• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测助产士与产科医生之间的协作实践:回归分析。

Predicting collaborative practice between midwives and obstetricians: A regression analysis.

作者信息

Beier Liesa, Thaqi Qendresa, Luyben Ans, Kimmich Nina, Naef Rahel

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Medical Sciences, Private University in the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Liechtenstein.

出版信息

Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Sep 24;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/192696. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.18332/ejm/192696
PMID:39351400
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11440071/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Effective collaborative practice between midwives and obstetricians improves patient safety and obstetrical outcomes, but its implementation remains challenging. Therefore, its determinants need to be better understood. This study examined factors impacting collaborative practice (CP) between these professional groups.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional survey that took place in Swiss hospital labor wards in 2021. Collaborative practice perceptions of 70 midwives (57.4% response rate) and 44 obstetricians (29.0% response rate) were assessed using the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale, with the score serving as the main outcome. A total of 13 individual, behavioral, and organizational predictors were analyzed by multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

Participants rated collaborative practice with a median score of 3.1 (IQR: 2.8-3.4) out of a maximum score of 4.0. Results showed that five predictors significantly influenced collaborative practice: type of profession (β= -0.180; 95% CI: -0.296 - -0.040, p=0.011), trust/respect (β=0.343; 95% CI: 0.085-0.040, p=0.000), shared visions/goals (β=0.218; 95% CI: 0.030-0.204, p=0.009), workplace (β=0.253; 95% CI: 0.089-0.445, p=0.004) and shared power (β=0.163; 95% CI: 0.042-0.222, p=0.015). The model explained 66% of the variance (adjusted R2) in collaborative practice in labor wards.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has identified key factors influencing CP in Swiss labor wards: workplace characteristics that require tailored CP models, and a power-sharing culture that fosters trust, respectful interactions and shared goals, requiring active exchange between midwives and obstetricians.

摘要

引言

助产士和产科医生之间有效的协作实践可提高患者安全性和产科结局,但实施起来仍具有挑战性。因此,需要更好地了解其决定因素。本研究调查了影响这些专业群体之间协作实践(CP)的因素。

方法

本研究是一项横断面调查,于2021年在瑞士医院的分娩病房进行。使用跨专业协作量表评估了70名助产士(回复率57.4%)和44名产科医生(回复率29.0%)对协作实践的看法,得分作为主要结果。通过多元线性回归分析了总共13个个体、行为和组织预测因素。

结果

参与者对协作实践的评分中位数为3.1(四分位距:2.8 - 3.4),满分是4.0。结果表明,五个预测因素对协作实践有显著影响:职业类型(β = -0.180;95%置信区间:-0.296 - -0.040,p = 0.011)、信任/尊重(β = 0.343;95%置信区间:0.085 - 0.040,p = 0.000)、共同愿景/目标(β = 0.218;95%置信区间:0.030 - 0.204,p = 0.009)、工作场所(β = 0.253;95%置信区间:0.089 - 0.445,p = 0.004)和权力共享(β = 0.163;95%置信区间:0.042 - 0.222,p = 0.015)。该模型解释了分娩病房协作实践中66%的方差(调整后的R2)。

