School of Nursing, Beihua University, 3999 Binjiang East Road, Jilin, 132013, China.
School of Nursing, Jilin University, 965 Xinjiang Street, Changchun, Jilin , 130021, China.
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 28;24(1):793. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05377-4.
This systematic review examined studies that assessed the relationship between mortality risk and multidimensional frailty. The pooled risk of mortality was estimated via a meta-analysis.
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
A systematic search for potentially eligible literature was conducted on January 2, 2023, using five electronic databases: Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase. This review included cohort or longitudinal studies examining the association between multidimensional frailty/prefrailty and mortality in older adults. The quality of the included studies was evaluated via the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Two independent researchers identified eligible studies and extracted the data. The data analyses were performed via STATA, version 15.0.
A total of 24 studies with 34,664 participants were included. The 24 studies were published between 2012 and 2022, with most studies being performed in Italy (n = 16). The sample sizes of the included studies ranged from 71 to 12,020. Most included studies were conducted in hospital settings. The QUIPS bias assessment results showed that the most frequent source of potential bias was study confounding. The meta-analysis results showed that multidimensional frailty was a significant predictor of mortality (HR = 5.48, 95% CI = 3.91-7.67, p < 0.001). In addition, multidimensional prefrailty was also a significant predictor of mortality (HR = 2.56, 95% CI = 2.17-3.02, p < 0.001). The results of the meta-analysis using the ORs revealed that multidimensional frailty was a risk factor for mortality in older people (OR = 4.59, 95% CI = 2.47-8.55, p < 0.05).
This systematic review of the relationship between multidimensional frailty and mortality found that multidimensional frailty/prefrailty is a predictor of mortality. More studies should be conducted in community dwelling populations and nursing homes.
本系统评价研究了评估死亡率风险与多维虚弱之间关系的研究。通过荟萃分析估计死亡率的 pooled 风险。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
于 2023 年 1 月 2 日,通过五个电子数据库:Web of Science、CINAHL、PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 Embase,进行了潜在合格文献的系统搜索。本综述纳入了队列或纵向研究,评估了老年人多维虚弱/亚健与死亡率之间的关联。使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具评估纳入研究的质量。两名独立研究人员确定了合格的研究并提取了数据。使用 STATA 版本 15.0 进行数据分析。
共纳入 24 项研究,共计 34664 名参与者。24 项研究发表于 2012 年至 2022 年期间,其中大多数研究(n=16)在意大利进行。纳入研究的样本量范围为 71 至 12020。大多数纳入研究在医院环境中进行。QUIPS 偏倚评估结果显示,最常见的潜在偏倚来源是研究混杂。荟萃分析结果表明,多维虚弱是死亡率的一个显著预测因子(HR=5.48,95%CI=3.91-7.67,p<0.001)。此外,多维亚健也是死亡率的一个显著预测因子(HR=2.56,95%CI=2.17-3.02,p<0.001)。使用 ORs 进行的荟萃分析结果表明,多维虚弱是老年人死亡的一个危险因素(OR=4.59,95%CI=2.47-8.55,p<0.05)。
本系统评价多维虚弱与死亡率之间的关系发现,多维虚弱/亚健是死亡率的一个预测因子。应该在社区居住人群和养老院中进行更多的研究。