• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从医护人员视角看人工智能在糖尿病管理中应用的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述

Barriers and Facilitators to Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Diabetes Management from Healthcare Workers' Perspective: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Cangelosi Giovanni, Conti Andrea, Caggianelli Gabriele, Panella Massimiliano, Petrelli Fabio, Mancin Stefano, Ratti Matteo, Masini Alice

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Experimental Medicine and "Stefani Scuri" Public Health Department, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.

Department of Translational Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Aug 1;61(8):1403. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081403.

DOI:10.3390/medicina61081403
PMID:40870448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12387811/
Abstract

Diabetes is a global public health challenge, with increasing prevalence worldwide. The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in the management of this condition offers potential benefits in improving healthcare outcomes. This study primarily investigates the barriers and facilitators perceived by healthcare professionals in the adoption of AI. Secondarily, by analyzing both quantitative and qualitative data collected, it aims to support the potential development of AI-based programs for diabetes management, with particular focus on a possible bottom-up approach. A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines for reporting and registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF) database. The study selection process was conducted in two phases-title/abstract screening and full-text review-independently by three researchers, with a fourth resolving conflicts. Data were extracted and assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools. The included studies were synthesized narratively, combining both quantitative and qualitative analyses to ensure methodological rigor and contextual depth. : The adoption of AI tools in diabetes management is influenced by several barriers, including perceived unsatisfactory clinical performance, high costs, issues related to data security and decision-making transparency, as well as limited training among healthcare workers. Key facilitators include improved clinical efficiency, ease of use, time-saving, and organizational support, which contribute to broader acceptance of the technology. : The active and continuous involvement of healthcare workers represents a valuable opportunity to develop more effective, reliable, and well-integrated AI solutions in clinical practice. Our findings emphasize the importance of a bottom-up approach and highlight how adequate training and organizational support can help overcome existing barriers, promoting sustainable and equitable innovation aligned with public health priorities.

摘要

糖尿病是一项全球性的公共卫生挑战,在全球范围内的患病率不断上升。在这种疾病的管理中实施人工智能(AI)有望改善医疗保健结果。本研究主要调查医疗保健专业人员在采用人工智能时所察觉到的障碍和促进因素。其次,通过分析收集到的定量和定性数据,旨在支持基于人工智能的糖尿病管理项目的潜在发展,特别关注一种可能的自下而上的方法。按照PRISMA-ScR报告指南进行了一项范围综述,并在开放科学框架(OSF)数据库中进行了注册。研究选择过程分两个阶段进行——标题/摘要筛选和全文评审——由三名研究人员独立进行,第四名研究人员解决冲突。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)工具提取和评估数据。对纳入的研究进行了叙述性综合,结合定量和定性分析,以确保方法的严谨性和背景深度。:糖尿病管理中人工智能工具的采用受到多种障碍的影响,包括临床性能不尽人意、成本高昂、与数据安全和决策透明度相关的问题,以及医护人员培训有限。关键的促进因素包括提高临床效率、易用性、节省时间和组织支持,这些因素有助于更广泛地接受该技术。:医护人员的积极持续参与为在临床实践中开发更有效、可靠且整合良好的人工智能解决方案提供了宝贵机会。我们的研究结果强调了自下而上方法的重要性,并突出了充分的培训和组织支持如何有助于克服现有障碍,促进与公共卫生优先事项相一致的可持续和公平创新。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b24/12387811/f3acb06df4d5/medicina-61-01403-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b24/12387811/8a2254d03dd8/medicina-61-01403-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b24/12387811/f3acb06df4d5/medicina-61-01403-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b24/12387811/8a2254d03dd8/medicina-61-01403-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b24/12387811/f3acb06df4d5/medicina-61-01403-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators to Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Diabetes Management from Healthcare Workers' Perspective: A Scoping Review.从医护人员视角看人工智能在糖尿病管理中应用的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Aug 1;61(8):1403. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081403.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
What Helps or Hinders Annual Wellness Visits for Detection and Management of Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults? A Scoping Review Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.哪些因素有助于或阻碍老年人进行年度健康检查以检测和管理认知障碍?一项以实施研究综合框架为指导的范围综述
Nurs Rep. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):295. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15080295.
4
Trust in Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems Among Health Care Workers: Systematic Review.医疗工作者对基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统的信任:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 29;27:e69678. doi: 10.2196/69678.
5
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
6
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
7
Health Care Social Robots in the Age of Generative AI: Protocol for a Scoping Review.生成式人工智能时代的医疗保健社交机器人:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 14;14:e63017. doi: 10.2196/63017.
8
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
9
Barriers and Facilitators in Implementing a Telemonitoring Application for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Health Professionals: Ancillary Implementation Study of the NeLLY (New Health e-Link in the Lyon Region) Stepped-Wedge Randomized Controlled Trial.慢性肾脏病患者及医疗专业人员实施远程监测应用的障碍与促进因素:NeLLY(里昂地区新型健康电子链接)阶梯楔形随机对照试验的辅助实施研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jan 22;13:e50014. doi: 10.2196/50014.
10
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险

本文引用的文献

1
Top 10 Public Health Challenges for 2024: Charting a New Direction for Global Health Security.2024年十大公共卫生挑战:绘制全球卫生安全新方向
Public Health Chall. 2024 Dec 30;4(1):e70022. doi: 10.1002/puh2.70022. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Top 10 public health challenges to track in 2023: Shifting focus beyond a global pandemic.2023年需关注的十大公共卫生挑战:将重点从全球大流行转移开来。
Public Health Chall. 2023 May 2;2(2):e86. doi: 10.1002/puh2.86. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Physician perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in healthcare: a cross-sectional study of child-focused care in a Turkish tertiary hospital.
医生对医疗保健领域人工智能的看法:对土耳其一家三级医院以儿童为重点的护理的横断面研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Nov;203:106003. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106003. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
4
Ethical framework for responsible foundational models in medical imaging.医学成像中负责任基础模型的伦理框架。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 19;12:1544501. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1544501. eCollection 2025.
5
User Requirements and Conceptual Design for an Electronic Data Platform for Interhospital Transfer Between Acute Care Hospitals: User-Centered Design Study.急症医院间院际转运电子数据平台的用户需求与概念设计:以用户为中心的设计研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 30;12:e67884. doi: 10.2196/67884.
6
Perspectives of physicians, nurses, and patients on the use of artificial intelligence and robotic nurses in healthcare.医生、护士和患者对医疗保健中人工智能和机器人护士使用的看法。
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Jun;72(2):e70017. doi: 10.1111/inr.70017.
7
The Benefits and Challenges of Digitally-Enabled Cardiology.数字技术赋能心脏病学的益处与挑战
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2025 May 23;86(5):1-6. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2024.0899. Epub 2025 May 15.
8
Patients' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Acceptance, Challenges, and Use in Medical Care: Qualitative Study.患者对人工智能在医疗保健中的接受度、挑战及应用的认知:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 15;27:e70487. doi: 10.2196/70487.
9
Effectiveness of AI-driven interventions in glycemic control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.人工智能驱动的干预措施在血糖控制中的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2025 Aug;19(4):345-354. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2025.05.004. Epub 2025 May 12.
10
Comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for childhood obesity in China and future intervention strategies.中国儿童肥胖危险因素的综合系统评价与Meta分析及未来干预策略
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Apr 23;58:101553. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101553. eCollection 2025 May.