Woodward Eva N, Oliver Karen Anderson, Drummond Karen L, Bartnik Mary Kate, McCorkindale Amanda, Meit Scott S, Owen Richard R, Kirchner JoAnn E
Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System.
Mental Health Service, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System.
Psychol Serv. 2024 Sep 30. doi: 10.1037/ser0000903.
Often in implementation science efforts, an intervention originated by research funding does not continue in clinical practice after funding ends, or if it does, the process by which it was sustained remains known only to the implementation research or clinical teams. From 2018 to 2020, we implemented a complex telehealth interdisciplinary behavioral health program supported by research funding. The intervention was Primary Care Mental Health Integration (PCMHI) delivered via televideo from a large parent medical facility to rural satellite clinics (tele-PCMHI) within the Veterans Health Administration. Two implementation facilitators worked closely with clinical leaders and staff to plan, launch, and sustain tele-PCMHI across four sites. The intervention is still maintained by the clinical service and has spread to eight sites. Based on ethnographic and qualitative data collected weekly over 2 years, we categorized sustainment strategies across distinct time periods for this complex program, theoretically grounded in the Dynamic Sustainability Framework, emphasizing changes to adapt intervention fit to rapidly changing context. To contextualize, we identified barriers and strengths, such as difficulty training staff to use new equipment, restructuring clinic workflow, and determining suicide risk management remotely. New barriers arose, and, thus, new strategies were needed to continue implementing at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Different strategies at different stages of implementation allowed sustainment to be a dynamic and evolving process. Plus, proactive and persistent planning for sustainment early in the effort, along with alignment with performance metrics and national policy, supported continued delivery in real-world organized care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
在实施科学工作中,由研究资金发起的干预措施在资金结束后往往不会在临床实践中持续下去,或者即便持续了,其维持过程也只有实施研究团队或临床团队知晓。2018年至2020年期间,我们实施了一项由研究资金支持的复杂远程医疗跨学科行为健康项目。干预措施是通过电视视频从一家大型上级医疗机构向退伍军人健康管理局内的农村卫星诊所提供初级保健心理健康整合服务(远程初级保健心理健康整合服务,tele-PCMHI)。两名实施促进者与临床负责人及工作人员密切合作,在四个地点规划、启动并维持远程初级保健心理健康整合服务。该干预措施仍由临床服务部门维持,并已扩展到八个地点。基于在两年时间里每周收集的人种志和定性数据,我们根据动态可持续性框架从理论上对这个复杂项目在不同时间段的维持策略进行了分类,强调进行调整以使干预措施适应快速变化的环境。具体而言,我们识别出了障碍和优势,比如培训工作人员使用新设备的困难、重组诊所工作流程以及远程确定自杀风险管理等。新的障碍出现了,因此在2020年新冠疫情爆发之初需要新的策略来继续实施。实施不同阶段的不同策略使得维持成为一个动态且不断演变的过程。此外,在工作早期对维持进行积极且持续的规划,以及与绩效指标和国家政策保持一致,支持了在现实世界有组织的护理中持续提供服务。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)