• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察在美国一体化医疗服务提供系统中,老年患者使用患者门户和视频访问的情况是否因种族和民族而异:基于电子健康记录和调查的横断面研究。

Examining Whether Patient Portal and Video Visit Use Differs by Race and Ethnicity Among Older Adults in a US Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Cross-Sectional Electronic Health Record and Survey-Based Study.

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, CA, United States.

Department of Adult and Family Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Aging. 2024 Nov 7;7:e63814. doi: 10.2196/63814.

DOI:10.2196/63814
PMID:39509698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11582487/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care systems are increasingly encouraging patients to use patient portals and participate in video visits. However, there is limited information about how portal use differs among older adults.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to understand how patient portal and video visit use differed by age, race, and ethnicity among older adult patients with access to the same digital health resources.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used electronic health record and survey data for adults aged 65 to 85 years who were members of a large Northern California health care delivery system throughout 2019 and 2020. The electronic health record cohort (N=471,152) included 320,686 White, 35,892 Black, 44,922 Latino, 20,786 Chinese, 28,732 Filipino, 8473 South Asian, 6716 Japanese, 2930 Vietnamese, and 2015 Korean adults. Racial and ethnic group and age group (65 to 75 years vs 76 to 85 years) differences in having a patient portal account by December 2020, the performance of 2 portal activities (sending ≥1 message to a clinician in 2019 or 2020 and viewing ≥1 laboratory test result in 2020), and having ≥1 video visit during 2020 were examined. Modified log-Poisson regression was used to examine prevalence ratios for portal and video visit use, comparing racial and ethnic groups to White adults and Asian ethnic groups to Chinese adults after adjusting for sex and age. Data from a 2020 member survey were used to compare internet use factors among 2867 White, 306 Black, 343 Latino, 225 Chinese, and 242 Filipino adults.

RESULTS

Black, Latino, and Filipino adults were less likely to have a patient portal account than White adults, and Filipino adults were less likely to have a patient portal account than Chinese adults. Black, Latino, Filipino, Korean, Vietnamese, and South Asian adults were less likely to have sent messages and viewed test results than White adults, while Chinese and Japanese adults' use of these features was similar to that of White adults. Filipino, Vietnamese, and Korean adults were less likely to have performed the aforementioned activities than Chinese adults. Video visit use was lower among Black and Latino adults and higher among Chinese and South Asian adults compared with White adults (aged 76 to 85 years) and lower among Filipino, Korean, and Vietnamese adults compared to Chinese adults. Survey data suggested that underlying differences in internet use may partially explain the lower use of messaging by Black, Latino, and Filipino adults compared with White and Chinese adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient portal and video visit use differed by race, ethnicity, and age group among older adult patients with access to the same patient portal. Internet use factors may contribute to these differences. Differences in patient portal and video visit use across Asian subgroups underscore the importance of disaggregating use data by Asian ethnicity.

摘要

背景

医疗保健系统越来越鼓励患者使用患者门户并参与视频访问。然而,关于老年人如何使用门户的信息有限。

目的

本研究旨在了解在可获得相同数字健康资源的情况下,老年患者的患者门户和视频访问使用情况在年龄、种族和民族方面有何不同。

方法

这项横断面研究使用了电子健康记录和 2019 年至 2020 年期间参加加利福尼亚州北部大型医疗服务系统的 65 至 85 岁成年人的调查数据。电子健康记录队列(N=471152)包括 320686 名白人、35892 名黑人、44922 名拉丁裔、20786 名中国人、28732 名菲律宾人、8473 名南亚人、6716 名日本人、2930 名越南人和 2015 名韩国人。研究了到 2020 年 12 月拥有患者门户账户、在 2019 年或 2020 年向临床医生发送≥1 条消息以及在 2020 年查看≥1 项实验室检测结果等 2 项门户活动的表现,以及在 2020 年进行≥1 次视频访问方面的种族和民族差异(65 至 75 岁组与 76 至 85 岁组)。使用修正后的对数泊松回归,在调整性别和年龄后,将每个种族和民族组与白人成年人以及亚裔群体与中国成年人进行比较,以检查门户和视频访问使用的患病率比。使用 2020 年成员调查的数据,比较了 2867 名白人、306 名黑人、343 名拉丁裔、225 名中国人和 242 名菲律宾成年人的互联网使用因素。

结果

黑人、拉丁裔和菲律宾成年人拥有患者门户账户的可能性低于白人成年人,而菲律宾成年人拥有患者门户账户的可能性低于中国人成年人。黑人、拉丁裔、菲律宾、韩国、越南和南亚成年人发送消息和查看检测结果的可能性低于白人成年人,而中国人和日本人成年人使用这些功能的可能性与白人成年人相似。与中国成年人相比,菲律宾人、越南人和韩国成年人更不可能进行上述活动。与白人成年人(76 至 85 岁)相比,黑人、拉丁裔和中国人成年人的视频访问使用率较低,而中国人和南亚成年人的视频访问使用率较高,与中国成年人相比,菲律宾人、韩国人和越南成年人的视频访问使用率较低。调查数据表明,互联网使用方面的潜在差异可能部分解释了与白人成年人和中国成年人相比,黑人、拉丁裔和菲律宾成年人使用消息传递功能的比例较低。

