Suppr超能文献

干预措施对终末期慢性疾病患者非正式照护者的效果:系统评价。

Effectiveness of interventions for informal caregivers of people with end-stage chronic illness: a systematic review.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK.

Western Health and Social Care Trust, Londonderry, UK.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 28;13(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02641-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

People living with advanced, non-malignant chronic conditions often have extensive and complex care needs. Informal or family caregivers often provide the care and support needed by those with advanced chronic conditions at home. These informal caregivers experience many challenges associated with their caring role, which can impact their own wellbeing. Whilst there is growing evidence around the impact on carers, guidance on support for informal caregivers of patients with advanced, non-malignant, chronic conditions is lacking, with little evidence available on effective psychosocial carer interventions. This systematic review explored existing interventions for caregivers of those with advanced, non-malignant, chronic illness, in order to assess the effectiveness of these interventions in improving psychosocial outcomes.

METHODS

Electronic databases, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, were searched up to the end of March 2023. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria, focusing on interventions to improve psychosocial outcomes, such as depression, anxiety, quality of life, and caregiver burden, in this cohort of caregivers were included. Data were extracted regarding study setting, design, methods, intervention components, and outcomes. Risk of bias and quality assessment were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 5281 articles were screened, ultimately identifying 12 studies for inclusion, reported in 13 publications. A narrative synthesis revealed mixed results. Psychosocial interventions resulted in more significant improvements in psychosocial outcomes than psychoeducational or support interventions, with interventions for carer-patient dyads also reflecting more positive outcomes for caregivers. Evidence-based interventions, guided by an appropriate theoretical model, were reportedly more effective in improving caregiver outcomes. Differences in outcomes were related to intervention development, design, delivery, and outcome assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

This review, to our knowledge, is the first to explore the effectiveness of interventions in improving psychosocial outcomes for caregivers of those with advanced, non-malignant, chronic conditions. The review highlights the need for more robust, sufficiently powered, high-quality trials of evidence-based interventions for caregivers of people with advanced chronic illness. Optimal intervention duration and frequency of sessions are unclear and need further exploration.

摘要

背景

患有晚期非恶性慢性疾病的人通常有广泛而复杂的护理需求。非专业或家庭护理人员通常在家中为患有晚期慢性疾病的人提供所需的护理和支持。这些非专业护理人员在履行护理职责时会遇到许多挑战,这可能会影响他们自己的幸福感。虽然越来越多的证据表明护理人员受到影响,但缺乏针对晚期非恶性慢性疾病患者的非专业护理人员的支持指导,关于有效的心理社会护理人员干预措施的证据也很少。本系统评价旨在探讨针对晚期非恶性慢性疾病患者护理人员的现有干预措施,以评估这些干预措施在改善心理社会结局方面的有效性。

方法

截至 2023 年 3 月底,我们对电子数据库(包括 Medline、CINAHL、EMBASE 和 PsycINFO)进行了检索。纳入了符合纳入标准的研究,这些研究侧重于改善心理社会结局(如抑郁、焦虑、生活质量和护理人员负担)的干预措施。研究数据提取内容包括研究地点、设计、方法、干预措施组成部分和结局。我们还进行了偏倚风险和质量评估。

结果

共筛选出 5281 篇文章,最终确定了 12 项研究纳入本评价,在 13 篇出版物中有相关报道。叙事性综合分析结果显示干预措施的效果不一。与心理教育或支持性干预相比,心理社会干预措施在心理社会结局方面的改善更为显著,护理人员-患者二人组的干预措施也反映出护理人员的结局更为积极。据报道,基于适当理论模型的循证干预措施在改善护理人员结局方面更为有效。结局的差异与干预措施的开发、设计、实施和结局评估有关。

结论

据我们所知,本评价是首次探讨针对晚期非恶性慢性疾病患者的护理人员的干预措施在改善其心理社会结局方面的有效性。本评价强调需要进一步开展更有力、更有影响力、高质量的针对晚期慢性疾病患者的护理人员的循证干预措施试验。干预措施的最佳持续时间和治疗频率尚不清楚,需要进一步探索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ede0/11438131/e8d53a23f6f7/13643_2024_2641_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验