Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0311272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311272. eCollection 2024.
Perceived injustice is a relatively novel psychosocial construct starting to get some attention among researchers studying health and mental health outcomes. In the context of the widespread perception of being a victim of injustice in Bangladesh, a gap in instruments measuring perceived injustice was evident. The novelty of the construct and lack of similar instruments necessitated the development of a new Perceived Injustice Scale for Bangla speaking population.
A three-stage approach was used to develop the instrument. A thorough review of literature coupled with interviews with the general population as well as professionals contributed to the conceptualization of the construct. A rigorous process of expert evaluation and item analysis resulted in the identification of the most suitable items.
The scale demonstrated a single-factor structure with adequate evidence of its reliability and validity. Reliability of the scale was assessed using internal consistency method (Cronbach alpha = .931; p< .01) and test-retest method (r = .837; p< .01). While validity was assessed using criterion-related validity (correlation with the Steel Injustice Inventory at r = .428; p< .01) and construct validity (correlation with the Perceived Stress Scale at r = .332; p< .01; and with the WHO Wellbeing Index at r = -.361; p< .01).
The strong evidence of reliability and validity suggests the suitability of the scale for measuring perceived injustice in Bangladesh. Researchers and clinicians can use this 10-item scale with confidence in assessing perceived injustice among the general population.
感知不公正是一个相对新颖的社会心理建构,开始受到研究健康和心理健康结果的研究人员的关注。在孟加拉国普遍存在被视为不公受害者的观念背景下,衡量感知不公的工具存在明显差距。由于该构念具有新颖性且缺乏类似的工具,因此有必要为讲孟加拉语的人群开发一种新的感知不公量表。
采用三阶段方法开发该工具。对文献进行全面审查,结合对普通人群和专业人士的访谈,有助于构念的概念化。通过专家评估和项目分析的严格过程,确定了最合适的项目。
该量表表现出单因素结构,具有足够的可靠性和有效性证据。使用内部一致性方法(克朗巴赫 α =.931;p<.01)和测试-重测方法(r =.837;p<.01)评估量表的可靠性。而使用效标关联效度(与 Steel 不公量表的相关性为 r =.428;p<.01)和结构效度(与感知压力量表的相关性为 r =.332;p<.01;与 WHO 幸福感量表的相关性为 r = -.361;p<.01)评估有效性。
可靠性和有效性的有力证据表明,该量表适合衡量孟加拉国的感知不公。研究人员和临床医生可以使用这个 10 项量表,自信地评估普通人群中的感知不公。