D. Angioni, Institut Hospitalo Universitaire HealthAge, Alzheimer's Disease Research and Clinical Center, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France,
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(5):1219-1227. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.112.
Recent positive results of three phase III anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody trials are transforming the landscape of disease-modifying therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease, following several decades of failures. Indeed, all three trials have met their primary endpoints. However, the absolute size of the benefit measured in these trials has generated a debate on whether the change scores observed on clinical outcome assessments represent a clinically meaningful benefit to patients. An evidence-based conclusion is urgently required to inform decision-making related to the approval, reimbursement, and ultimately, the management of emerging therapies in clinical practice. The EU-US CTAD Task Force met in Boston to address this important question. The current state-of-the-art knowledge for interpreting clinical meaningfulness of AD clinical trial results, including the point of view of patients and study partners on what is clinically meaningful, was discussed and is summarized here. A combination of methodologies to address the challenges emerged. There remain gaps in the understanding of clinical meaningfulness that only long-term longitudinal studies will be able to address.
最近三项三期抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体试验的积极结果正在改变阿尔茨海默病的疾病修饰治疗格局,此前几十年的尝试都以失败告终。事实上,所有三项试验都达到了主要终点。然而,这些试验中测量的获益绝对值引发了一场争论,即临床结果评估上观察到的变化分数是否代表对患者的临床获益。为了为与批准、报销相关的决策提供信息,并最终为新兴疗法在临床实践中的管理提供信息,迫切需要基于证据的结论。欧盟-美国 CTAD 工作组在波士顿开会讨论这个重要问题。目前对于解释 AD 临床试验结果的临床意义的最新知识,包括患者和研究伙伴对什么是临床意义的观点,进行了讨论,并在此总结。出现了一种结合多种方法来解决挑战的方法。对于临床意义的理解仍存在差距,只有长期纵向研究才能解决这些差距。