• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚和新西兰严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征的管理(SAGE-ANZ):一项观察性研究。

Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in Australia and New Zealand (SAGE-ANZ): An observational study.

作者信息

Parke Rachael L, McGuinness Shay P, Cavadino Alana, Cowdrey Keri-Anne, Bates Samantha, Bihari Shailesh, Corley Amanda, Gilder Eileen, Hodgson Carol, Litton Edward, McArthur Colin, Nichol Alistair, Parker Jane, Turner Anne, Webb Steve, Van Haren Frank Mp

机构信息

Cardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

School of Nursing, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Crit Care Resusc. 2024 Jun 21;26(3):161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.05.001. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.05.001
PMID:39355498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11440055/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with significant mortality, morbidity, and cost. We aimed to describe characteristics and management of adult patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand with moderate-severe ARDS, to better understand contemporary practice.

DESIGN

Bi-national, prospective, observational, multi-centre study.

SETTING

19 ICUs in Australia and New Zealand.

PARTICIPANTS

Mechanically ventilated patients with moderate-severe ARDS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline demographic characteristics, ventilation characteristics, use of adjunctive support therapy and all-cause mortality to day 28. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

200 participants were enrolled, mean (±SD) age 55.5 (±15.9) years, 40% (n = 80) female. Around half (51.5%) had no baseline comorbidities and 45 (31%) tested positive for COVID-19. On day 1, mean SOFA score was 9 ± 3; median (IQR) PaO/FiO ratio 119 (89, 142), median (IQR) FiO 70% (50%, 99%) and mean (±SD) positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 11 (±3) cmHO. On day one, 10.5% (n = 21) received lung protective ventilation (LPV) (tidal volume ≤6.5 mL/kg predicted body weight and plateau pressure or peak pressure ≤30 cm HO). Adjunctive therapies were received by 86% (n = 172) of patients at some stage from enrolment to day 28. Systemic steroids were most used (n = 127) followed by neuromuscular blockers (n = 122) and prone positioning (n = 27). Median ventilator-free days (IQR) to day 28 was 5 (0, 20). In-hospital mortality, censored at day 28, was 30.5% (n = 61).

CONCLUSIONS

In Australia and New Zealand, compliance with evidence-based practices including LPV and prone positioning was low in this cohort. Therapies with proven benefit in the treatment of patients with moderate-severe ARDS, such as lung protective ventilation and prone positioning, were not routinely employed.

摘要

目的

急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)与显著的死亡率、发病率和成本相关。我们旨在描述澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房(ICU)收治的中重度ARDS成年患者的特征和管理情况,以更好地了解当代的治疗实践。

设计

双国家、前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究。

设置

澳大利亚和新西兰的19个ICU。

参与者

接受机械通气的中重度ARDS患者。

主要观察指标

基线人口统计学特征、通气特征、辅助支持治疗的使用情况以及至第28天的全因死亡率。数据采用描述性统计进行汇总。

结果

共纳入200名参与者,平均(±标准差)年龄55.5(±15.9)岁,40%(n = 80)为女性。约一半(51.5%)患者无基线合并症,45名(31%)患者新冠病毒检测呈阳性。第1天,平均序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分为9±3;动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数(PaO/FiO)比值中位数(四分位间距)为119(89,142),吸入氧分数(FiO)中位数(四分位间距)为70%(50%,99%),平均(±标准差)呼气末正压(PEEP)为11(±3)cmH₂O。第1天,10.5%(n = 21)的患者接受了肺保护性通气(LPV)(潮气量≤6.5 mL/kg预计体重,平台压或峰压≤30 cmH₂O)。从入组到第28天的某个阶段,86%(n = 17₂)的患者接受了辅助治疗。使用最多的辅助治疗是全身用类固醇(n = 127),其次是神经肌肉阻滞剂(n = 122)和俯卧位通气(n = 27)。至第28天无呼吸机天数中位数(四分位间距)为5(0,20)。以第28天为截尾时间,住院死亡率为30.5%(n = 61)。

