• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免疫相关基因作为早期脓毒性休克潜在生物标志物的鉴定

Identification of Immune-Related Genes as Potential Biomarkers in Early Septic Shock.

作者信息

Liu Beibei, Fan Yonghua, Zhang Xianjing, Li Huaqing, Gao Fei, Shang Wenli, Hu Juntao, Tang Zhanhong

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Taian, China.

Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.

出版信息

Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2025;186(3):264-279. doi: 10.1159/000540949. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1159/000540949
PMID:39348809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11887992/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Septic shock, a severe manifestation of infection-induced systemic immune response, poses a critical threat resulting in life-threatening multi-organ failure. Early diagnosis and intervention are imperative due to the potential for irreversible organ damage. However, specific and sensitive detection tools for the diagnosis of septic shock are still lacking.

METHODS

Gene expression files of early septic shock were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. CIBERSORT analysis was used to evaluate immune cell infiltration. Genes related to immunity and disease progression were identified using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), followed by enrichment analysis. CytoHubba was then employed to identify hub genes, and their relationships with immune cells were explored through correlation analysis. Blood samples from healthy controls and patients with early septic shock were collected to validate the expression of hub genes, and an external dataset was used to validate their diagnostic efficacy.

RESULTS

Twelve immune cells showed significant infiltration differences in early septic shock compared to control, such as neutrophils, M0 macrophages, and natural killer cells. The identified immune and disease-related genes were mainly enriched in immune, cell signaling, and metabolism pathways. In addition, six hub genes were identified (PECAM1, F11R, ITGAL, ICAM3, HK3, and MCEMP1), all significantly associated with M0 macrophages and exhibiting an area under curve of over 0.7. These genes exhibited abnormal expression in patients with early septic shock. External datasets and real-time qPCR validation supported the robustness of these findings.

CONCLUSION

Six immune-related hub genes may be potential biomarkers for early septic shock.

INTRODUCTION

Septic shock, a severe manifestation of infection-induced systemic immune response, poses a critical threat resulting in life-threatening multi-organ failure. Early diagnosis and intervention are imperative due to the potential for irreversible organ damage. However, specific and sensitive detection tools for the diagnosis of septic shock are still lacking.

METHODS

Gene expression files of early septic shock were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. CIBERSORT analysis was used to evaluate immune cell infiltration. Genes related to immunity and disease progression were identified using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), followed by enrichment analysis. CytoHubba was then employed to identify hub genes, and their relationships with immune cells were explored through correlation analysis. Blood samples from healthy controls and patients with early septic shock were collected to validate the expression of hub genes, and an external dataset was used to validate their diagnostic efficacy.

RESULTS

Twelve immune cells showed significant infiltration differences in early septic shock compared to control, such as neutrophils, M0 macrophages, and natural killer cells. The identified immune and disease-related genes were mainly enriched in immune, cell signaling, and metabolism pathways. In addition, six hub genes were identified (PECAM1, F11R, ITGAL, ICAM3, HK3, and MCEMP1), all significantly associated with M0 macrophages and exhibiting an area under curve of over 0.7. These genes exhibited abnormal expression in patients with early septic shock. External datasets and real-time qPCR validation supported the robustness of these findings.

CONCLUSION

Six immune-related hub genes may be potential biomarkers for early septic shock.

摘要

引言

感染性休克是感染诱导的全身免疫反应的严重表现,会造成危及生命的多器官功能衰竭,带来重大威胁。由于存在不可逆器官损伤的可能性,早期诊断和干预势在必行。然而,目前仍缺乏用于诊断感染性休克的特异性和敏感性检测工具。

方法

从基因表达综合数据库(GEO)获取早期感染性休克的基因表达文件。使用CIBERSORT分析评估免疫细胞浸润情况。采用加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)识别与免疫和疾病进展相关的基因,随后进行富集分析。接着利用CytoHubba识别枢纽基因,并通过相关性分析探究其与免疫细胞的关系。收集健康对照者和早期感染性休克患者的血样以验证枢纽基因的表达,并使用外部数据集验证其诊断效能。

