Kindi Nafaa Ai, Abri Faisal Ai, Yaseen Ahmed, Muzaffar Rahil, Ghaithi Ahmed Ai, Farii Humaid Ai, Mutani Mohammed Ai, Al-Amri Ayman, Baluki Wafa Ai, Maskari Sultan Ai
Department of Orthopedic, Oman Medical Speciality, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Department of Surgery, Orthopedic division, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat. Muscat, Oman.
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2024 May-Aug;19(2):94-98. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1614. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
To evaluate the role of post-debridement cultures in the prevention of future infection following open fractures.
Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Academic and tertiary health care, Muscat, Oman.
A total of 166 patients from a cohort study and 539 patients from the literature review with open fractures. There were 640 cumulative patients fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, data on all open fractures were gathered from the electronic health system of a single institution between 2010 and 2019. PubMed and Embase electronic databases were also searched for relevant articles relating to post-surgical debridement culture and its correlation with future infection.
Assessing the benefit, role of post-debridement cultures in the prevention of future infection following open fractures.
Combining the results of this retrospective cohort study and previously published data, there were 640 Gustilo-Anderson grades II and III open fractures which had post-debridement screening. Eighty-eight patients (13.8%) developed an infection, out of which 16 had positive post- debridement cultures (18.2%). Only four grew similar organisms at screening and infection stages, two of which had different antibiotic resistance patterns at the infection stage. Seventy-two fractures had negative post-debridement screening swabs (81.8%). Of the 59 (9.2%) fractures with positive screening only four (6.8% of the infected fractures) developed later deep infection. All these 59 cases had culture-guided antibiotic treatment, with or without surgical debridement.
Although the bacterial growth of post-debridement cultures is low, post-debridement screening as part of a comprehensive management protocol may have a role in reducing deep infection in open fractures. This is particularly the case in Gustilo and Anderson type 3 open fractures, the risk of infection is high. The poor association between organisms isolated from screening and those from subsequent deep infection may mean that the later infective organisms have been acquired from a secondary colonisation source after the debridement.
III.
Kindi NA, Abri FA, Yaseen A, Do Post-debridement Cultures have a Role in Reduction of Infection in Open Fractures? Report of 166 Cases and Literature Review. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(2):94-98.
评估清创后培养在预防开放性骨折术后感染中的作用。
回顾性队列研究及文献综述。
阿曼马斯喀特苏丹卡布斯大学医院骨科,学术及三级医疗保健机构。
队列研究中的166例患者及文献综述中的539例开放性骨折患者。共有640例累积患者符合纳入及排除标准。
采用预定的纳入及排除标准,收集2010年至2019年期间来自单一机构电子健康系统的所有开放性骨折数据。同时检索PubMed和Embase电子数据库,查找与术后清创培养及其与未来感染相关性的相关文章。
评估清创后培养在预防开放性骨折术后感染中的益处及作用。
结合本回顾性队列研究结果及先前发表的数据,共有640例Gustilo-Anderson II级和III级开放性骨折进行了清创后筛查。88例患者(13.8%)发生感染,其中16例清创后培养结果为阳性(18.2%)。仅4例在筛查及感染阶段培养出相似微生物,其中2例在感染阶段具有不同的抗生素耐药模式。72例骨折清创后筛查拭子结果为阴性(81.8%)。在59例(9.2%)筛查阳性的骨折中,仅4例(占感染骨折的6.8%)随后发生深部感染。所有这59例均接受了培养指导的抗生素治疗,有或无手术清创。
尽管清创后培养的细菌生长率较低,但作为综合管理方案一部分的清创后筛查可能在减少开放性骨折深部感染方面发挥作用。在Gustilo和Anderson 3型开放性骨折中尤其如此,其感染风险较高。筛查分离出的微生物与随后深部感染的微生物之间关联不佳,这可能意味着后期感染性微生物是在清创后从二次定植源获得的。
III级。
Kindi NA, Abri FA, Yaseen A, 清创后培养对减少开放性骨折感染有作用吗?166例病例报告及文献综述。《创伤肢体重建策略》2024;19(2):94 - 98。