• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰全科医疗中“新冠后综合征”患者的护理需求:患者和全科医生的访谈研究。

Care needs of patients with the post-COVID syndrome in Dutch general practice: an interview study among patients and general practitioners.

机构信息

Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Otterstraat 118, Utrecht, 3513CR, The Netherlands.

Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2024 Sep 28;25(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02597-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-024-02597-w
PMID:39342189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11439229/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The post-COVID syndrome (PCS) has a large impact on an individual's daily life. The wide variety of symptoms in PCS patients and the fact that it is still relatively new makes it difficult for general practitioners (GPs) to recognize, diagnose and treat patients with PCS, leading to difficulties in assessing and fulfilling healthcare needs. It is largely unknown what the experiences of Dutch patients and GPs are with PCS and, therefore, we gained insight into the different aspects of living with PCS and the associated healthcare needs.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were performed with 13 self-reported PCS patients (varying in sex, age, education, and health literacy) and 6 GPs (varying in gender, age, and type of practice) between January-July 2022. Patients and GPs were most likely unrelated (not in the same practices). The data have been analysed using the Thematic Analysis method.

RESULTS

Experiences appeared to vary between two types of PCS patients that emerged during the interviews: (1) individuals with good pre-existing health status (PEHS) who are severely affected by PCS and have difficulty recovering and (2) individuals with poorer PEHS whose health became even poorer after COVID-19 infection. The interviews with PCS patients and GPs revealed two main themes, in which the types of patients differed: (1) aspects of living with PCS; individuals with good PEHS mainly experience symptoms when overstimulated, while individuals with poorer PEHS generally feel exhausted continuously. (2) Healthcare experiences; GPs emphasized that individuals with good PEHS seem to benefit from support in distributing their energy by careful planning of daily activities, whereas individuals with poorer PEHS require support in activation. Patients and GPs emphasised the importance of taking patients seriously and acknowledging their symptoms. Finally, the patients interviewed indicated that some GPs doubted the existence of PCS, resulting in insufficient recognition.

CONCLUSION

Awareness of the differences in needs and experiences of the two types of PCS patients could contribute to more appropriate care. Acknowledgement of PCS by GPs as a real syndrome is important for patients and plays an important role in coping with or recovering from PCS. A multidisciplinary person-centred approach is important and can be coordinated by a GP.

摘要

背景

新冠后综合征(PCS)对个体的日常生活有很大影响。PCS 患者症状多样,且该病相对较新,这使得全科医生(GP)难以识别、诊断和治疗 PCS 患者,导致难以评估和满足其医疗保健需求。目前尚不清楚荷兰患者和 GP 对 PCS 的体验如何,因此,我们深入了解了与 PCS 相关的生活的不同方面及其相关的医疗保健需求。

方法

2022 年 1 月至 7 月期间,对 13 名自我报告的 PCS 患者(性别、年龄、教育程度和健康素养各不相同)和 6 名 GP(性别、年龄和执业类型各不相同)进行了半结构化访谈。患者和 GP 很可能没有关系(不在同一家诊所)。使用主题分析方法对数据进行了分析。

结果

访谈中出现了两种类型的 PCS 患者,他们的体验似乎有所不同:(1) 先前健康状况良好(PEHS)的个体受 PCS 严重影响,难以康复;(2)PEHS 较差的个体在 COVID-19 感染后健康状况甚至更差。对 PCS 患者和 GP 的访谈揭示了两个主要主题,其中患者类型有所不同:(1)PCS 患者的生活方面;PEHS 较好的个体主要在过度刺激时出现症状,而 PEHS 较差的个体则普遍持续感到疲惫。(2)医疗保健体验;GP 强调,PEHS 较好的个体似乎通过仔细规划日常活动来分配精力,从而从支持中受益,而 PEHS 较差的个体则需要在激活方面的支持。患者和 GP 强调了认真对待患者并承认其症状的重要性。最后,接受访谈的患者表示,一些 GP 怀疑 PCS 的存在,导致对其认识不足。

结论

认识到两种类型的 PCS 患者的需求和体验差异,可以为提供更合适的护理做出贡献。GP 承认 PCS 是一种真正的综合征,对患者很重要,并在应对或从 PCS 中恢复方面发挥重要作用。多学科以患者为中心的方法很重要,可以由 GP 协调。

