• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能治理:公共卫生面临的挑战。

AI Governance: A Challenge for Public Health.

机构信息

School of Engineering Design and Innovation, Penn State University, University Park, PA, United States.

Department of Anthropology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Sep 30;10:e58358. doi: 10.2196/58358.

DOI:10.2196/58358
PMID:39347615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11457458/
Abstract

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) is structuralizing social, political, and economic determinants of health into the invisible algorithms that shape all facets of modern life. Nevertheless, AI holds immense potential as a public health tool, enabling beneficial objectives such as precision public health and medicine. Developing an AI governance framework that can maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of AI is a significant challenge. The benefits of public health engagement in AI governance could be extensive. Here, we describe how several public health concepts can enhance AI governance. Specifically, we explain how (1) harm reduction can provide a framework for navigating the governance debate between traditional regulation and "soft law" approaches; (2) a public health understanding of social determinants of health is crucial to optimally weigh the potential risks and benefits of AI; (3) public health ethics provides a toolset for guiding governance decisions where individual interests intersect with collective interests; and (4) a One Health approach can improve AI governance effectiveness while advancing public health outcomes. Public health theories, perspectives, and innovations could substantially enrich and improve AI governance, creating a more equitable and socially beneficial path for AI development.

摘要

人工智能(AI)的迅速发展正在将社会、政治和经济健康决定因素结构化为隐形算法,这些算法塑造了现代生活的各个方面。然而,人工智能作为公共卫生工具具有巨大的潜力,可以实现精准公共卫生和医学等有益目标。制定一个能够最大化人工智能的利益和最小化风险的人工智能治理框架是一个重大挑战。公共卫生参与人工智能治理的好处可能是广泛的。在这里,我们描述了一些公共卫生概念如何增强人工智能治理。具体来说,我们解释了(1)减少伤害如何为在传统监管和“软法”方法之间的治理辩论提供框架;(2)对健康的社会决定因素的公共卫生理解对于最佳权衡人工智能的潜在风险和利益至关重要;(3)公共卫生伦理学为指导治理决策提供了工具,在这些决策中,个人利益与集体利益相交织;以及(4)一种“同一健康”方法可以提高人工智能治理的有效性,同时推进公共卫生成果。公共卫生理论、观点和创新可以极大地丰富和改进人工智能治理,为人工智能的发展开辟一条更加公平和有益社会的道路。

相似文献

1
AI Governance: A Challenge for Public Health.人工智能治理:公共卫生面临的挑战。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Sep 30;10:e58358. doi: 10.2196/58358.
2
Research ethics and artificial intelligence for global health: perspectives from the global forum on bioethics in research.研究伦理与全球健康中的人工智能:来自全球研究生物伦理论坛的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Apr 18;25(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01044-w.
3
Human-centricity in AI governance: A systemic approach.人工智能治理中的以人类为中心:一种系统方法。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Feb 14;6:976887. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.976887. eCollection 2023.
4
Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence.可信医疗人工智能的伦理与治理。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9.
5
Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Population Health and the Public's Role in Its Governance: Perspectives From a Citizen and Expert Panel.人工智能在人口健康中的伦理影响及公众在其治理中的作用:来自公民和专家小组的观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 27;25:e44357. doi: 10.2196/44357.
6
Who is responsible? US Public perceptions of AI governance through the lenses of trust and ethics.谁来负责?通过信任和道德视角看美国公众对人工智能治理的看法。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Jul;33(5):654-672. doi: 10.1177/09636625231224592. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
7
Research agenda for using artificial intelligence in health governance: interpretive scoping review and framework.卫生治理中使用人工智能的研究议程:诠释性范围综述与框架
BioData Min. 2023 Oct 31;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13040-023-00346-w.
8
Empowering nurses to champion Health equity & BE FAIR: Bias elimination for fair and responsible AI in healthcare.赋予护士权力,倡导健康公平并做到公平公正:消除医疗保健中人工智能的偏见,实现公平且负责任的人工智能。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Jan;57(1):130-139. doi: 10.1111/jnu.13007. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
9
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
10
Legal concerns in health-related artificial intelligence: a scoping review protocol.健康相关人工智能的法律问题:范围综述方案
Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 17;11(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01939-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators to Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Diabetes Management from Healthcare Workers' Perspective: A Scoping Review.从医护人员视角看人工智能在糖尿病管理中应用的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Aug 1;61(8):1403. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081403.
2
Harnessing artificial intelligence for enhanced public health surveillance: a narrative review.利用人工智能加强公共卫生监测:一篇叙述性综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;13:1601151. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1601151. eCollection 2025.
3
Development of an AI-Assisted System for Automatic Recognition and Localization Marking of Colonic Polyps (With Video).一种用于结肠息肉自动识别与定位标记的人工智能辅助系统的开发(附视频)
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul;40(7):1797-1808. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16980. Epub 2025 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Navigating New Legal Guardrails and Emerging AI Challenges.驾驭新的法律护栏和新兴的人工智能挑战。
J Law Med Ethics. 2024;52(S1):70-74. doi: 10.1017/jme.2024.40. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
2
Case study on communicating with research ethics committees about minimizing risk through software: an application for record linkage in secondary data analysis.关于与研究伦理委员会就通过软件降低风险进行沟通的案例研究:二次数据分析中记录链接的应用
JAMIA Open. 2024 Feb 29;7(1):ooae010. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae010. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Leveraging IP for AI governance.利用知识产权进行人工智能治理。
Science. 2023 Feb 17;379(6633):646-648. doi: 10.1126/science.add2202. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Artificial intelligence and health inequities in primary care: a systematic scoping review and framework.人工智能与初级保健中的健康不平等:系统综述和框架
Fam Med Community Health. 2022 Nov;10(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2022-001670.
5
Artificial Intelligence, Intersectionality, and the Future of Public Health.人工智能、交叉性与公共卫生的未来。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jan;111(1):98-100. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306006.
6
Social and Structural Determinants of Health Inequities in Maternal Health.孕产妇健康不平等的社会和结构决定因素。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Feb;30(2):230-235. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8882. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
7
Social Media Use and Adolescent Mental Health: Findings From the UK Millennium Cohort Study.社交媒体使用与青少年心理健康:来自英国千禧队列研究的结果
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Jan 4;6:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.12.005. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
Increasing Suicide Rates in Early Adolescent Girls in the United States and the Equalization of Sex Disparity in Suicide: The Need to Investigate the Role of Social Media.美国青春期早期女孩自杀率上升及自杀性别差异的均等化:探究社交媒体作用的必要性
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193916. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3916.
9
A Bridge Back to the Future: Public Health Ethics, Bioethics, and Environmental Ethics.通向未来的桥梁:公共卫生伦理学、生命伦理学和环境伦理学。
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Sep;17(9):5-12. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1353164.
10
The genesis of public health ethics.公共卫生伦理的起源。
Bioethics. 2004 Nov;18(6):473-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00412.x.