结论

本研究确定了影响瑞士分娩病房CP的关键因素:需要量身定制CP模式的工作场所特征,以及促进信任、相互尊重的互动和共同目标的权力共享文化,这需要助产士和产科医生之间积极交流。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb73/11440071/c6d155d64fb3/EJM-8-56-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb73/11440071/c6d155d64fb3/EJM-8-56-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb73/11440071/c6d155d64fb3/EJM-8-56-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting collaborative practice between midwives and obstetricians: A regression analysis.预测助产士与产科医生之间的协作实践:回归分析。
Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Sep 24;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/192696. eCollection 2024.
2
How to Foster Effective Midwife-Obstetrician Collaboration on Labor and Birth Units: Qualitative Analysis of Experiences of Clinicians in the United States.如何在分娩单位促进有效的助产学-产科医生合作:对美国临床医生经验的定性分析。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Sep;67(5):552-560. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13382. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
3
Reliability and validity of Midwifery - Obstetrics Collaboration (MOC) scale: A tool to improve collaborative practice.助产-产科协作(MOC)量表的信度和效度:一种改善协作实践的工具。
Midwifery. 2021 May;96:102941. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102941. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
4
Interprofessional collaboration among care professionals in obstetrical care: are perceptions aligned?产科护理中护理专业人员的跨专业合作:观念是否一致?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):279-286. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006401. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
5
Midwife-physician collaboration: a conceptual framework for interprofessional collaborative practice.助产士与医生的合作:跨专业协作实践的概念框架
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Mar-Apr;60(2):128-39. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12204. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
6
Midwives' and Medical professionals' perspectives of collaborative practice at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital Maternity Unit, Malawi: The discovery phase of an appreciative inquiry project.马拉维伊丽莎白女王中央医院产科助产士与医学专业人员对协作实践的看法:一个积极探询项目的发现阶段
Malawi Med J. 2020 Mar;32(1):13-18. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v32i1.4.
7
What is normal progress in the first stage of labour? A vignette study of similarities and differences between midwives and obstetricians.第一产程的正常进展是怎样的?一项关于助产士和产科医生异同的案例研究。
Midwifery. 2016 Oct;41:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
8
How the past influences interprofessional collaboration between obstetricians and midwives in the Netherlands: Findings from a secondary analysis.过去如何影响荷兰产科医生和助产士之间的跨专业合作:二次分析的结果
J Interprof Care. 2016;30(1):71-6. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1064876. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
9
Models of maternity care in rural environments: barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives.农村环境中的孕产护理模式:与助产士开展跨专业合作的障碍和特征。
Midwifery. 2013 Jun;29(6):646-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
10
Cross-Disciplinary Perceptions of Structured Interprofessional Rounds in Promoting Teamwork Within an Academic Tertiary Care Obstetric Unit.跨学科视角下结构化跨专业查房对学术型三级护理产科单元团队协作的促进作用
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jun;124(6):1968-1977. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001890.

引用本文的文献

1
Interprofessional Collaboration in Obstetric and Midwifery Care-Multigroup Comparison of Midwives' and Physicians' Perspective.产科和助产护理中的跨专业协作——助产士与医生视角的多组比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 24;13(15):1798. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151798.

本文引用的文献

1
Key Maternity Care Stakeholders' Views on Midwives' Professional Autonomy.关键孕产妇保健利益相关者对助产士职业自主性的看法。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;11(9):1231. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091231.
2
How to Foster Effective Midwife-Obstetrician Collaboration on Labor and Birth Units: Qualitative Analysis of Experiences of Clinicians in the United States.如何在分娩单位促进有效的助产学-产科医生合作:对美国临床医生经验的定性分析。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Sep;67(5):552-560. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13382. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
3
Midwives' and Medical professionals' perspectives of collaborative practice at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital Maternity Unit, Malawi: The discovery phase of an appreciative inquiry project.
马拉维伊丽莎白女王中央医院产科助产士与医学专业人员对协作实践的看法:一个积极探询项目的发现阶段
Malawi Med J. 2020 Mar;32(1):13-18. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v32i1.4.
4
The development and psychometric evaluation of an interprofessional identity measure: Extended Professional Identity Scale (EPIS).一种跨专业身份测量工具的开发与心理测量评估:扩展专业身份量表(EPIS)。
J Interprof Care. 2020 Feb 3:1-13. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1713064.
5
Left alone with the emotional surge - A qualitative study of midwives' and obstetricians' experiences of severe events on the labour ward.独自面对情感冲击——助产士和产科医生在产房经历严重事件的定性研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020 Mar;23:100483. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2019.100483. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
6
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
7
[Measurement of attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration in an operating theatre - a cross-sectional study].[手术室中对跨专业协作态度的测量——一项横断面研究]
Pflege. 2019 Jun;32(3):157-164. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000661. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
8
How good is collaboration between maternity service providers in the Netherlands?荷兰产科服务提供者之间的合作情况如何?
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Dec 24;12:21-30. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S179811. eCollection 2019.
9
Nurses' perceptions of the dynamics and impacts of teamwork with physicians in labour and delivery.护士对分娩过程中与医生团队合作的动态及影响的认知。
J Interprof Care. 2018 Dec 30:1-11. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1562422.
10
Veiled midwifery in the baby factory - A grounded theory study.婴儿工厂的蒙面助产士——扎根理论研究。
Women Birth. 2019 Feb;32(1):80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 27.