational New Drug (IND) applications. The FDA should also rely on factors other than biomarkers to confirm efficacy, as these are rarely relevant to clinical use. This study summarizes how the drugs used to treat NDs can be made effective and how the FDA should change its guidelines for IND approval of these drugs.
尽管数十年来,人们一直致力于寻找治疗神经退行性疾病(NDs)的药物,但仍有超过 2000 项研究继续对大约 50 万名患者进行测试,耗费超过 1000 亿美元,尽管结论表明,即使已被批准的药物也不比安慰剂有效。美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)已建立多个项目来创新治疗罕见疾病,特别是 NDs 的方法,提供了数百万美元的资金,主要是通过鼓励新型临床试验来解决与研究规模相关的问题,并采用多臂研究来解决患者流失问题。相反,FDA 应该专注于失败的主要原因:由于血脑屏障(BBB)的存在,药物到达大脑的生物利用度很差(通常最多为 0.1%)。有几种方法可以增强药物进入大脑的能力,而 FDA 必须要求证明药物有明显进入大脑,作为批准新药临床试验(IND)申请的前提条件。FDA 还应该依赖于除生物标志物以外的因素来确认疗效,因为这些标志物很少与临床使用相关。本研究总结了如何使治疗 NDs 的药物有效,并介绍了 FDA 应如何改变其 IND 批准这些药物的指南。