Lovrec Darko, Tič Vito
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Polymers (Basel). 2024 Sep 10;16(18):2551. doi: 10.3390/polym16182551.
The compatibility of seal materials with the working fluid is crucial for the flawless, energy-saving, environmentally sustainable, and safe operation of any technical system. This is especially true for hydraulic systems operating under high operating pressure. The problem of materials compatibility comes into play when either a new type of seal material or a new type of fluid comes into use. The paper discusses the research findings regarding material compatibility testing of new high-tech ionic hydraulic fluids with commonly used seal materials. Due to the completely different chemical composition of these new fluids compared to the classical mineral-based oil, for these fluids, there are no standardized testing procedures. In these cases, we can only lean on the Standards that apply to classical fluids, which can lead to incorrect results. In the forefront of the paper is the discrepancy between the results obtained by the standardized test, and the test under real operating conditions. FKM, an excellent material for seals, proved to be the most suitable in the case of using ionic hydraulic fluid, according to a standardized test. However, it failed in the comparison test under real operating conditions, as the cylinder leaked. NBR seals proved to be a better solution.
密封材料与工作流体的兼容性对于任何技术系统的完美、节能、环境可持续和安全运行至关重要。对于在高工作压力下运行的液压系统而言尤其如此。当使用新型密封材料或新型流体时,材料兼容性问题就会出现。本文讨论了关于新型高科技离子液压流体与常用密封材料的材料兼容性测试的研究结果。由于这些新型流体与传统矿物基油的化学成分完全不同,对于这些流体,没有标准化的测试程序。在这些情况下,我们只能依靠适用于传统流体的标准,这可能会导致错误的结果。本文最突出的是标准化测试结果与实际运行条件下的测试结果之间的差异。根据标准化测试,FKM作为一种出色的密封材料,在使用离子液压流体的情况下被证明是最合适的。然而,在实际运行条件下的对比测试中它失败了,因为气缸发生了泄漏。事实证明,丁腈橡胶(NBR)密封件是更好的解决方案。