Heilijgers Floor, Gloviczki Peter, O'Sullivan Gerry, Chavent Bertrand, Avgerinos Efthymios D, Harth Karem, Black Stephen A, Erben Young M, Rotmans Joris I, Richards Toby, Chaer Rabih A, Villalba Laurencia, Jayaraj Arjun, Malgor Rafael D, Tripathi Ramesh K, Dua Anahita, Murphy Erin, Rinckenbach Simon, Vedantham Suresh, Hamming Jaap F, van der Vorst Joost R
Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 Jan;13(1):101970. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101970. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
Nutcracker syndrome (NCS) describes the symptomatic compression of the left renal vein between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery. Whereas asymptomatic compression is a common radiological finding, patients with NCS can report a range of symptoms. There are no specific diagnostic criteria and interventions include a range of open surgical and endovascular procedures. Therefore, we wished to develop an international consensus document covering aspects of diagnosis, management, and follow-up for patients with NCS.
A three-stage modified Delphi consensus was performed. A steering committee developed 37 statements covering 3 categories for patients with NCS: diagnosis, management, and follow-up. These statements were reported individually by 20 international experts in the management of venous disease, using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined if ≥70% of respondents rated the statement between 1 and 2 (agreement) and between 4 and 5 (disagreement). Those statements without consensus were recirculated in a second round of voting. A third round of the questionnaire was performed with 14 additional statements to clarify diagnostic values of NCS.
Responses were returned by 20 of 20 experts (100%) in round one and 17 of 20 (85%) in round two. Initial consensus was reached in 24 of 37 statements (65%) spread over all categories. Round two achieved a further consensus on 5 out of 10 statements (50%). No categories reported consensus on all statements. In round two consensus was reached in the category of follow-up (4/5 statements [80%]). The final round reached consensus on 5 out of 14 statements (36%). Experts agreed that imaging is obligated to confirm NCS. Experts did not agree on specific diagnostic cut-off values. There was a consensus that the first choice of operative treatment is left renal vein transposition and that the risk of stent migration outweighs the advantages of a percutaneous procedure.
Consensus was achieved on most statements concerning the assessment and management of NCS. This Delphi consensus identified those areas in which further research is needed, such as antiplatelet therapy, endovascular treatment, and renal autotransplantation. A rare disease registry to improve data and reports of patient outcomes is warranted.
胡桃夹综合征(NCS)是指左肾静脉在腹主动脉和肠系膜上动脉之间受到压迫并产生症状。虽然无症状性压迫是一种常见的影像学表现,但NCS患者可能会出现一系列症状。目前尚无具体的诊断标准,治疗方法包括一系列开放手术和血管内介入手术。因此,我们希望制定一份国际共识文件,涵盖NCS患者的诊断、治疗和随访等方面。
采用三阶段改良德尔菲共识法。一个指导委员会制定了37条陈述,涵盖NCS患者的3个类别:诊断、治疗和随访。这些陈述由20位国际静脉疾病管理专家分别使用5级李克特量表进行报告。如果≥70%的受访者将陈述评为1至2分(同意)或4至5分(不同意),则达成共识。那些未达成共识的陈述在第二轮投票中重新分发。第三轮问卷增加了14条陈述,以明确NCS的诊断价值。
第一轮20位专家中有20位(100%)回复,第二轮20位中有17位(85%)回复。37条陈述中有24条(65%)在所有类别中初步达成共识。第二轮在10条陈述中有5条(50%)进一步达成共识。没有一个类别所有陈述都达成共识。第二轮在随访类别中达成共识(5条陈述中有4条[80%])。最后一轮在14条陈述中有5条(36%)达成共识。专家们一致认为影像学检查对于确诊NCS是必要的。专家们对于具体的诊断临界值未达成一致。对于手术治疗的首选是左肾静脉转位以及支架移位的风险超过经皮手术的优势这两点达成了共识。
在大多数关于NCS评估和管理的陈述上达成了共识。这份德尔菲共识确定了需要进一步研究的领域,如抗血小板治疗、血管内治疗和肾自体移植。有必要建立一个罕见病登记系统以改善患者数据和结果报告。