结论

在澳大利亚和新西兰,该队列中对包括LPV和俯卧位通气在内的循证实践的依从性较低。在治疗中重度ARDS患者时已证实有获益的治疗方法,如肺保护性通气和俯卧位通气,未被常规采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec5/11440055/c7ef18194bde/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec5/11440055/f679c971a7c5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec5/11440055/c7ef18194bde/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec5/11440055/f679c971a7c5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fec5/11440055/c7ef18194bde/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in Australia and New Zealand (SAGE-ANZ): An observational study.澳大利亚和新西兰严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征的管理(SAGE-ANZ):一项观察性研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2024 Jun 21;26(3):161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.05.001. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Refractory Hypoxemia. A Multicenter Observational Study.急性呼吸窘迫综合征和难治性低氧血症的管理。一项多中心观察性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Dec;14(12):1818-1826. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-1042OC.
3
Variation in Early Management Practices in Moderate-to-Severe ARDS in the United States: The Severe ARDS: Generating Evidence Study.美国中重度 ARDS 早期管理实践的差异:严重 ARDS:产生证据研究。
Chest. 2021 Oct;160(4):1304-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.047. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
4
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 in Argentina (SATICOVID): a prospective, multicentre cohort study.阿根廷 COVID-19 有创通气患者的临床特征和结局(SATICOVID):一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Sep;9(9):989-998. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00229-0. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
5
Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries.全球 50 个国家重症监护病房急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的流行病学、治疗模式和死亡率。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.
6
Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure guided by end-expiratory lung volume in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: study protocol for the multicenter, randomized IPERPEEP trial.早期急性呼吸窘迫综合征中基于呼气末肺容积的个体化呼气末正压通气引导:多中心、随机 IPERPEEP 试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jan 20;23(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05993-0.
7
The PANDORA Study: Prevalence and Outcome of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in the Pre-COVID-19 Era.PANDORA研究:新冠疫情前时代急性低氧性呼吸衰竭的患病率及转归
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Apr 29;4(5):e0684. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000684. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children.急性呼吸窘迫患儿的体位摆放。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD003645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003645.pub4.
9
Clinical features, ventilatory management, and outcome of ARDS caused by COVID-19 are similar to other causes of ARDS.COVID-19 引起的 ARDS 的临床特征、通气管理和预后与其他原因引起的 ARDS 相似。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2200-2211. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06192-2. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
10
Effect of Titrating Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) With an Esophageal Pressure-Guided Strategy vs an Empirical High PEEP-Fio2 Strategy on Death and Days Free From Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经食管压力引导的滴定呼气末正压(PEEP)策略与经验性高 PEEP-FiO2 策略对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡率和机械通气撤机天数的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):846-857. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0555.

本文引用的文献

1
Precision Medicine Using Simultaneous Monitoring and Assessment with Imaging and Biomarkers to Manage Mechanical Ventilation in ARDS.利用影像学和生物标志物同步监测与评估的精准医学管理急性呼吸窘迫综合征的机械通气
Intensive Care Res. 2023;3(3):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s44231-023-00045-4. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
2
A New Global Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的新全球定义。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;209(1):37-47. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202303-0558WS.
3
Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a primer.
严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征的管理:入门指南。
Crit Care. 2023 Jul 18;27(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04572-w.
4
Personalized Respiratory Support in ARDS: A Physiology-to-Bedside Review.急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的个性化呼吸支持:从生理学到床边的综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 21;12(13):4176. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134176.
5
ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies.急性呼吸窘迫综合征 ESICM 指南:定义、表型和呼吸支持策略。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):727-759. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07050-7. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
6
Declining Use of Prone Positioning After High Initial Uptake in COVID-19 Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome.COVID-19 成人呼吸窘迫综合征初始高采用率后俯卧位的使用下降。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Nov 1;51(11):1547-1551. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005969. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
7
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; A Review of Recent Updates and a Glance into the Future.急性呼吸窘迫综合征:近期进展回顾与未来展望
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 24;13(9):1528. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091528.
8
The PROVENT-C19 registry: A study protocol for international multicenter SIAARTI registry on the use of prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 ARDS.PROVENT-C19 登记研究:一项关于 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气患者俯卧位通气的国际多中心 SIAARTI 登记研究方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0276261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276261. eCollection 2022.
9
Efficacy and safety of prone position in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 患者呼吸衰竭时采用俯卧位的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Dec 27;27(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00953-z.
10
Factors Influencing the Implementation of Prone Positioning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.影响 COVID-19 大流行期间俯卧位实施的因素:一项定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Jan;20(1):83-93. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202204-349OC.