结果

与对照组相比,12种免疫细胞在早期感染性休克中表现出显著的浸润差异,如中性粒细胞、M0巨噬细胞和自然杀伤细胞。所识别的免疫和疾病相关基因主要富集于免疫、细胞信号传导和代谢途径。此外,识别出6个枢纽基因(PECAM1、F11R、ITGAL、ICAM3、HK3和MCEMP1),均与M0巨噬细胞显著相关,曲线下面积均超过0.7。这些基因在早期感染性休克患者中表现出异常表达。外部数据集和实时定量PCR验证支持了这些结果的可靠性。

结论

6个免疫相关枢纽基因可能是早期感染性休克的潜在生物标志物。

引言

感染性休克是感染诱导的全身免疫反应的严重表现,会造成危及生命的多器官功能衰竭,带来重大威胁。由于存在不可逆器官损伤的可能性,早期诊断和干预势在必行。然而,目前仍缺乏用于诊断感染性休克的特异性和敏感性检测工具。

方法

从基因表达综合数据库(GEO)获取早期感染性休克的基因表达文件。使用CIBERSORT分析评估免疫细胞浸润情况。采用加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)识别与免疫和疾病进展相关的基因,随后进行富集分析。接着利用CytoHubba识别枢纽基因,并通过相关性分析探究其与免疫细胞的关系。收集健康对照者和早期感染性休克患者的血样以验证枢纽基因的表达,并使用外部数据集验证其诊断效能。

结果

与对照组相比,12种免疫细胞在早期感染性休克中表现出显著的浸润差异,如中性粒细胞、M0巨噬细胞和自然杀伤细胞。所识别的免疫和疾病相关基因主要富集于免疫、细胞信号传导和代谢途径。此外,识别出6个枢纽基因(PECAM1、F11R、ITGAL、ICAM3、HK3和MCEMP1),均与M0巨噬细胞显著相关,曲线下面积均超过0.7。这些基因在早期感染性休克患者中表现出异常表达。外部数据集和实时定量PCR验证支持了这些结果的可靠性。

