Suppr超能文献

牙周敷料的生物相容性评估:一项研究。

Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of Periodontal Dressings: An Study.

作者信息

Akhter Fatema

机构信息

Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2500-S2502. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_335_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periodontal dressings play a crucial role in post-operative management of periodontal surgeries by protecting surgical sites and promoting wound healing. Biocompatibility evaluation is essential to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these materials. This study aims to assess the biocompatibility of periodontal dressings through an approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, three commercially available periodontal dressings were evaluated for their biocompatibility. The Dressings were Dressing A: Coe-Pak Dressing B: Barricaid and Dressing C: PeriAcryl. Human gingival fibroblast cells were cultured and exposed to extracts of the dressings using the MTT assay to assess cell viability. Additionally, cell morphology and attachment were observed under a microscope. The experiment was conducted in triplicate for each dressing.

RESULTS

The MTT assay revealed that Dressing A exhibited the highest cell viability with an absorbance value of 0.8 ± 0.1, followed by Dressing B with a value of 0.6 ± 0.2 and Dressing C with a value of 0.5 ± 0.1. Microscopic analysis showed normal cell morphology and attachment in cells exposed to Dressing A and Dressing B extracts, while cells exposed to Dressing C exhibited slight detachment and irregular morphology.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that Dressing A and Dressing B demonstrate favorable biocompatibility profiles, as evidenced by higher cell viability and normal cell morphology.

摘要

背景

牙周敷料在牙周手术的术后管理中起着关键作用,可保护手术部位并促进伤口愈合。生物相容性评估对于确保这些材料的安全性和有效性至关重要。本研究旨在通过一种方法评估牙周敷料的生物相容性。

材料与方法

在本研究中,对三种市售牙周敷料的生物相容性进行了评估。这些敷料分别为:敷料A:Coe-Pak;敷料B:Barricaid;敷料C:PeriAcryl。培养人牙龈成纤维细胞,并使用MTT法将其暴露于敷料提取物中以评估细胞活力。此外,在显微镜下观察细胞形态和附着情况。每种敷料的实验均重复进行三次。

结果

MTT法显示,敷料A的细胞活力最高,吸光度值为0.8±0.1,其次是敷料B,值为0.6±0.2,敷料C的值为0.5±0.1。显微镜分析表明,暴露于敷料A和敷料B提取物的细胞形态和附着正常,而暴露于敷料C的细胞表现出轻微 detachment 和不规则形态。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,敷料A和敷料B表现出良好的生物相容性,细胞活力较高和细胞形态正常证明了这一点。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of Periodontal Dressings: An Study.牙周敷料的生物相容性评估:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2500-S2502. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_335_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
Periodontal dressing: a review article.牙周敷料:一篇综述文章。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013 Fall;7(4):183-91. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2013.040. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
6
Light-cured resin "Barricaid" - An aesthetic and biocompatible dressing: A step ahead.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013 Nov;17(6):753-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.124494.
7
Evaluation of the healing response following placement of Coe-pak and an experimental pack after periodontal flap surgery.
J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Mar;23(3 Pt 1):188-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb02075.x.

本文引用的文献

3
Periodontitis and diabetes: a two-way relationship.牙周炎和糖尿病:双向关系。
Diabetologia. 2012 Jan;55(1):21-31. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2342-y. Epub 2011 Nov 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验