相似文献

1
Care needs of patients with the post-COVID syndrome in Dutch general practice: an interview study among patients and general practitioners.荷兰全科医疗中“新冠后综合征”患者的护理需求:患者和全科医生的访谈研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Sep 28;25(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02597-w.
2
Exploring the Experiences of Living With the Post-COVID Syndrome: A Qualitative Study.探索与新冠后综合征共存的体验:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14108. doi: 10.1111/hex.14108.
3
Enhancing long COVID care in general practice: A qualitative study.改善全科医学中长新冠的护理:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 26;19(6):e0306077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306077. eCollection 2024.
4
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
5
Exploring the perceptions and experiences of community rehabilitation for Long COVID from the perspectives of Scottish general practitioners' and people living with Long COVID: a qualitative study.从苏格兰全科医生和长期新冠患者的角度探讨对长期新冠社区康复的看法和体验:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e082830. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082830.
6
General practitioner trainees' career perspectives after COVID-19: a qualitative study in China.新冠疫情后全科住院医师培训学员的职业展望:中国的一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01364-x.
7
What can we learn from experiences in general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic? A qualitative study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我们能从全科医学实践中吸取哪些经验?一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 27;23(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09654-7.
8
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the core functions of primary care: will the cure be worse than the disease? A qualitative interview study in Flemish GPs.COVID-19 大流行对初级保健核心功能的影响:治疗会比疾病更糟糕吗? Flemish 家庭医生的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 17;10(6):e039674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039674.
9
The COVID-19 pandemic: A tipping point for advance care planning? Experiences of general practitioners.COVID-19 大流行:预先医疗照护计划的转折点?全科医生的经验。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jul;35(7):1238-1248. doi: 10.1177/02692163211016979. Epub 2021 May 27.
10
Behavioural determinants shaping infection prevention and control behaviour among healthcare workers in Dutch general practices: a qualitative study reflecting on pre-, during and post-COVID-19 pandemic.荷兰普通实践中医疗工作者的感染预防和控制行为的行为决定因素:对 COVID-19 大流行前后的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Feb 28;25(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02304-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Experience from a Pilot Study Implementing Software-Based Post-COVID Case Management in GP Practices-A Qualitative Process Evaluation.在全科医疗实践中实施基于软件的新冠后病例管理的试点研究中的患者体验——一项定性过程评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;13(14):1701. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141701.
2
Patient Perspectives on the Care in a Long COVID Outpatient Clinic-A Regional Qualitative Analysis from Germany.长新冠门诊患者对护理的看法——来自德国的区域定性分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 3;13(7):818. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070818.

本文引用的文献

1
Nivel Corona Cohort: A description of the cohort and methodology used for combining general practice electronic records with patient reported outcomes to study impact of a COVID-19 infection.Nivel Corona 队列:用于将一般实践电子记录与患者报告结果相结合来研究 COVID-19 感染影响的队列和方法学的描述。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 22;18(8):e0288715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288715. eCollection 2023.
2
Identifying diseases associated with Post-COVID syndrome through an integrated network biology approach.通过综合网络生物学方法识别与新冠后综合征相关的疾病。
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2024 Jan-Feb;42(2):652-671. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2023.2195003. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
3
Negotiation of collective and individual candidacy for long Covid healthcare in the early phases of the Covid-19 pandemic: Validated, diverted and rejected candidacy.
在新冠疫情早期阶段,关于长期新冠医疗保健的集体和个人候选资格的协商:经过验证、转向和被拒绝的候选资格。
SSM Qual Res Health. 2023 Jun;3:100207. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100207. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
4
Post-acute sequelae of covid-19 six to 12 months after infection: population based study.新冠感染后 6 至 12 个月的急性后期后遗症:基于人群的研究。
BMJ. 2022 Oct 13;379:e071050. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071050.
5
Long covid and medical gaslighting: Dismissal, delayed diagnosis, and deferred treatment.长期新冠与医疗误诊:忽视、延迟诊断和延误治疗。
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2:100167. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100167. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
6
Enhancing the management of long COVID in general practice: a scoping review.加强全科医疗中长新冠的管理:一项范围综述
BJGP Open. 2022 Sep 28;6(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0178. Print 2022 Sep.
7
Social Stigma of Patients Suffering from COVID-19: Challenges for Health Care System.新冠肺炎患者的社会污名化:医疗保健系统面临的挑战
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 2;10(2):292. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020292.
8
Experiences of living with long COVID and of accessing healthcare services: a qualitative systematic review.长新冠患者的生活体验和医疗服务获取情况:一项定性系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):e050979. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050979.
9
A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus.德尔菲共识对新冠后状况的临床病例定义。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;22(4):e102-e107. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00703-9. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
10
More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 的 50 多种长期影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 9;11(1):16144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95565-8.