Product Development, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Early Clinical Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Sep;20(9):5889-5900. doi: 10.1002/alz.14050. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
Consensus definitions of meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) on the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) are needed. Existing estimates use clinician-rated anchors in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease (AD) populations. Incorporating the care partner perspective offers important insights, and evaluating biomarker-confirmed cohorts aligns estimates with ongoing trials.
Anchor-based analyses were conducted to evaluate MWPC on the CDR-SB in early AD (Tauriel; NCT03289143) using Caregiver Global Impression of Change in memory or daily activities.
Across time points and anchors, mean CDR-SB changes associated with the "somewhat worse" category ranged from 1.50 to 2.12 in early AD, 1.07 to 2.06 in mild cognitive impairment-AD, and 1.79 to 2.25 in mild AD.
The proposed ranges are appropriate to define meaningful progression on the CDR-SB in similar cohorts and support the interpretation of treatment benefit through MWPC analyses. Thresholds should be calibrated to the context of use; lower/higher thresholds may be applicable in studies of earlier/later disease over shorter/longer durations.
Within-patient CDR-SB change thresholds are provided using caregiver-rated anchors. 1.5 to 2.5 points may be an appropriate range in early AD trials of similar durations. Cumulative distribution function plots illustrate the benefit of a given treatment. When selecting thresholds, the target population and study design should be considered.
需要对临床痴呆评定量表-框总数(CDR-SB)上有意义的患者内变化(MWPC)达成共识定义。现有的估计使用临床诊断为阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的临床医生评定锚点。纳入护理人员的观点提供了重要的见解,评估生物标志物确认的队列使估计与正在进行的试验保持一致。
使用记忆或日常活动的护理人员全球变化印象(CGIC)作为锚点,对早期 AD(Tauriel;NCT03289143)的 CDR-SB 上的 MWPC 进行基于锚点的分析。
在不同的时间点和锚点上,与“稍差”类别相关的 CDR-SB 平均变化在早期 AD 中为 1.50 至 2.12,在轻度认知障碍-AD 中为 1.07 至 2.06,在轻度 AD 中为 1.79 至 2.25。
所提出的范围适用于在类似队列中定义 CDR-SB 上有意义的进展,并支持通过 MWPC 分析来解释治疗效果。阈值应根据使用情况进行校准;在研究疾病早期/晚期、持续时间较短/较长的研究中,可能需要较低/较高的阈值。
使用护理人员评定的锚点提供了患者内 CDR-SB 变化的阈值。在持续时间相似的早期 AD 试验中,1.5 至 2.5 点可能是一个合适的范围。累积分布函数图说明了给定治疗的获益。在选择阈值时,应考虑目标人群和研究设计。