• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰产科服务提供者之间的合作情况如何?

How good is collaboration between maternity service providers in the Netherlands?

作者信息

Cronie Doug, Rijnders Marlies, Jans Suze, Verhoeven Corine J, de Vries Raymond

机构信息

Department of Midwifery, OLVG (West) Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,

Department of Midwifery Science, Faculty of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands,

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Dec 24;12:21-30. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S179811. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S179811
PMID:30613150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6307488/
Abstract

AIMS

To examine the experiences of inter-professional collaboration of maternity service providers in the Netherlands and to identify potential enhancing and inhibiting factors for inter-professional collaboration within maternity care in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND

Good collaboration between health care professionals is a key element of safe, effective care, but creating a collaborative culture can be challenging. Good collaboration requires, among other things, negotiating different professional orientations and the organizational constraints of hierarchies and scheduling. Good collaboration is especially important in maternity care. In the Netherlands, suboptimal collaboration has been cited as a significant factor in maternal deaths and in adverse incidents occurring in hospitals during evenings, nights, and weekends. In spite of its importance for effective maternity care, little is known about the nature and quality of collaboration between maternity care professionals. In order to fill this gap, we examined the inter-professional collaboration within multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) providing maternity services in the Netherlands.

METHODS

Online survey of MDTs (consisting of hospital and PCMs, doctors, and carers) involved in the provision of maternity services in the Netherlands. We used a validated measure of collaboration (the Leiden Quality of Work Questionnaire) to analyze the attitudes of those involved in the provision of maternity services about multi-disciplinary collaboration in their work. We used descriptive and inferential statistics to assess differences between the groups.

RESULTS

40% of all respondents were not satisfied with collaboration within their MDT. Overall, mean collaboration scores (MCS) were low. We found significant differences in MCS between professional groups. Midwives - community and hospital based - were pessimistic about collaboration in future models of maternity care.

DISCUSSION

In the Netherlands, collaboration in maternity care is less than optimal. Poor collaboration is associated with negative consequences for patient safety and quality of care. Strategies to address suboptimal collaboration exist; however, no one-size-fits-all approach is identified in the literature.

CONCLUSION

Suboptimal collaboration exists within the midwifery model of care in the Netherlands and the relationship between care providers is under pressure. This could affect patient safety and quality of care, according to the literature.

PRÉCIS: This paper presents an in-depth examination of the nature of, and attitudes about, collaboration between members of the MDT involved in the provision of maternity services in the Netherlands.

摘要

目的

考察荷兰产科服务提供者的跨专业协作经历,并确定荷兰产科护理中跨专业协作的潜在促进因素和抑制因素。

背景

医疗保健专业人员之间的良好协作是安全、有效护理的关键要素,但营造协作文化可能具有挑战性。良好的协作除其他外,需要协商不同的专业方向以及层级和排班的组织限制。良好的协作在产科护理中尤为重要。在荷兰,协作欠佳被认为是孕产妇死亡以及医院在傍晚、夜间和周末发生不良事件的一个重要因素。尽管其对有效的产科护理很重要,但对于产科护理专业人员之间协作的性质和质量却知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,我们考察了荷兰提供产科服务的多学科团队(MDT)内部的跨专业协作。

方法

对参与荷兰产科服务提供的多学科团队(由医院和初级保健机构、医生及护理人员组成)进行在线调查。我们使用一种经过验证的协作度量工具(莱顿工作质量问卷)来分析参与产科服务提供的人员对其工作中多学科协作的态度。我们使用描述性和推断性统计来评估各群体之间的差异。

结果

所有受访者中有40%对其所在多学科团队内部的协作不满意。总体而言,平均协作得分(MCS)较低。我们发现专业群体之间的平均协作得分存在显著差异。社区和医院的助产士对未来产科护理模式中的协作持悲观态度。

讨论

在荷兰,产科护理中的协作不尽如人意。协作不佳会对患者安全和护理质量产生负面影响。存在解决协作欠佳问题的策略;然而,文献中未发现一种适用于所有情况的方法。

结论

荷兰助产护理模式中存在协作欠佳的情况,护理提供者之间的关系面临压力。根据文献,这可能会影响患者安全和护理质量。

摘要

本文深入考察了荷兰参与产科服务提供的多学科团队成员之间协作的性质和态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6d/6307488/c21d6864e33d/jmdh-12-021Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6d/6307488/c21d6864e33d/jmdh-12-021Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6d/6307488/c21d6864e33d/jmdh-12-021Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
How good is collaboration between maternity service providers in the Netherlands?荷兰产科服务提供者之间的合作情况如何?
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Dec 24;12:21-30. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S179811. eCollection 2019.
2
Collaboration of midwives in primary care midwifery practices with other maternity care providers.初级护理助产实践中的助产士与其他孕产妇护理提供者的合作。
Midwifery. 2017 Dec;55:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
3
Models of maternity care in rural environments: barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives.农村环境中的孕产护理模式:与助产士开展跨专业合作的障碍和特征。
Midwifery. 2013 Jun;29(6):646-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
4
Are midwives in the Netherlands satisfied with their jobs? A systematic examination of satisfaction levels among hospital and primary-care midwives in the Netherlands.荷兰的助产士对他们的工作满意吗?对荷兰医院和初级保健助产士满意度的系统检查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 13;19(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4454-x.
5
Understanding factors affecting collaboration between midwives and other health care professionals in a birth center and its affiliated Quebec hospital: a case study.了解影响分娩中心及其附属魁北克医院助产士与其他医护人员之间合作的因素:一项案例研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 26;17(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1381-x.
6
A focus group study of women's views and experiences of maternity care as delivered collaboratively by midwives and health visitors in England.英格兰助产士和保健访视员协作提供的产妇护理的女性观点和体验的焦点小组研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2127-0.
7
Opinions of professionals about integrating midwife- and obstetrician-led care in The Netherlands.荷兰专业人士对整合助产士主导和产科医生主导护理的看法。
Midwifery. 2016 Jun;37:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
8
Evaluation of primary care midwifery in The Netherlands: design and rationale of a dynamic cohort study (DELIVER).荷兰基层医疗助产士评估:一项动态队列研究(DELIVER)的设计与原理。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 20;12:69. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-69.
9
10
Interprofessional collaboration among care professionals in obstetrical care: are perceptions aligned?产科护理中护理专业人员的跨专业合作:观念是否一致?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):279-286. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006401. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Unpacking the black box of interprofessional collaboration within healthcare networks: a scoping review.剖析医疗网络中跨专业协作的黑箱:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 13;15(6):e101702. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101702.
2
Predicting collaborative practice between midwives and obstetricians: A regression analysis.预测助产士与产科医生之间的协作实践:回归分析。
Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Sep 24;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/192696. eCollection 2024.
3
The Dutch Solid Start program: describing the implementation and experiences of the program's first thousand days.