结论

在可获得相同患者门户的情况下,老年患者的患者门户和视频访问使用情况因种族、民族和年龄组而异。互联网使用因素可能是造成这些差异的原因。在亚洲亚组之间的患者门户和视频访问使用差异突出表明,按亚洲族裔细分使用数据的重要性。

相似文献

1
Examining Whether Patient Portal and Video Visit Use Differs by Race and Ethnicity Among Older Adults in a US Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Cross-Sectional Electronic Health Record and Survey-Based Study.考察在美国一体化医疗服务提供系统中,老年患者使用患者门户和视频访问的情况是否因种族和民族而异:基于电子健康记录和调查的横断面研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Nov 7;7:e63814. doi: 10.2196/63814.
2
Differences in Access to and Preferences for Using Patient Portals and Other eHealth Technologies Based on Race, Ethnicity, and Age: A Database and Survey Study of Seniors in a Large Health Plan.基于种族、族裔和年龄的患者门户网站及其他电子健康技术的使用机会和偏好差异:一项针对大型健康计划中老年人的数据库及调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 4;18(3):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5105.
3
Video and phone visit use differed by language preference among U.S. Latino and Chinese adults during the first 9 months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional electronic health record study.在新冠疫情的前9个月,美国拉丁裔和华裔成年人中,视频和电话问诊的使用情况因语言偏好而异:一项横断面电子健康记录研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):900. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11356-7.
4
Racial/ethnic variation in devices used to access patient portals.患者门户访问设备的种族/民族差异。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jan 1;24(1):e1-e8.
5
Prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes vary by ethnicity among U.S. Asian adults at healthy weight, overweight, and obesity ranges: an electronic health record study.在美国处于健康体重、超重和肥胖范围内的亚裔成年人中,糖尿病前期和糖尿病的患病率因种族而异:一项电子健康记录研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 22;22(1):1954. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14362-8.
6
Differences in Care Team Response to Patient Portal Messages by Patient Race and Ethnicity.患者种族和民族差异对患者门户信息的医护团队响应的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242618. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2618.
7
U.S. Filipino Adults Have Elevated Prevalence of Hypertension Across the Adult Lifespan: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Electronic Health Record Study.美国菲律宾裔成年人在整个成年期高血压患病率均较高:一项横断面电子健康记录研究的结果
AJPM Focus. 2024 Feb 23;3(3):100211. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100211. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Racial and Ethnic Digital Divides in Posting COVID-19 Content on Social Media Among US Adults: Secondary Survey Analysis.美国成年人在社交媒体上发布新冠疫情相关内容时的种族和族裔数字鸿沟:二次调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 3;22(7):e20472. doi: 10.2196/20472.
9
The Importance of Visit Notes on Patient Portals for Engaging Less Educated or Nonwhite Patients: Survey Study.患者门户网站上的就诊记录对教育程度较低或非白人患者参与医疗的重要性:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 24;20(5):e191. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9196.
10
Older adults' readiness to engage with eHealth patient education and self-care resources: a cross-sectional survey.老年人参与电子健康患者教育和自我护理资源的意愿:一项横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2986-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual-Level Digital Determinants of Health and Technology Acceptance of Patient Portals: Cross-Sectional Assessment.健康的个体层面数字决定因素与患者门户网站的技术接受度:横断面评估
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 10;8:e56493. doi: 10.2196/56493.
2
The Digital Transition: Are Adults Aged 65 Years or Older Willing to Complete Online Forms and Questionnaires in Patient Portals?数字转型:65 岁及以上的成年人是否愿意在患者门户中填写在线表格和问卷?
Perm J. 2024 Mar 15;28(1):68-75. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.112. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
3
Ensuring Equitable Access to Patient Portals-Closing the "Techquity" Gap.确保患者门户的公平获取——弥合“技术公平”差距。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Nov 3;4(11):e233406. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3406.
4
Progress and Persistent Disparities in Patient Access to Electronic Health Information.患者获取电子健康信息的进展和持续差距。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Nov 3;4(11):e233883. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3883.
5
Cancer Patients' Preferences and Perceptions of Advantages and Disadvantages of Telehealth Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic.癌症患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间对远程医疗访问的优缺点的偏好和看法。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Sep;7:e2300040. doi: 10.1200/CCI.23.00040.
6
Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Use of Electronic Medical Record Messaging Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Quality Improvement Study.种族和民族差异对乳腺癌患者电子病历信息使用的影响:一项质量改进研究。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2023 Oct;23(7):e434-e440. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
7
Comparing Kaiser Permanente Members to the General Population: Implications for Generalizability of Research.比较 Kaiser Permanente 会员与普通人群:对研究可推广性的影响。
Perm J. 2023 Jun 15;27(2):87-98. doi: 10.7812/TPP/22.172. Epub 2023 May 12.
8
Estimated Indirect Cost Savings of Using Telehealth Among Nonelderly Patients With Cancer.估算使用远程医疗为非老年癌症患者节省的间接成本。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250211. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50211.
9
Disparities in patient portal access and the role of providers in encouraging access and use.患者门户访问的差异以及提供者在鼓励访问和使用方面的作用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jan 18;30(2):308-317. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac227.
10
Overestimation of Relative Risk and Prevalence Ratio: Misuse of Logistic Modeling.相对风险和患病率比的高估:逻辑回归模型的误用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 17;12(11):2851. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112851.