• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性研究人工智能在肾移植后护理中的共享决策中的影响(PRIMA-AI):在一家三级护理中心对患者、其支持人员和治疗医生进行的纵向定性研究方案。

Prospectively investigating the impact of AI onshared decision-making in post kidney transplant care (PRIMA-AI): protocol for a longitudinal qualitative study among patients, their support persons and treating physicians at a tertiary care centre.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sociology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Free University of Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):e081318. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081318.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081318
PMID:39353696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11448240/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

As healthcare is shifting from a paternalistic to a patient-centred approach, medical decision making becomes more collaborative involving patients, their support persons (SPs) and physicians. Implementing shared decision-making (SDM) into clinical practice can be challenging and becomes even more complex with the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) as a potential actant in the communicative network. Although there is more empirical research on patients' and physicians' perceptions of AI, little is known about the impact of AI on SDM. This study will help to fill this gap. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic empirical investigation to prospectively assess the views of patients, their SPs and physicians on how AI affects SDM in physician-patient communication after kidney transplantation. Using a transdisciplinary approach, this study will explore the role and impact of an AI-decision support system (DSS) designed to assist with medical decision making in the clinical encounter.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a plan to roll out a 2 year, longitudinal qualitative interview study in a German kidney transplant centre. Semi-structured interviews with patients, SPs and physicians will be conducted at baseline and in 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-up. A total of 50 patient-SP dyads and their treating physicians will be recruited at baseline. Assuming a dropout rate of 20% per year, it is anticipated that 30 patient-SP dyads will be included in the last follow-up with the aim of achieving data saturation. Interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts will be analysed using framework analysis. Participants will be asked to report on their (a) communication experiences and preferences, (b) views on the influence of the AI-based DSS on the normative foundations of the use of AI in medical decision-making, focusing on agency along with trustworthiness, transparency and responsibility and (c) perceptions of the use of the AI-based DSS, as well as barriers and facilitators to its implementation into routine care.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval has been granted by the local ethics committee of Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (EA1/177/23 on 08 August 2023). This research will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (1996). The study findings will be used to develop communication guidance for physicians on how to introduce and sustainably implement AI-assisted SDM. The study results will also be used to develop lay language patient information on AI-assisted SDM. A broad dissemination strategy will help communicate the results of this research to a variety of target groups, including scientific and non-scientific audiences, to allow for a more informed discourse among different actors from policy, science and society on the role and impact of AI in physician-patient communication.

摘要

简介

随着医疗保健从家长式作风向以患者为中心的方法转变,医学决策变得更加协作,涉及患者、他们的支持人员 (SPs) 和医生。将共同决策 (SDM) 实施到临床实践中可能具有挑战性,并且随着人工智能 (AI) 作为沟通网络中的潜在行动者的引入,情况变得更加复杂。尽管已经有更多关于患者和医生对人工智能感知的实证研究,但对于人工智能对 SDM 的影响知之甚少。这项研究将有助于填补这一空白。据我们所知,这是第一项系统的实证研究,旨在前瞻性评估患者、他们的 SPs 和医生对 AI 在肾移植后医患沟通中如何影响 SDM 的看法。本研究将采用跨学科方法,探索旨在协助临床就诊中医疗决策的人工智能决策支持系统 (DSS) 的作用和影响。

方法和分析

这是一项在德国肾移植中心开展为期 2 年的纵向定性访谈研究的计划。将在基线以及 3、6、12 和 24 个月的随访时对患者、SP 和医生进行半结构化访谈。基线时将招募 50 对患者-SP 二人组及其治疗医生。假设每年 20%的流失率,预计最后一次随访将有 30 对患者-SP 二人组参与,目的是实现数据饱和。访谈将进行录音并逐字记录。将使用框架分析对记录进行分析。参与者将被要求报告他们的 (a) 沟通体验和偏好,(b) 对基于人工智能的 DSS 对医疗决策中使用人工智能的规范性基础的影响的看法,重点关注代理机构以及可信度、透明度和责任,以及 (c) 对基于人工智能的 DSS 的看法,以及将其实施到常规护理中的障碍和促进因素。