本文引用的文献

1
Sentinel Event Statistics Released for 2015.2015年发布的警讯事件统计数据。
Jt Comm Perspect. 2016 Apr;36(4):10.
2
Interprofessional collaboration among care professionals in obstetrical care: are perceptions aligned?产科护理中护理专业人员的跨专业合作:观念是否一致?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):279-286. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006401. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
3
The collaboration of general practitioners and nurses in primary care: a comparative analysis of concepts and practices in Slovenia and Spain.初级保健中全科医生与护士的合作:斯洛文尼亚和西班牙概念与实践的比较分析。
荷兰坚实起点计划:描述该计划头一千天的实施情况和经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 30;23(1):926. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09873-y.
4
Quality Improvement with Outcome Data in Integrated Obstetric Care Networks: Evaluating Collaboration and Learning Across Organizational Boundaries with an Action Research Approach.综合产科护理网络中基于结局数据的质量改进:采用行动研究方法评估跨组织边界的协作与学习
Int J Integr Care. 2023 May 26;23(2):21. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7035. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
5
Patients' Perspectives of Interprofessional Collaboration in Breast Cancer Unit.患者对乳腺癌科室跨专业协作的看法。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 23;11(3):332. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030332.
6
Interventions for vulnerable pregnant women: Factors influencing culturally appropriate implementation according to health professionals: A qualitative study.干预脆弱孕妇:影响卫生专业人员文化适宜实施的因素:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 3;17(8):e0272249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272249. eCollection 2022.
7
Evaluation of Normalization After Implementation of the Digital Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: Mixed Methods Study With a Questionnaire Survey and Focus Group Discussion.数字荷兰产科电话分诊系统实施后规范化评估:一项包含问卷调查和焦点小组讨论的混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 17;6(6):e33709. doi: 10.2196/33709.
8
Differentiating solitary brain metastases from glioblastoma by radiomics features derived from MRI and 18F-FDG-PET and the combined application of multiple models.基于 MRI 和 18F-FDG-PET 影像组学特征鉴别单发脑转移瘤与胶质母细胞瘤及多模型联合应用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 6;12(1):5722. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09803-8.
9
Implementation of a standard outcome set in perinatal care: a qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators from all stakeholder perspectives.围产期护理标准结局集的实施:从所有利益相关者角度对障碍和促进因素的定性分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 2;21(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06121-z.
10
Differentiation of supratentorial single brain metastasis and glioblastoma by using peri-enhancing oedema region-derived radiomic features and multiple classifiers.利用瘤周水肿区衍生的放射组学特征和多分类器对幕上单发脑转移瘤和胶质母细胞瘤进行鉴别。
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):3015-3022. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06460-w. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Sep;18(5):492-506. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000354. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
4
Opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders about integration of maternity care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands.产科护理专业人员及其他利益相关者对产科护理整合的看法:荷兰的一项定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 26;16(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0975-z.
5
Mini Review of Integrated Care and Implications for Advanced Practice Nurse Role.综合护理概述及其对高级执业护士角色的影响
Open Nurs J. 2016 Apr 30;10:78-89. doi: 10.2174/187443460160101078. eCollection 2016.
6
How the past influences interprofessional collaboration between obstetricians and midwives in the Netherlands: Findings from a secondary analysis.过去如何影响荷兰产科医生和助产士之间的跨专业合作:二次分析的结果
J Interprof Care. 2016;30(1):71-6. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1064876. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
7
Competition among health care providers: helpful or harmful?医疗服务提供者之间的竞争:有益还是有害?
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Apr;17(3):229-33. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0736-3.
8
Interprofessional collaboration in health care: Lessons to be learned from competitive sports.医疗保健中的跨专业协作:从竞技体育中汲取的经验教训。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2015 Jul;148(4):176-9. doi: 10.1177/1715163515588106.
9
Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: An integrative literature review.观察基层医疗团队中的跨专业协作实践:综合文献回顾。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jul;52(7):1217-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
10
An integrative review of facilitators and barriers influencing collaboration and teamwork between general practitioners and nurses working in general practice.对影响全科医疗中全科医生与护士之间协作及团队合作的促进因素和障碍的综合综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Sep;71(9):1973-85. doi: 10.1111/jan.12647. Epub 2015 Mar 3.