• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙周敷料的生物相容性评估:一项研究。

Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of Periodontal Dressings: An Study.

作者信息

Akhter Fatema

机构信息

Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2500-S2502. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_335_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_335_24
PMID:39346369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11426820/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periodontal dressings play a crucial role in post-operative management of periodontal surgeries by protecting surgical sites and promoting wound healing. Biocompatibility evaluation is essential to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these materials. This study aims to assess the biocompatibility of periodontal dressings through an approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, three commercially available periodontal dressings were evaluated for their biocompatibility. The Dressings were Dressing A: Coe-Pak Dressing B: Barricaid and Dressing C: PeriAcryl. Human gingival fibroblast cells were cultured and exposed to extracts of the dressings using the MTT assay to assess cell viability. Additionally, cell morphology and attachment were observed under a microscope. The experiment was conducted in triplicate for each dressing.

RESULTS

The MTT assay revealed that Dressing A exhibited the highest cell viability with an absorbance value of 0.8 ± 0.1, followed by Dressing B with a value of 0.6 ± 0.2 and Dressing C with a value of 0.5 ± 0.1. Microscopic analysis showed normal cell morphology and attachment in cells exposed to Dressing A and Dressing B extracts, while cells exposed to Dressing C exhibited slight detachment and irregular morphology.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that Dressing A and Dressing B demonstrate favorable biocompatibility profiles, as evidenced by higher cell viability and normal cell morphology.

摘要

背景

牙周敷料在牙周手术的术后管理中起着关键作用,可保护手术部位并促进伤口愈合。生物相容性评估对于确保这些材料的安全性和有效性至关重要。本研究旨在通过一种方法评估牙周敷料的生物相容性。

材料与方法

在本研究中,对三种市售牙周敷料的生物相容性进行了评估。这些敷料分别为:敷料A:Coe-Pak;敷料B:Barricaid;敷料C:PeriAcryl。培养人牙龈成纤维细胞,并使用MTT法将其暴露于敷料提取物中以评估细胞活力。此外,在显微镜下观察细胞形态和附着情况。每种敷料的实验均重复进行三次。

结果

MTT法显示,敷料A的细胞活力最高,吸光度值为0.8±0.1,其次是敷料B,值为0.6±0.2,敷料C的值为0.5±0.1。显微镜分析表明,暴露于敷料A和敷料B提取物的细胞形态和附着正常,而暴露于敷料C的细胞表现出轻微 detachment 和不规则形态。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,敷料A和敷料B表现出良好的生物相容性,细胞活力较高和细胞形态正常证明了这一点。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of Periodontal Dressings: An Study.牙周敷料的生物相容性评估:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2500-S2502. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_335_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings.Coe-Pak牙周敷料与Reso-Pac牙周敷料生物效应的体外比较
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2017 Mar 31;8(1):e3. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2017.8103. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.
3
Gingival Tissue Response Following Placement of a Light Cure Dressing and a Non-eugenol Dressing after Periodontal Flap Procedure: A Comparative Clinical Study.
J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2018 Jan-Jun;9(1):65-71. doi: 10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_75_17.
4
Effects of periodontal dressings on fibroblasts and gingival wound healing in dogs.牙周敷料对犬成纤维细胞和牙龈伤口愈合的影响。
Acta Vet Hung. 2004;52(1):33-46. doi: 10.1556/AVet.52.2004.1.4.
5
Periodontal dressing: a review article.牙周敷料:一篇综述文章。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013 Fall;7(4):183-91. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2013.040. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
6
Light-cured resin "Barricaid" - An aesthetic and biocompatible dressing: A step ahead.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013 Nov;17(6):753-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.124494.
7
Evaluation of the healing response following placement of Coe-pak and an experimental pack after periodontal flap surgery.
J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Mar;23(3 Pt 1):188-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb02075.x.
8
Application of hydrogel wound dressings in cell therapy-approaches to assessment in vitro.水凝胶伤口敷料在细胞治疗中的应用——体外评估方法
Int J Burns Trauma. 2023 Apr 15;13(2):13-32. eCollection 2023.
9
Cytocompatibility of periodontal dressing materials in fibroblast and primary human osteoblast-like cultures.
Clin Oral Investig. 1999 Mar;3(1):41-8. doi: 10.1007/s007840050077.
10
Effect of Periodontal Dressing on Wound Healing and Patient Satisfaction Following Periodontal Flap Surgery.牙周敷料对牙周翻瓣术后伤口愈合及患者满意度的影响。
J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Feb;12(2):151-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Gelatin-polysaccharide composite scaffolds for 3D cell culture and tissue engineering: Towards natural therapeutics.用于三维细胞培养和组织工程的明胶-多糖复合支架:迈向天然疗法。
Bioeng Transl Med. 2018 Dec 28;4(1):96-115. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10124. eCollection 2019 Jan.
2
3D tumor models: history, advances and future perspectives.3D 肿瘤模型:历史、进展与未来展望。
Future Oncol. 2014 May;10(7):1311-27. doi: 10.2217/fon.13.274.
3
Periodontitis and diabetes: a two-way relationship.牙周炎和糖尿病:双向关系。
Diabetologia. 2012 Jan;55(1):21-31. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2342-y. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
4
3D cell culture: a review of current approaches and techniques.3D细胞培养:当前方法与技术综述
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;695:1-15. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-984-0_1.
5
Local anti-infective therapy: pharmacological agents. A systematic review.局部抗感染治疗:药物制剂。一项系统评价
Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):79-98. doi: 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.79.
6
Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays.用于细胞生长和存活的快速比色测定法:应用于增殖和细胞毒性测定。
J Immunol Methods. 1983 Dec 16;65(1-2):55-63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.
7
Rapid colorimetric assay for cell growth and survival. Modifications to the tetrazolium dye procedure giving improved sensitivity and reliability.用于细胞生长和存活的快速比色测定法。对四氮唑染料程序的改进提高了灵敏度和可靠性。
J Immunol Methods. 1986 May 22;89(2):271-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(86)90368-6.