• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

需要一个更客观、包容和公平的胃肠病学奖学金选拔流程。

Need for a More Objective, Inclusive, and Equitable Selection Process for Gastroenterology Fellowships.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Bayonne Medical Center, 29 East 29the Street, Bayonne, NJ, 07002, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Nov;69(11):4017-4024. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08592-6. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08592-6
PMID:39361197
Abstract

Diseases related to the digestive system account for a significant proportion of the diseases burden in the United States and result in 36.8 million ambulatory visits, 3.8 million hospital admissions, and 22.2 million gastrointestinal endoscopies. To meet the challenge that this quantum of gastroenterological disorders poses, we are obligated to select and train competent gastroenterologists. Admission into a Gastroenterology (GI) fellowship program is highly selective. In 2023, only 62.7% of candidates who applied were successful in matching into a fellowship program, making it even more competitive than a cardiology fellowship (match rate of 68.4%). Therefore, it is imperative that we ensure that the selection process is fair and transparent. Additionally, we need to be socially more responsible by emphasizing diversity and inclusivity to produce gastroenterologists who reflect the changing society we live in. An analysis of current practices indicates that the process of selection is not standardized and is more subjective than objective. This review is an attempt to identify deficiencies that can be rectified by the introduction of a standardized system that includes structured interviews, Standard Letters of Recommendation (SLOR), and objective scoring protocols-all of which would make the process of selection more equitable, diverse, and inclusive. Newer methods like Casper exam, Psychometric testing, and Preference Signaling can also be explored to this end.

摘要

消化系统相关疾病在美国疾病负担中占很大比例,导致 3680 万次门诊就诊、380 万次住院治疗和 2220 万次胃肠内窥镜检查。为了应对这一大笔胃肠道疾病带来的挑战,我们有义务选拔和培养有能力的胃肠病学家。进入胃肠病学(GI)研究员计划的选拔是高度选择性的。2023 年,只有 62.7%的申请候选人成功匹配到研究员计划,这使得它比心脏病学研究员计划(匹配率为 68.4%)更具竞争力。因此,我们必须确保选拔过程公平透明。此外,我们需要通过强调多样性和包容性来承担更多的社会责任,培养出反映我们所生活的不断变化的社会的胃肠病学家。对当前实践的分析表明,选拔过程没有标准化,主观性大于客观性。本综述试图确定可以通过引入标准化系统来纠正的缺陷,该系统包括结构化面试、标准推荐信 (SLOR) 和客观评分协议——所有这些都将使选拔过程更加公平、多样化和包容。为此,还可以探索 Casper 考试、心理测试和偏好信号等新方法。

相似文献

1
Need for a More Objective, Inclusive, and Equitable Selection Process for Gastroenterology Fellowships.需要一个更客观、包容和公平的胃肠病学奖学金选拔流程。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Nov;69(11):4017-4024. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08592-6. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
2
How to Incorporate a Chief Fellow Into a Gastroenterology Fellowship Program.如何将总住院医师纳入胃肠病学住院医师培训项目。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Oct;159(4):1227-1230. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
3
Interview from anywhere: feasibility and utility of web-based videoconference interviews in the gastroenterology fellowship selection process.随时随地进行面试:基于网络的视频会议面试在胃肠病学研究员选拔过程中的可行性和实用性。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb;109(2):155-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.278.
4
Bringing order to the chaos: developing a matching process for minimally invasive and gastrointestinal postgraduate fellowships.为混乱带来秩序:制定微创与胃肠病学研究生奖学金的匹配流程。
Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):431-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000205217.45477.25.
5
Increased average number of medical publications per interviewee from 2009 to 2018: a study of 100 interviewees to an academic gastroenterology fellowship program.接受学术型胃肠病学研究员培训计划的 100 名受访者中,受访者的平均医学出版物数量从 2009 年增加到 2018 年:一项对 100 名受访者的研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Nov 4;19(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1841-2.
6
Virtual Interviews in the Post-COVID-19 Emergency Era: Insights from the Gastroenterology Fellowship Applicants and Programs.后 COVID-19 紧急时期的虚拟面试:来自胃肠病学研究员申请人和项目的见解。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Sep;69(9):3156-3164. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08551-1. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
7
Stricter national standards are required for credentialing of endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography in the United States.美国需要更严格的内镜逆行胰胆管造影认证标准。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 21;25(27):3468-3483. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3468.
8
Landing a GI Fellowship: The Match and the Map.胃肠病学奖学金申请:竞赛与策略。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Mar;63(3):605-609. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4826-1. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
9
The gastroenterology fellowship match--the first two years.胃肠病学专科培训项目匹配——头两年
Gastroenterology. 2008 Aug;135(2):344-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.075. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
10
The advanced endoscopy fellowship match: an update and perspectives.高级内镜 fellowship 匹配:最新情况与观点
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Dec;76(6):1211-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.026. Epub 2012 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Concise Commentary: Twelve Steps on the Path to Improving Training Programs-Recruiting GI Fellows in 2024 and Beyond.简明评论:改善培训项目之路的十二个步骤——2024年及以后招募胃肠病学研究员
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Nov;69(11):4025-4026. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08637-w. Epub 2024 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic Skills Training: The Impact of Virtual Exercises on Simulated Colonoscopy.内镜技能培训:虚拟练习对模拟结肠镜检查的影响
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr 4;29(6):374-384. doi: 10.1159/000520237. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Bridging the Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Gap in Gastroenterology.弥合胃肠病学领域的种族、民族和性别差距。
Gastroenterology. 2022 Oct;163(4):800-805. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.037.
3
Impact of blinding interviewers to written applications on ranking of Gynecologic Oncology fellowship applicants from groups underrepresented in medicine.
对书面申请进行面试人员盲法处理对医学领域代表性不足群体的妇科肿瘤学住院医师申请排名的影响
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jan 26;39:100935. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100935. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
An Overview of the GI Fellowship Interview: Part I-Tips for the Interviewee.胃肠病学专科培训面试概述:第一部分——给面试者的建议。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 May;67(5):1707-1711. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07408-9. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
5
Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 2021.美国胃肠道、肝脏和胰腺疾病的负担和成本:2021 年更新。
Gastroenterology. 2022 Feb;162(2):621-644. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.017. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
6
The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience.耳鼻喉科住院医师培训偏好信号体验。
Acad Med. 2022 May 1;97(5):664-668. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004441. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
7
Reimagining Residency Selection: Part 3-A Practical Guide to Ranking Applicants in the Post-COVID-19 Era.重新构想住院医师选拔:第3部分——新冠疫情后时代对申请人进行排名的实用指南
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Dec;12(6):666-670. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-01087.1. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
8
Characteristics of internal medicine residents who successfully match into cardiology fellowships.成功匹配心内科住院医师培训的内科住院医师的特征。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jul 28;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02154-w.
9
Program Directors' Perspectives of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Fellowship Application.项目主任对胃肠病学和肝病学 fellowship 申请的看法
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Sep;65(9):2735-2736. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06378-0. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
10
A transparent and defensible process for applicant selection within a Canadian emergency medicine residency program.加拿大急诊医学住院医师项目申请人选拔的透明且合理的流程。
CJEM. 2020 Mar;22(2):215-223. doi: 10.1017/cem.2019.460.