Dujari Shefali, Scott Brian J, Gold Carl A, Weng Yingjie, Kvam Kathryn A
From the Department of Neurology & Neurological Sciences (S.D., B.J.S., C.A.G., K.A.K.), and Quantitative Sciences Unit (Y.W.), Stanford University, CA.
Neurol Educ. 2024 May 9;3(2):e200131. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200131. eCollection 2024 Jun.
As the prevalence of the neurohospitalist (NH) practice model grows, understanding its effect on trainee education is imperative. We sought to determine the impact of an academic NH program on neurology resident evaluations of faculty teaching.
We performed a retrospective study of faculty teaching evaluations before and after the implementation of a full-time NH service. Primary outcomes were neurology resident evaluations of faculty teaching, which were compared in the pre-NH period (August 2010-July 2014) vs the post-NH period (August 2016-July 2018). In a secondary analysis, we used the difference-in-difference approach to analyze the effect of introducing the NH service on resident evaluation of faculty teaching compared with stroke and neurocritical care faculty controls. We performed an additional descriptive analysis of medical student evaluation of faculty teaching and described Residency In-service Training Exam scores and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) resident survey data before and after the intervention.
There were 368 resident and 360 medical student evaluations of faculty teaching during the study period. Compared to the pre-NH period, the post-NH period had significantly higher resident evaluations of faculty teaching in 19 of 27 questions of faculty teaching, across 5 of the 6 ACGME core competencies. Within the competencies of patient care, practice-based learning and improvement, and systems-based practice, the NH teaching faculty were rated significantly higher across all questions. In the difference-in-difference model, resident evaluations of faculty teaching following the implementation of the NH service remained significantly improved compared with controls in teaching evidence-based medicine, teaching diagnostic algorithms, and explaining rationale for clinical decisions. Medical student ratings of faculty teaching were unchanged in the pre-NH and the post-NH period.
Neurology residents may benefit from the clinical expertise of NHs and their ability to teach evidence-based practice and role model systems-based practice. Given the central role NHs may play in trainee education, additional focus on both the local and national levels should be dedicated to further developing the teaching skills of NHs.
随着神经科住院医师(NH)执业模式的普及,了解其对实习生教育的影响势在必行。我们试图确定一个学术性NH项目对神经科住院医师对教员教学评价的影响。
我们对全职NH服务实施前后的教员教学评价进行了回顾性研究。主要结果是神经科住院医师对教员教学的评价,在NH实施前时期(2010年8月至2014年7月)与NH实施后时期(2016年8月至2018年7月)进行比较。在二次分析中,我们采用差异-in-差异方法分析引入NH服务对住院医师对教员教学评价的影响,并与中风和神经重症监护教员对照组进行比较。我们对医学生对教员教学的评价进行了额外的描述性分析,并描述了干预前后的住院医师在职培训考试成绩和毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)住院医师调查数据。
在研究期间,有368名住院医师和360名医学生对教员教学进行了评价。与NH实施前时期相比,在ACGME的6项核心能力中的5项中,NH实施后时期在27项教员教学问题中的19项上,住院医师对教员教学的评价显著更高。在患者护理、基于实践的学习与改进以及基于系统的实践能力方面,NH教学教员在所有问题上的评分都显著更高。在差异-in-差异模型中,与对照组相比,NH服务实施后住院医师对教员教学的评价在循证医学教学、诊断算法教学以及解释临床决策依据方面仍有显著改善。医学生对教员教学的评分在NH实施前和实施后时期没有变化。
神经科住院医师可能受益于NH的临床专业知识及其传授循证实践和树立基于系统的实践榜样的能力。鉴于NH在实习生教育中可能发挥的核心作用,地方和国家层面应进一步关注NH教学技能的发展。