结论

6个免疫相关枢纽基因可能是早期感染性休克的潜在生物标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/3f4b462808b2/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/62ad8383ba5d/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/3a65454efb1b/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/7dfbc0ee037b/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/969db651c1b4/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/8ca672d8da09/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/dcb89b4333af/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/2348b9bfa89c/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/3a72c40db8ae/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/3f4b462808b2/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/62ad8383ba5d/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/3a65454efb1b/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/7dfbc0ee037b/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/969db651c1b4/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/8ca672d8da09/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/dcb89b4333af/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/2348b9bfa89c/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/3a72c40db8ae/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/627b/11887992/3f4b462808b2/iaa-2025-0186-0003-540949_F09.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification of Immune-Related Genes as Potential Biomarkers in Early Septic Shock.免疫相关基因作为早期脓毒性休克潜在生物标志物的鉴定
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2025;186(3):264-279. doi: 10.1159/000540949. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Six potential biomarkers in septic shock: a deep bioinformatics and prospective observational study.脓毒性休克的 6 个潜在生物标志物:一项深入的生物信息学和前瞻性观察研究。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jun 8;14:1184700. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1184700. eCollection 2023.
3
Predicting patients with septic shock and sepsis through analyzing whole-blood expression of NK cell-related hub genes using an advanced machine learning framework.使用先进的机器学习框架,通过分析自然杀伤(NK)细胞相关核心基因的全血表达来预测感染性休克和脓毒症患者。
Front Immunol. 2024 Nov 28;15:1493895. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1493895. eCollection 2024.
4
Integrating bioinformatics and machine learning for comprehensive analysis and validation of diagnostic biomarkers and immune cell infiltration characteristics in pediatric septic shock.整合生物信息学和机器学习用于儿童感染性休克诊断生物标志物及免疫细胞浸润特征的综合分析与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 26;15(1):10456. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95028-4.
5
Mitophagy-related genes could facilitate the development of septic shock during immune infiltration.自噬相关基因可能有助于免疫浸润时脓毒性休克的发展。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 20;102(42):e35154. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035154.
6
Identification and Verification of Potential Core Genes in Pediatric Septic Shock.小儿脓毒性休克潜在核心基因的鉴定和验证。
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2022;25(13):2228-2239. doi: 10.2174/1386207325666220310110902.
7
Differentially Infiltrated Identification of Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers Associated with Immune Infiltration in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.差异浸润鉴定与鼻咽癌免疫浸润相关的新型诊断生物标志物。
Dis Markers. 2022 Nov 17;2022:3934704. doi: 10.1155/2022/3934704. eCollection 2022.
8
Identification of Hub Biomarkers and Immune and Inflammation Pathways Contributing to Kawasaki Disease Progression with RT-qPCR Verification.通过逆转录定量聚合酶链反应验证确定促成川崎病进展的关键生物标志物以及免疫和炎症途径。
J Immunol Res. 2023 Apr 6;2023:1774260. doi: 10.1155/2023/1774260. eCollection 2023.
9
Analysis of signature genes and association with immune cells infiltration in pediatric septic shock.分析儿童感染性休克的特征基因与免疫细胞浸润的关系。
Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 10;13:1056750. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1056750. eCollection 2022.
10
Identification and verification of the optimal feature genes of ferroptosis in thyroid-associated orbitopathy.甲状腺相关眼病中铁死亡最佳特征基因的鉴定与验证
Front Immunol. 2024 Dec 13;15:1422497. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1422497. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of Potential Biomarkers of Septic Shock Based on Pathway and Transcriptome Analyses of Immune-Related Genes.基于免疫相关基因的通路和转录组分析鉴定脓毒性休克的潜在生物标志物。
Genet Res (Camb). 2023 Aug 5;2023:9991613. doi: 10.1155/2023/9991613. eCollection 2023.
2
Bioinformatic Analysis and Machine Learning Methods in Neonatal Sepsis: Identification of Biomarkers and Immune Infiltration.新生儿败血症中的生物信息学分析与机器学习方法:生物标志物的识别与免疫浸润
Biomedicines. 2023 Jun 28;11(7):1853. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11071853.
3
Prognostic Value of HIF-1α-Induced Genes in Sepsis/Septic Shock.
缺氧诱导因子-1α 诱导基因在脓毒症/脓毒性休克中的预后价值。
Med Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 12;11(2):41. doi: 10.3390/medsci11020041.
4
Six potential biomarkers in septic shock: a deep bioinformatics and prospective observational study.脓毒性休克的 6 个潜在生物标志物:一项深入的生物信息学和前瞻性观察研究。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jun 8;14:1184700. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1184700. eCollection 2023.
5
Cellular Immuno-Profile in Septic Human Host: A Scoping Review.脓毒症人类宿主的细胞免疫图谱:一项范围综述
Biology (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;11(11):1626. doi: 10.3390/biology11111626.
6
SEPSIS DEFINITION: WHAT'S NEW 
IN THE TREATMENT GUIDELINES.脓毒症定义:治疗指南中的新进展。
Acta Clin Croat. 2022 Jun;61(Suppl 1):67-72. doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s1.11.
7
Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: mechanisms, diagnosis and current treatment options.脓毒症导致的免疫抑制:机制、诊断和当前治疗选择。
Mil Med Res. 2022 Oct 9;9(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40779-022-00422-y.
8
Metabolic reprogramming consequences of sepsis: adaptations and contradictions.脓毒症代谢重编程的后果:适应与矛盾。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022 Jul 29;79(8):456. doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04490-0.
9
Analysis and Experimental Validation of Rheumatoid Arthritis Innate Immunity Gene CYFIP2 and Pan-Cancer.类风湿关节炎先天免疫基因 CYFIP2 的分析和实验验证及泛癌分析
Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 11;13:954848. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.954848. eCollection 2022.
10
Junctional adhesion molecule-A deletion increases phagocytosis and improves survival in a murine model of sepsis.连接黏附分子-A 缺失可增加吞噬作用并改善脓毒症小鼠模型的存活率。
JCI Insight. 2022 Aug 22;7(16):e156255. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.156255.