伦理和传播

当地伦理委员会 Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin(2023 年 8 月 8 日的 EA1/177/23)已批准该研究。本研究将遵循《赫尔辛基宣言》(1996 年)的原则进行。研究结果将用于为医生制定关于如何引入和可持续实施 AI 辅助 SDM 的沟通指南。研究结果还将用于制定关于 AI 辅助 SDM 的通俗易懂的患者信息。广泛的传播策略将有助于向各种目标群体传达这项研究的结果,包括科学和非科学受众,以便在政策、科学和社会的不同行为者之间就 AI 在医患沟通中的作用和影响进行更具信息性的讨论。

相似文献

1
Prospectively investigating the impact of AI onshared decision-making in post kidney transplant care (PRIMA-AI): protocol for a longitudinal qualitative study among patients, their support persons and treating physicians at a tertiary care centre.前瞻性研究人工智能在肾移植后护理中的共享决策中的影响(PRIMA-AI):在一家三级护理中心对患者、其支持人员和治疗医生进行的纵向定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):e081318. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081318.
2
Investigating the Impact of AI on Shared Decision-Making in Post-Kidney Transplant Care (PRIMA-AI): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.探究人工智能对肾移植后护理中共同决策的影响(PRIMA-AI):一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 1;13:e54857. doi: 10.2196/54857.
3
"I need to know what makes somebody tick …": Challenges and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Individualized Oncology.“我需要知道是什么在驱动着……”:个体化肿瘤学中实施共享决策的挑战与策略。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):555-562. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0615. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
4
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
5
Evaluating shared decision making for dialysis initiation: A qualitative study on patient refusal of long-term dialysis in Taiwan.评估透析起始的共同决策:台湾拒绝长期透析的患者的定性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Mar;30(2):174-183. doi: 10.1111/jep.13922. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
6
Shared decision-making in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of patients' preferences and healthcare providers' perspectives.2型糖尿病中的共同决策:对患者偏好和医疗服务提供者观点的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12160-z.
7
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Mixed Comparative Evaluation of a Training Program Dedicated to Cystic Fibrosis Reference Centers: Protocol for the Pilot Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in the Treatment of Diabetes in Adult Patients With Cystic Fibrosis.囊性纤维化参考中心专项培训计划的混合比较评估:成年囊性纤维化患者糖尿病治疗中共同决策试点实施方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 28;14:e62931. doi: 10.2196/62931.
9
Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making behaviours: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice.医生对共同决策行为的认知:一项定性研究揭示了期望与临床实践之间持续存在的差距。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2465-76. doi: 10.1111/hex.12216. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
10
Race and shared decision-making: perspectives of African-Americans with diabetes.种族与共同决策:糖尿病的非裔美国人的观点。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jul;71(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating the Impact of AI on Shared Decision-Making in Post-Kidney Transplant Care (PRIMA-AI): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.探究人工智能对肾移植后护理中共同决策的影响(PRIMA-AI):一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 1;13:e54857. doi: 10.2196/54857.
2
A blended learning for general practitioners and nurses on skills to support shared decision-making with patients about palliative cancer treatment: A one-group pre-posttest study.一项针对全科医生和护士的混合学习,旨在提高与癌症姑息治疗患者共同决策的技能:一项单组前后测试研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Jul;112:107712. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107712. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
3
Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.
将患者价值观和偏好纳入医疗保健中:定性证据的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 18;12(11):e067268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067268.
4
Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation.评估临床决策支持系统以检测肾移植后处于危险中的患者。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 25;10:979448. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.979448. eCollection 2022.
5
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Shared Decision Making: Scoping Review.人工智能在共同决策中的应用:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Aug 9;10(8):e36199. doi: 10.2196/36199.
6
A Call for an Ethics and Governance Action Plan to Harness the Power of Artificial Intelligence and Digitalization in Nephrology.呼吁制定伦理和治理行动计划,以利用肾脏病学中的人工智能和数字化的力量。
Semin Nephrol. 2021 May;41(3):282-293. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2021.05.009.
7
Shared decision making: What is the work?共同决策:何为其工作?
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1591-1595. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.032. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
8
Use of the supportive care framework to explore haematological cancer survivors' unmet needs: a qualitative study.运用支持性照护框架探索血液系统癌症幸存者未满足的需求:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):1062. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05927-7.
9
Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology: Core Concepts, Clinical Applications, and Perspectives.人工智能在肾脏病学中的应用:核心概念、临床应用及展望。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Dec;74(6):803-810. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.05.020. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
10
A Qualitative Study to Understand Patient Perspective on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology.一项旨在了解患者对放射学中人工智能应用看法的定性研究。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Oct;16(10):1416-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.043. Epub 2019 Mar 14.