Suppr超能文献

通过各种手术打结技术实现的结扎点比较强度:一项使用Maxon™单丝缝线的观察性研究

Comparative strength of ligature points achieved by various surgical knot-tying techniques: an observational study using Maxon™ monofilament sutures.

作者信息

Tsuzaka Shoichi, Konishi Yuji, Mino Kazuhiro, Honma Naotake, Kawamura Hideki, Yoshida Takuto, Taketomi Akinobu

机构信息

Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center, 1-1, 5-7, Yamanote, Nishi-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 063-0005, Japan.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center, 1-1, 5-7, Yamanote, Nishi-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 063-0005, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2025 Apr;55(4):600-605. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02936-5. Epub 2024 Sep 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Surgical knot-tying requires careful selection of the appropriate technique for optimal outcomes; however, evidence is lacking about the common ligation techniques combining square and slip knots (combination knots). This study investigates the strength of a combination knot, compared with other techniques.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, we assessed the strengths of square, slip-granny, slip-reef, and combination knots using absorbable monofilament sutures, and compared them using ANOVA and a multilevel linear regression analysis. We also assessed the correlation between the number of throws and knot strength using Spearman's correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Among 80 ligatures, ANOVA indicated significant differences in knot strength among the techniques (p < 0.01). Multilevel linear regression showed that a combination knot was stronger than a slip knot (p < 0.01) and comparable to a square knot (p = 0.0721). Secondary analysis indicated that for combination knots, five throws could achieve sufficient knot strength.

CONCLUSION

Combination knots are as strong as square knots and stronger than slip knots, and thus present a reasonable option for surgical ligation.

摘要

目的

手术打结需要仔细选择合适的技术以获得最佳效果;然而,关于方形结和滑结结合的常见结扎技术(组合结)的证据却很缺乏。本研究将组合结与其他技术相比较,探究其强度。

方法

在这项观察性队列研究中,我们使用可吸收单丝缝线评估方形结、滑奶奶结、滑双钱结和组合结的强度,并通过方差分析和多级线性回归分析进行比较。我们还使用斯皮尔曼相关性分析评估打结次数与结强度之间的相关性。

结果

在80个结扎中,方差分析表明各技术之间的结强度存在显著差异(p < 0.01)。多级线性回归显示,组合结比滑结更强(p < 0.01),与方形结相当(p = 0.0721)。二次分析表明,对于组合结,打五次结可获得足够的结强度。

结论

组合结与方形结强度相当且比滑结更强,因此是手术结扎的合理选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验