Université Paris Cité, Inserm, U970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, Integrative Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease, Paris, France.
University of Montpellier, INM, Inserm U1298, Montpellier, France.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2436723. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.36723.
Most observational studies examining the association between hearing loss (HL) and cognitive impairment used subjective measures of hearing and addressed only one dimension of cognition, and very few investigated the potential benefit of hearing aids (HAs).
To evaluate objectively measured HL and several dimensions of cognition and estimate the association with HA use.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional analysis of the CONSTANCES cohort study, which recruited participants from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020, was conducted. Participants were a representative sample of adults (age, 45-69 years) with audiometric data and cognitive evaluation from 21 preventive health centers in France. Data analysis was conducted from April 1 to September 15, 2023.
The main exposure was HL, which was defined by a pure-tone average in the best ear higher than 20 dB hearing level for mild loss and 35 dB hearing level for disabling loss. Secondary exposure was self-reported HA use.
Cognition was evaluated at study inclusion by a standardized battery of 5 cognitive tests conducted by trained neuropsychologists. A global cognitive score was computed from principal component analysis and global cognitive impairment was defined as having a score less than or equal to the 25th percentile of the distribution.
The study population included 62 072 participants with audiometric data (mean [SD] age, 57.4 [7] years; 52% women). Overall, 38% (n = 23 768) had mild HL, 10% (n = 6012) had disabling HL, and 3% (n = 1668) were HA users. In multivariable analyses, mild HL (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15) and disabling HL (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.33) were associated with greater global cognitive impairment. The odds of cognitive impairment did not differ significantly between all participants with HA use and participants with disabling HL without HAs (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83-1.07), except among participants with depression (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88).
In this cohort study, an association between the severity of HL and global cognitive impairment was found. The use of HAs was not associated with significantly lower odds of cognitive impairment. The findings suggest that it may be useful to monitor cognitive function in middle-aged individuals with HL.
大多数研究听力损失(HL)与认知障碍之间关联的观察性研究使用了听力的主观测量方法,仅涉及认知的一个维度,而且很少研究助听器(HA)的潜在益处。
评估客观测量的 HL 和几个认知维度,并估计与 HA 使用的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:对 CONSTANCES 队列研究进行了一项横断面分析,该研究于 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日招募参与者,参与者是来自法国 21 个预防保健中心的年龄在 45-69 岁之间具有听力数据和认知评估的成年人的代表性样本。数据分析于 2023 年 4 月 1 日至 9 月 15 日进行。
主要暴露因素是 HL,其定义为在最佳耳朵中纯音平均听力水平高于 20 分贝听力级别的轻度损失和 35 分贝听力级别的失能性损失。次要暴露是自我报告的 HA 使用。
在研究纳入时,通过经过培训的神经心理学家进行的标准化 5 项认知测试评估认知。从主成分分析中计算出总体认知评分,并将总体认知障碍定义为评分低于或等于分布第 25 百分位数。
研究人群包括 62072 名具有听力数据的参与者(平均[SD]年龄为 57.4[7]岁;52%为女性)。总体而言,38%(n=23768)有轻度 HL,10%(n=6012)有失能性 HL,3%(n=1668)是 HA 用户。在多变量分析中,轻度 HL(比值比[OR],1.10;95%置信区间[CI],1.05-1.15)和失能性 HL(OR,1.24;95%CI,1.16-1.33)与更大的总体认知障碍相关。在所有使用 HA 的参与者和没有 HA 的失能性 HL 参与者之间,认知障碍的可能性没有显着差异(OR,0.94;95%CI,0.83-1.07),除了患有抑郁症的参与者(OR,0.62;95%CI,0.44-0.88)。
在这项队列研究中,发现 HL 严重程度与总体认知障碍之间存在关联。HA 的使用与认知障碍的可能性显著降低无关。研究结果表明,在中年 HL 患者中监测认知功能可能是有用的。