Virdun Claudia, Luckett Tim, Lorenz Karl, Davidson Patricia M, Phillips Jane
Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.
VA Palo Alto-Stanford Palliative Care Program and Professor of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Palliat Med. 2020 Dec;34(10):1402-1415. doi: 10.1177/0269216320947570. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
The majority of expected deaths in high income countries occur in hospital where optimal palliative care cannot be assured. In addition, a large number of patients with palliative care needs receive inpatient care in their last year of life. International research has identified domains of inpatient care that patients and carers perceive to be important, but concrete examples of how these might be operationalised are scarce, and few studies conducted in the southern hemisphere.
To seek the perspectives of Australian patients living with palliative care needs about their recent hospitalisation experiences to determine the relevance of domains noted internationally to be important for optimal inpatient palliative care and how these can be operationalised.
An exploratory qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Participants were recruited through five hospitals in New South Wales, Australia.
Twenty-one participants took part. Results confirmed and added depth of understanding to domains previously identified as important for optimal hospital palliative care, including: Effective communication and shared decision making; Expert care; Adequate environment for care; Family involvement in care provision; Financial affairs; Maintenance of sense of self/identity; Minimising burden; Respectful and compassionate care; Trust and confidence in clinicians and Maintenance of patient safety. Two additional domains were noted to be important: Nutritional needs; and Access to medical and nursing specialists.
Taking a person-centred focus has provided a deeper understanding of how to strengthen inpatient palliative care practices. Future work is needed to translate the body of evidence on patient priorities into policy reforms and practice points.
高收入国家中,大多数预期死亡发生在医院,而在这些医院无法确保提供最佳的姑息治疗。此外,大量有姑息治疗需求的患者在其生命的最后一年接受住院治疗。国际研究已确定了患者和护理人员认为重要的住院护理领域,但关于如何将这些领域付诸实践的具体例子却很少,并且在南半球进行的研究也很少。
了解有姑息治疗需求的澳大利亚患者对其近期住院经历的看法,以确定国际上指出的对最佳住院姑息治疗重要的领域的相关性,以及如何将这些领域付诸实践。
一项采用半结构化访谈的探索性定性研究。
地点/参与者:通过澳大利亚新南威尔士州的五家医院招募参与者。
21名参与者参与了研究。结果证实了先前确定的对最佳医院姑息治疗重要的领域,并加深了对这些领域的理解,这些领域包括:有效的沟通和共同决策;专业护理;充足的护理环境;家庭参与护理提供;财务事务;保持自我意识/身份认同;减轻负担;尊重和富有同情心的护理;对临床医生的信任;以及维护患者安全。另外两个领域也被认为很重要:营养需求;以及获得医疗和护理专家的帮助。
以患者为中心的关注提供了对如何加强住院姑息治疗实践的更深入理解。未来需要开展工作,将关于患者优先事项的证据转化为政策改革和实践要点。