School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2436715. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.36715.
Structured education and exercise therapy programs have been proposed to reduce reliance on total knee replacement (TKR) surgery and improve health care sustainability. The long-term cost-effectiveness of these programs is unclear.
To estimate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of implementing a national structured education and exercise therapy program for individuals with knee osteoarthritis with the option for future TKR compared with usual care (TKR for all).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This economic evaluation used a life table model in combination with a Markov model to compare costs and health outcomes of a national education and exercise therapy program vs usual care in the Australian health care system. Subgroup, deterministic, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were completed. A hypothetical cohort of adults aged 45 to 84 years who would undergo TKR was created.
Structured education and exercise therapy intervention provided by physiotherapists. The comparator was usual care where all people undergo TKR without accessing the program in the first year.
Incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold of 28 033 Australian dollars (A$) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, was calculated from a health care perspective. Transition probabilities, costs, and utilities were estimated from national registries and a randomized clinical trial.
The hypothetical cohort included 61 394 individuals (53.9% female; 93.6% aged ≥55 years). Implementation of an education and exercise therapy program resulted in a lifetime cost savings of A$498 307 942 (US $339 922 227), or A$7970 (US $5537) per individual, and resulted in fewer QALYs (0.43 per individual) compared with usual care. At a population level, education and exercise therapy was not cost-effective at the lifetime horizon (INMB, -A$4090 [-US $2841]). Subgroup analysis revealed that the intervention was cost-effective only for the first 9 years and over a lifetime only in individuals with no or mild pain at baseline (INMB, A$11 [US $8]). Results were robust to uncertainty around model inputs.
In this economic evaluation of structured education and exercise therapy compared with usual care, the intervention was not cost-effective over the lifetime for all patients but was for the first 9 years and for those with minimal pain. These findings point to opportunities to invest early cost savings in additional care or prevention, including targeted implementation to specific subgroups.
结构化教育和运动疗法方案已被提出,以减少对全膝关节置换(TKR)手术的依赖,并提高医疗保健的可持续性。这些方案的长期成本效益尚不清楚。
估计在澳大利亚医疗保健系统中,为膝关节骨关节炎患者实施全国性结构化教育和运动疗法方案(可选择进行 TKR)与常规护理(所有患者均接受 TKR)相比,其终生的成本效益。
设计、设置和参与者:本经济评估使用生命表模型结合马尔可夫模型,比较全国性教育和运动疗法方案与常规护理在成本和健康结果方面的差异,常规护理组中所有患者在第一年不接受该方案而直接进行 TKR。进行了亚组、确定性和概率敏感性分析。创建了一个由 45 至 84 岁的成年人组成的假设队列,他们将接受 TKR。
由物理治疗师提供结构化教育和运动疗法干预。对照组为常规护理组,所有患者在第一年不接受该方案而直接进行 TKR。
从医疗保健角度计算了增量净货币效益(INMB),增量成本效益比阈值为每获得 1 个质量调整生命年(QALY)增加 28033 澳元(A$)。转移概率、成本和效用值是从国家登记处和一项随机临床试验中估算得出的。
假设队列包括 61394 名个体(53.9%为女性;93.6%年龄≥55 岁)。实施教育和运动疗法方案可在一生中节省 498307942 澳元(339922227 美元)的成本,或每人节省 7970 澳元(5537 美元),同时减少 0.43 个 QALY(每人)。从人群水平来看,在整个生命周期内,该干预措施并不具有成本效益(INMB,-4090 澳元[-2841 美元])。亚组分析显示,该干预措施仅在前 9 年和在基线时疼痛程度较轻或无疼痛的个体中具有成本效益(INMB,11 澳元[8 美元])。结果对模型输入的不确定性具有稳健性。
在这项与常规护理相比的结构化教育和运动疗法的经济评估中,该干预措施在整个生命周期内对所有患者均不具有成本效益,但在前 9 年和疼痛程度最低的患者中具有成本效益。这些发现表明有机会在额外的护理或预防方面投资早期节省的成本,包括针对特定亚组的有针对性的实施。