• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Twenty Years of Legal Marriage for Same-Sex Couples in the United States: Evidence Review and New Analyse.美国同性伴侣合法婚姻二十年:证据回顾与新分析
Rand Health Q. 2024 Sep 25;11(4):1. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Gay marriage, same-sex parenting, and America's children.同性婚姻、同性养育与美国儿童
Future Child. 2005 Fall;15(2):97-115. doi: 10.1353/foc.2005.0018.
3
Committee Opinion No. 574: Marriage equality for same-sex couples.委员会意见 No.574:同性伴侣婚姻平等。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;122(3):729-32. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000433995.46087.cc.
4
The Significance of Living Together and Importance of Marriage in Same-Sex Couples.同性伴侣共同生活的意义及婚姻的重要性。
J Homosex. 2015;62(9):1241-63. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1037137. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
5
America's changing attitudes toward homosexuality, civil unions, and same-gender marriage: 1977-2004.1977 - 2004年美国对同性恋、民事结合及同性婚姻态度的转变
Soc Work. 2007 Jan;52(1):71-9. doi: 10.1093/sw/52.1.71.
6
Potential differences between the political attitudes of people with same-sex parents and people with different-sex parents: An exploratory assessment of first-year college students.有同性父母与有异性父母的人群的政治态度差异:对一年级大学生的探索性评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0246929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246929. eCollection 2021.
7
Cohabitation and Marriage Among Same-Sex Couples in the 2019 ACS and CPS: A Research Note.2019 年 ACS 和 CPS 中同性伴侣的同居和婚姻:研究注释。
Demography. 2022 Oct 1;59(5):1595-1605. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10181474.
8
Same-Sex Marriage and the Assimilationist Dilemma: A Research Agenda on Marriage Equality and the Future of LGBTQ Activism, Politics, Communities, and Identities.同性婚姻与同化困境:关于婚姻平等以及 LGBTQ 维权、政治、社群和身份认同未来的研究议程
J Homosex. 2018;65(14):1941-1956. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1423211. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
9
Cultural change in acceptance of LGBT people: lessons from social marketing.对LGBT群体接纳度的文化变革:来自社会营销的经验教训。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2014;84(1):19-22. doi: 10.1037/h0098945.
10
The death of marriage? The effects of new forms of legal recognition on marriage rates in the United States.婚姻的消亡?新形式的法律认可对美国结婚率的影响。
Demography. 2014 Apr;51(2):563-85. doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-0277-2.

美国同性伴侣合法婚姻二十年:证据回顾与新分析

Twenty Years of Legal Marriage for Same-Sex Couples in the United States: Evidence Review and New Analyse.

作者信息

Karney Benjamin R, Zaber Melanie A, Smith Molly G, Mann Samuel J, AlFakhri Marwa, Coe Jessie, Ryan Jamie L, Gadwah-Meaden Catria, Mallory Christy, Sears Brad, Garber Chandra

出版信息

Rand Health Q. 2024 Sep 25;11(4):1. eCollection 2024 Sep.

PMID:39346110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11425929/
Abstract

Twenty years ago, the United States was divided by heated debates over legalizing marriage for same-sex couples. Those in favor argued that granting same-sex couples access to marriage would strengthen commitment for same-sex couples, extend the financial benefits of marriage to same-sex households, and improve outcomes for children raised by same-sex parents. Those who were opposed argued that granting legal status to marriages between same-sex partners would alter the foundation of marriage and diminish its value for different-sex couples, ultimately harming children by making them less likely to be raised in stable, two-parent families. It has now been 20 years since Massachusetts became the first state to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples in May 2004. The consequences of extending legal recognition to same-sex couples need no longer be a topic of speculation and debate; researchers have had two decades to study the consequences of legalizing marriage for same-sex couples on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals; their children; and the general public. The broad goal of this study is to document those consequences. The authors pursued this goal in two ways. First, they conducted a comprehensive review of the existing research literature on the effects of legalizing marriage for same-sex couples. Second, they conducted new analyses to evaluate the prediction that rates of marriage, cohabitation, and divorce and attitudes toward marriage would be adversely affected by granting same-sex couples access to legal marriage.

摘要

二十年前,美国因同性伴侣婚姻合法化问题展开了激烈辩论,国家因此产生了分歧。支持者认为,赋予同性伴侣婚姻权利将加强同性伴侣之间的承诺,将婚姻的经济利益扩展到同性家庭,并改善由同性父母抚养的孩子的成长结果。反对者则认为,赋予同性伴侣间婚姻的法律地位会改变婚姻的基础,降低其对异性伴侣的价值,最终使孩子不太可能在稳定的双亲家庭中成长,从而伤害到孩子。自2004年5月马萨诸塞州成为首个向同性伴侣颁发结婚证的州以来,已经过去了20年。给予同性伴侣法律认可的后果已不再是一个猜测和辩论的话题;研究人员有二十年的时间来研究同性伴侣婚姻合法化对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别(LGBT)群体、他们的子女以及普通公众的影响。这项研究的总体目标是记录这些后果。作者通过两种方式来实现这一目标。首先,他们对现有的关于同性伴侣婚姻合法化影响的研究文献进行了全面综述。其次,他们进行了新的分析,以评估同性伴侣获得合法婚姻会对结婚率、同居率、离婚率以及对婚姻的态度产生不利影响这一预测。